DriversRecommendedOutdated drivers can make a good PC feel brokenScan driver issues before chasing fixes manually.Scan NowHalloween DealsAmazon USHalloween week deals: useful picks before month-endAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsPC HealthRecommendedCrashes, freezes, slowdowns? Check your PC nowSpot repairable issues before they interrupt work.Check PC×
Skip to the story
DocumentaryTubeTRUE STORIES, ON SCREEN.
  1. DocumentaryTube
  2. The Screening Room
  3. Blog

Blog

Who Are Glitchtrap and Scraptrap in FNAF: Security Breach?

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.

Scraptrap and Glitchtrap are different forms linked by the rabbit identity associated with William Afton. Scraptrap is the fandom’s name for Afton’s later, badly damaged Spring Bonnie body in Freddy Fazbear’s Pizzeria Simulator. In Five Nights at Freddy’s: Security Breach, “Scraptrap” appears mainly as the name on the Dr. Scraptrap arcade artwork, not as the name of the underground boss.

Glitchtrap is a digital rabbit anomaly first introduced in Five Nights at Freddy’s: Help Wanted. Security Breach carries that threat through Princess Quest, Vanny’s influence and recurring rabbit imagery. The physical rabbit-bodied enemy on the underground ending route is called Burntrap. Later evidence from Ruin makes Burntrap’s exact identity—and the question of whether Glitchtrap is literally Afton’s soul—deliberately unresolved.

Who are Glitchtrap and Scraptrap?

They occupy different places in the series’ timeline and different kinds of bodies. Scraptrap is an older, physical Afton form; Glitchtrap is primarily software or an artificial-digital presence. Burntrap is the name normally used for the physical rabbit enemy seen on one Security Breach route.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Name What it is Where the identity is established Role in Security Breach
Scraptrap William Afton’s heavily damaged Spring Bonnie form Freddy Fazbear’s Pizzeria Simulator; the label is also used by fans Referenced by the Dr. Scraptrap arcade artwork rather than introduced as the main boss
Glitchtrap A rabbit-like digital anomaly associated with scanned legacy data Help Wanted, Tape Girl’s recordings and later arcade imagery Connected to Princess Quest, Vanny and the game’s rabbit symbolism
Burntrap A physical rabbit-bodied antagonist The underground route and ending of Security Breach Confronts Gregory and Freddy beneath the Pizzaplex on that route
The Mimic An entity capable of copying people, voices and behavior Security Breach: Ruin Impersonates Gregory and reframes some apparent Afton behavior as imitation

All four names can appear together in fan explanations because they use the same visual language: a rabbit, Spring Bonnie imagery and the legacy of Afton. That visual continuity does not make the labels interchangeable. The safest approach is to identify the form and the medium first, then discuss possible connections.

Is Scraptrap William Afton?

Yes. Scraptrap is the damaged Spring Bonnie form generally identified with William Afton after the earlier Springtrap incarnation. The character appears in Pizzeria Simulator as a deteriorated, exposed version of the rabbit suit. “Scraptrap” is chiefly a community name used to distinguish this redesign from Springtrap; it is not the name of a separate human villain.

That distinction matters in Security Breach. The game does not introduce a Scraptrap boss who replaces the older character. Instead, players can find the Dr. Scraptrap arcade reference, which acknowledges the name as part of the Pizzaplex’s game and media culture. Treating that artwork as proof that Scraptrap is the underground antagonist collapses two separate references.

Afton’s history explains why the name remains useful. He is the human murderer whose springlock accident leaves him trapped in a Spring Bonnie suit. The resulting suit-bound form is called Springtrap in earlier material and appears in a more ruined design as Scraptrap. Those are physical incarnations in the older storyline, unlike Glitchtrap’s initial presentation as a digital anomaly.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Who is Glitchtrap?

Glitchtrap is the rabbit-shaped digital threat introduced in Help Wanted. Hidden recordings describe legacy circuit-board data being scanned into the Freddy Fazbear Virtual Experience. Tape Girl’s fragmented logs show how the anomalous material is handled and how the threat can be reconstructed inside the project.

The game communicates Glitchtrap through software, virtual spaces and a human-shaped rabbit avatar rather than a conventional corpse in a suit. That presentation is why “digital Afton” is a useful shorthand but not a settled definition. The recordings establish the data transfer and the anomaly’s behavior; they do not provide a single explicit sentence proving that William Afton’s soul was copied intact.

In Security Breach, Glitchtrap is less often encountered as a standalone avatar. The influence appears through Vanny’s role, rabbit symbols and the Princess Quest arcade sequence. Completing the Princess Quest games leads to an ending in which Vanessa is freed from the influence associated with Vanny. The route is an important piece of evidence for Glitchtrap’s presence, but it still does not settle whether the digital entity is Afton, an Afton-derived program or something imitating him.

Is Burntrap the same as Scraptrap?

They are not the same name for the same on-screen form. Scraptrap is the damaged Afton suit from Pizzeria Simulator; Burntrap is the physical rabbit-bodied enemy encountered beneath the Pizzaplex on one Security Breach ending route.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Burntrap’s body and setting invite comparison with Afton’s earlier forms. The route descends into the remains of an old pizzeria, where Gregory and Freddy face a charred rabbit threat. Environmental design, posture and rabbit imagery encourage players to read Burntrap as part of the Afton lineage. Those clues establish an intentional connection in the series’ visual storytelling, but they do not by themselves establish that the exact Scraptrap body has been rebuilt.

The names also serve different purposes. “Scraptrap” is a retrospective fan label for a particular Pizzeria Simulator design, while “Burntrap” identifies the Security Breach encounter. Using the correct name prevents a common timeline error: the underground boss should not automatically be described as Scraptrap simply because both are damaged rabbit figures.

Later material complicates a direct continuation. In Ruin, the Mimic impersonates Gregory and the M.X.E.S. system functions as part of the containment keeping that entity confined. This provides an in-game model for a hostile presence that can reproduce Afton-like behavior or imagery without being Afton’s surviving body. The games leave room for a connection between Burntrap and earlier Afton forms, but they do not issue a definitive identity statement.

Are Glitchtrap and Burntrap the same person?

They can be read as linked manifestations, but the games do not confirm that they are literally one person in two bodies. Glitchtrap is primarily digital; Burntrap is a physical antagonist in a specific ending route. Their shared rabbit design and relationship to Vanny make a connection likely, yet “same person” assumes an answer to the unresolved question of what Glitchtrap actually is.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

There are several defensible readings:

  • Afton-derived continuation: Glitchtrap could be a digital continuation of Afton’s identity, with Burntrap representing a physical body or vessel connected to that program.
  • Mimic interpretation: Glitchtrap-like behavior could be the Mimic copying Afton’s image, language and methods after exposure to legacy material. Burntrap would then be an Afton-coded presentation rather than proof of Afton’s soul.
  • Composite reading: the modern threat could combine scanned legacy data, copied behavior and physical hardware, making a single biological or spiritual identity impossible to assign.

None of these readings has been declared the definitive answer by the games. Help Wanted 2 commentary keeps the choice open while treating the Mimic as the principal antagonist revealed by Ruin. The strongest wording is therefore “Afton-coded,” “Afton-derived” or “connected to the Afton legacy,” unless a sentence is describing an event that is visibly shown on screen.

Is Glitchtrap the Mimic?

The current story supports the Mimic as a major explanation for Glitchtrap-like behavior, but it has not erased every competing interpretation. Ruin gives the clearest direct evidence: the entity calling to Cassie in Gregory’s voice is the Mimic, and the M.X.E.S. system is involved in containing it. The ability to copy a trusted person’s voice and identity is exactly the mechanism needed to explain why an apparent Gregory or Afton presence may be deceptive.

This does not retroactively provide a fully explicit line saying “Glitchtrap was always the Mimic.” Instead, it changes how earlier clues should be weighed. A rabbit avatar, a familiar voice or Afton-like conduct can be an imitation produced by a copying intelligence. The fact that the Mimic can impersonate Gregory makes imitation an in-game capability, not merely a fan theory.

The unresolved part concerns the relationship between copied behavior and the scanned legacy data from Help Wanted. The Mimic may be reproducing Afton’s identity after learning it, may be operating alongside Afton-derived code, or may be part of a broader composite threat. Later official promotion of Secret of the Mimic confirms that Mimic-focused continuity remains central to the series, but it does not supply a final one-sentence answer to Glitchtrap’s ontology.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Which Security Breach ending is canon?

The games strongly favor the Princess Quest outcome as the practical basis for Ruin, but Steel Wool has not issued an explicit declaration naming one ending canon. Security Breach contains several endings. The Burntrap route reaches the underground pizzeria and stages the physical rabbit confrontation; the Princess Quest route completes three arcade games and presents Vanessa as freed from the influence associated with Vanny.

Ruin supplies the main continuity clue. Its comic pages and the altered Princess Quest III cabinet are commonly read as evidence that the Princess Quest resolution is the version that carried forward. That is an evidence-based interpretation rather than a developer statement, so it should be presented as the most supported reading, not as an officially numbered canon ending.

This distinction also explains why Burntrap can remain important without being the endpoint of the current story. A route can reveal imagery, mechanics or information that later chapters reinterpret, even if another ending provides the continuity baseline. The existence of Burntrap in the base game therefore does not require every later event to treat that route as literal history.

How should you read the rabbit imagery in the modern games?

Use the imagery as a connection signal, not as an automatic identity label. The rabbit shape points toward Spring Bonnie, Afton’s history, Vanny’s influence and the possibility of copied behavior. To decide what a scene establishes, separate what is directly shown from what the design suggests.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Directly shown events

  • Help Wanted presents a rabbit-like digital anomaly and recordings about scanned legacy circuit-board data.
  • Security Breach presents Vanny-related influence, Princess Quest and a physical rabbit enemy on the Burntrap route.
  • Ruin shows the Mimic impersonating Gregory and identifies M.X.E.S. as part of the containment system.

Strong environmental or structural clues

  • The Dr. Scraptrap arcade artwork links the Pizzaplex’s entertainment material to the older Scraptrap name.
  • Princess Quest’s role in freeing Vanessa ties the arcade sequence to the Vanny-associated threat.
  • The altered Princess Quest III cabinet and comic material in Ruin support the Princess Quest continuity reading.

Claims that remain too strong

  • “Glitchtrap is conclusively William Afton’s soul” goes beyond what the games explicitly establish.
  • “Burntrap is definitely the exact Scraptrap body” treats visual resemblance as a confirmed identification.
  • “Every rabbit image is the same character” ignores the Mimic’s demonstrated ability to copy identities.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What is the clearest timeline for these names?

The following sequence keeps the forms distinct while preserving their possible relationships:

  1. William Afton becomes Springtrap: the human villain is trapped in a Spring Bonnie springlock suit.
  2. Afton appears as Scraptrap: Pizzeria Simulator shows a later, more damaged physical design, which fans call Scraptrap.
  3. Legacy data enters the virtual project: Help Wanted introduces the digital rabbit anomaly later called Glitchtrap.
  4. The Pizzaplex conflict unfolds: Security Breach expresses the threat through Vanny, Princess Quest and rabbit imagery, while Burntrap appears on one route as a physical enemy.
  5. The Mimic becomes explicit: Ruin reveals an entity that can copy Gregory and reframes earlier assumptions about who—or what—is speaking through the rabbit imagery.

This timeline describes appearances and evidence, not a fully solved genealogy. The games deliberately leave the transfer from Afton’s legacy to digital or imitative forms open to interpretation.

What wording is safest when explaining the lore?

Call Scraptrap “Afton’s damaged Spring Bonnie form,” Glitchtrap “the digital rabbit anomaly from Help Wanted,” and Burntrap “the physical rabbit antagonist on one Security Breach route.” If you need to discuss their relationship, say that they share Afton-coded imagery and may be connected through scanned data or Mimic imitation.

Avoid presenting the unresolved ontology as settled fact. The most accurate summary is that Scraptrap is an older physical Afton form, Glitchtrap is a digital anomaly, Burntrap is a route-specific physical threat, and the Mimic supplies a powerful modern explanation for copied Afton behavior. The overlap is intentional; the identities are not interchangeable.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do fans call Afton’s Pizzeria Simulator form “Scraptrap”?

The name is a fandom shorthand that distinguishes the heavily damaged rabbit redesign from Springtrap. It describes the character’s visual state rather than introducing a different human villain, and the Dr. Scraptrap arcade artwork is the notable Security Breach reference to that label.

Does Burntrap appear in every Security Breach ending?

No. Burntrap belongs to the underground route, while other endings branch away from that encounter. The presence of a Burntrap sequence therefore cannot, by itself, establish that every ending shares the same final events.

What is M.X.E.S. in Ruin?

M.X.E.S. is part of the security and containment system keeping the Mimic confined beneath the abandoned Pizzaplex. Its role is important because it shows that the modern threat is being managed as an entity capable of escape and deception, not simply as a static Afton costume.

Can the games prove that Glitchtrap is only the Mimic?

Not conclusively. The Mimic’s demonstrated copying ability makes it a strong explanation for Afton-like voices and behavior, but the series has not issued a definitive statement excluding scanned legacy data, an Afton-derived component or a composite interpretation.

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

BurntrapFive Nights at Freddy'sGlitchtrapScraptrapSecurity BreachThe Mimicvideo game lore

About the author

— The DocumentaryTube Team writes The Screening Room's guides, reviews and news, and keeps the directory's records of documentaries, their directors and where to watch them. How DocumentaryTube works.

More in Blog

Say something about this film

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?Free driver scan
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They SpreadFree repair scan

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.