What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Theranos promised that a small finger-stick blood sample could power a broad range of fast, reliable tests on the company’s own analyzers; the official record describes a much narrower and less reliable technology, alongside investor claims that prosecutors said Holmes knew were misleading. The distinction matters: a product that fails to perform as promised is not, by itself, proof of fraud. Holmes’s criminal convictions concerned investor-related wire fraud, while the jury acquitted her on the patient-related counts it decided.
What did Theranos promise?
Theranos, founded by Elizabeth Holmes, presented itself as a new kind of blood-testing company. Its central pitch was that proprietary devices could run a broad range of laboratory tests from a few drops of blood collected by a finger prick. In principle, the approach promised to make testing more convenient and potentially faster by reducing the need for larger blood draws and conventional laboratory processes.
The pitch was not merely that a small sample could be collected. Theranos represented that its own technology could reliably perform many different tests from that sample. That distinction is central to understanding the company’s collapse: a collection method, an analyzer’s actual capabilities, and a validated clinical test are not the same thing. The public record described a gap between the broad platform Theranos promoted and the limited capability of its proprietary analyzers.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →The Securities and Exchange Commission said Theranos, Holmes, and former president Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani raised more than $700 million from investors. The SEC’s 2018 account alleged that company leaders misrepresented the capabilities of the technology and the company’s business prospects. Those were SEC allegations in an enforcement action; the later criminal jury verdict against Holmes was narrower and concerned specific investor-related counts.
Popular on Amazon
- 【90 Degree Full Function USB C Adapter】Supports the latest USB4 standard for up to 40Gbps of bandwidth, 8K video support, and up to 240W Fast charging; Support USB PD 3.1 Extended Power Range (EPR) including 140W, 180W and 240W. Your productivity is easily doubled. *Warm Tip: For the best fit, please make sure the USB-C port is fully exposed; thick or bulky cases may affect compatibility.
- 【Reliable Quality】Made from high-quality, scratch-resistant aluminum alloy, delicate metal frame. get excellent wear resistance and heat dissipation. Non-Slip Design for easier insertion and removal.
- 【Small and portable】Ultra thin size, ultra compact design, a petite physique that matches the minimalist design of your modern laptops. Coming with a slim figure that won't block the port next to the one it's plugged into.
- 【Compatibility】Widely work with most usb c, thunderbolt 4/3 devices. Compatibilit for ROG Ally, Steam Deck, Switch, MacBook Pro, Quest 3 VR headset, Surface Book 2, iPhone 18/17/16/15, Samsung Galaxy S23/S22/S21, Note 20/10, Google Pixel, ChromeBook, etc.
- 【Excellence Customer Support】If you experience any issues or cable failure, simply reach out to our dedicated customer service team. We provide a prompt response within 18 hours, providing you with the necessary technical support to resolve any concerns.
What could the Theranos technology actually do?
According to the SEC, the proprietary analyzer could complete only a small number of tests, while most patient testing was performed on modified or industry-standard machines made by other companies. DOJ’s summary of trial evidence likewise describes the Theranos Sample Processing Unit, Edison, or minilab as limited in the number of tests it could perform and beset by accuracy and reliability problems. DOJ also said the devices were slower than some competing devices and that Holmes used conventional third-party machines for much of the testing.
These descriptions come from government accounts of the evidence and proceedings, not from a comprehensive laboratory audit reproduced here. They support a clear conclusion about the mismatch between the company’s broad public claims and the technology’s demonstrated limitations. They do not establish that every test result produced by Theranos was wrong, nor do the cited sources provide a single error rate that can be applied to all tests.
For a medical test to be useful, it is not enough for a machine to produce a number. The method must work consistently for the particular test, sample type, and conditions in which it is used. A device validated for a limited set of tests cannot simply be assumed to handle a much wider menu with the same accuracy. That is why the distinction between intended capability and demonstrated capability matters: the first is what a company says its product can do; the second is what evidence supports it doing reliably.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Theranos’s use of conventional analyzers is also important to interpreting its business pitch. A company can use third-party equipment as part of a legitimate service, but that is materially different from suggesting that its proprietary device is performing a broad range of tests. The SEC and DOJ accounts describe the use of other manufacturers’ machines for most testing, while the company’s public identity rested heavily on its own technology.
The available government summaries do not provide a full test-by-test comparison between Theranos devices and conventional laboratory systems. They also do not support a sweeping claim about patient outcomes or a universal failure rate. The soundest summary is therefore specific: Theranos promoted broad, reliable testing from small samples on its own analyzers, while the official record describes limited capability, reliability concerns, and substantial reliance on other machines.
Also popular on Amazon
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
What did Theranos tell investors?
The SEC’s 2018 release said Theranos raised more than $700 million from investors and described claims about the company’s technology and finances that it alleged were false or misleading. Among its examples, the SEC contrasted more than $100 million in projected 2014 revenue with a little more than $100,000 in 2014 operating revenue. These are figures reported by the SEC in its account of the alleged misrepresentations, not independently recalculated totals.
DOJ’s account of the trial evidence says investors were told to expect more than $100 million in 2014 revenue and approximately $1 billion in 2015. It also says the evidence showed Holmes knew revenues would be negligible or modest. Those projections help explain why the prosecution’s case was about more than whether a device worked: it argued that investors received false representations about both the technology and the company’s commercial prospects.
Financial figures from different stages of the case should not be treated as interchangeable. The SEC’s reported fundraising total describes money raised from investors. The district court later found that the loss for sentencing could reasonably be calculated as $120,146,247. HHS’s Office of Inspector General subsequently reported approximately $452,047,200 in restitution. The latter is a restitution figure; it is not the same thing as the district court’s sentencing loss calculation. Each number answers a different legal or administrative question.
The SEC’s civil case and DOJ’s criminal prosecution also serve different purposes and have different outcomes. The SEC announced fraud charges in 2018 against Theranos, Holmes, and Balwani. The criminal trial led to a jury verdict on counts against Holmes. When describing what was proven at that trial, it is more accurate to identify the specific counts and verdicts than to say generally that Holmes was convicted of defrauding everyone connected with Theranos.
What did the jury decide about Elizabeth Holmes?
In January 2022, the jury convicted Holmes of one conspiracy count and three wire-fraud counts involving investors. DOJ said those convictions concerned wire transfers totaling more than $140 million. The verdict was not a conviction on the patient-related fraud charges.
Also popular on Amazon
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
The jury acquitted Holmes of the conspiracy count related to patients and three patient-related wire-fraud counts. It did not reach unanimous verdicts on three other investor-related counts. A separate patient wire-fraud count was dismissed during trial. The split verdict is essential context: the prosecution presented allegations involving both investors and patients, but the jury’s convictions and acquittals were different for those groups.
A failed or unreliable product does not, on its own, prove intentional fraud. The criminal case required the jury to decide whether the government proved the charged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. The investor convictions reflect the jury’s finding on those specific charges; the patient acquittals mean Holmes was not convicted on the patient counts the jury decided. The unresolved counts were not verdicts of guilt or innocence.
In DOJ’s verdict release, FBI Special Agent in Charge Craig Fair said: “Elizabeth Holmes chose fraud over business failure. A jury has determined, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she intentionally misled investors.” That is Fair’s statement about the verdict, not a quotation from the court’s opinion. It captures the prosecution’s characterization of the investor convictions, but it should not replace the more precise account of which counts resulted in convictions, acquittals, or no verdict.
What sentence did Holmes receive, and what happened on appeal?
In November 2022, the district court sentenced Holmes to 135 months in prison—11 years and 3 months. The court’s sentencing order said the loss could reasonably be found to be $120,146,247 and that the offense involved 10 or more victims. Those are findings for sentencing purposes; they should not be confused with the amount raised by Theranos or with the later restitution reported by HHS-OIG.
The DOJ case page states that Holmes was ordered to surrender in April 2023. On February 24, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed her conviction, sentence, and restitution order. The appellate outcome means those district-court rulings remained in place. The cited sources do not establish a current release date, so a projected date should not be presented as a settled fact.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteAlso popular on Amazon
- Portable and powerful USB-C HUB: BENFEI USB Type-C HUB, with super-soft and knot-free silicone woven design cable, meets most mobile office needs. Compact, lightweight, stylish, and powerful portable USB C Hub equipped with 1 x HDMI port, 1 x 100W charging, and 3 x USB ports. 18-month warranty, 24-hour response, to ensure you feel at ease when using our product.
- Design centered on comfort and reliability: Thanks to BENFEI's end-to-end in-house cable production capability, in-house PCBA and assembly capability, using the industry's most advanced silicone woven design and process, 20cm cable in length, no knots, super-soft, the HUB is easy to use in all scenarios: laptop, tablet, stand etc. Super-soft, 25000+ life cycles, to meet your daily carrying and office needs.
- 100W Charging: Support up to 90W USB C pass-through charging via Type-C port to keep your laptop powered. 10W is reserved for other interface operations. No data and video function on the Type-C port.
- 4K HDMI Display: The HDMI port supports media display at resolutions up to 4K 30Hz, keeping every incredible moment detailed and ultra vivid. Please note that the C port of the Host device needs to support video output.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Transfer files and from your laptop at speeds up to 10 Gbps with USB A 3.2 port. Extra 2 USB A 2.0 ports are perfectly for your keyboards and mouse.
Separately, HHS-OIG imposed a 90-year exclusion barring Holmes from participation in federal health care programs and reported approximately $452,047,200 in restitution. HHS administrative proceedings address whether a person is excluded from those programs; they are not the same proceeding as the criminal trial. The administrative exclusion should not be used to rewrite the criminal jury’s patient-related acquittals. The legal records describe different decisions under different authorities.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why did Theranos fail?
The most direct explanation is the widening gap between what the company said its proprietary testing platform could do and what official accounts say it could demonstrate. Theranos’s identity and investor pitch centered on small-sample testing across a broad menu. The SEC and DOJ accounts describe limited capability in the company’s own analyzers, accuracy and reliability concerns, and extensive use of equipment made by other manufacturers.
That technical gap became a legal issue when prosecutors argued that Holmes knowingly misled investors about the technology and expected revenue. The jury’s investor convictions show that the government proved the charged investor-related offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. The patient-count acquittals, however, are a separate part of the verdict and must remain visible in any fair explanation of the case.
Theranos is therefore not best reduced to either “a startup whose technology did not work” or “a company convicted of harming patients.” The first formulation understates the investor-fraud verdict; the second overstates what the jury decided. A more accurate account keeps three questions distinct: what the company claimed, what its technology was described as capable of doing, and what the jury found about Holmes’s conduct toward investors and patients.
For documentary viewers, that distinction is useful when a narrative compresses a complicated case into a single turning point or villain-and-victim arc. The official records support a substantial mismatch between public claims and described technical capability, a criminal conviction for investor fraud, acquittals on specified patient-related counts, and later appellate affirmance. They do not supply a universal patient error rate or a finding that every test result was wrong.
Also popular on Amazon
- 【Read before You Buy】 Note: This adapter is USB 2.0 version and cannot transmit HDM, VGA, or other video signals. Nevertheless, they are fully capable of charging devices,duplicating files, and can be seamlessly integrated with USB-C earphones, wireless network adapters, and SD card adapters.
- 【Easy to Use and Safe】Thanks to modern manufacturing techniques, we've made these adapters sufficiently compact so that they can remain inserted in your device without noticeable protrusion or inconvenience. This means you don't have to constantly plug and unplug them, reducing the likelihood of wear and misalignment, and making them more convenient to carry around.
- 【Reliable Quality】Engineered for enhanced durability, durable aluminum alloy shell material,get excellent wear resistance and heat dissipation,the male USB C and female USB connectors & the male USB and female USB C connectors are designed to be plugged and unplugged up to 20000 times. Provides data transfer, device charging, memory space expansion, and additional computer peripherals.
- 【Think more for you】Do you need to connect a USB-C-enabled device to an odd device that only has USB-A ports? Then these USB-A male to USB-C female adapters are made for you.Simply insert the adapter into the USB-A port on the device, and you can instantly connect your USB-C device to the device that originally didn't have the correct connection port.
- 【Trusted xiwxi Quality and Service】As a responsible brand seller, you will receive xiwxi's 12-month Quality assurance and lifetime friendly customer service, you're not just buying a product,you're investing in peace of mind with all-round quality and exceptional customer service.
Which official records explain the case?
The SEC’s 2018 release is useful for the agency’s account of fundraising, technology claims, and the 2014 revenue contrast. The DOJ verdict announcement summarizes the jury’s convictions, acquittals, and unresolved counts, while the DOJ case page provides procedural information.
The district court’s sentencing order is the primary source for the sentence and sentencing loss calculation. The Ninth Circuit opinion documents the appellate decision. HHS-OIG’s exclusion announcement and the HHS Departmental Appeals Board decision explain the separate health-program exclusion matter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Holmes’s investor-fraud conviction mean the Theranos tests were all fake?
No. The conviction concerned specific investor-related fraud counts, not a jury finding that every test was fabricated or wrong. The government summaries describe limited analyzer capabilities and reliability problems, but do not give a comprehensive error rate for all Theranos testing.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Why did Holmes face a health-program exclusion after the patient acquittals?
The exclusion was an administrative action by HHS-OIG, separate from the criminal jury’s verdict. The HHS materials discuss how the agency applied federal health-program rules to Holmes’s investor-fraud conviction; that action does not alter the acquittals on patient-related criminal counts.
Is the $452 million restitution amount the same as the court’s loss figure?
No. The district court’s sentencing order said the loss could reasonably be calculated at $120,146,247. HHS-OIG later reported approximately $452,047,200 in restitution, a distinct figure from a different legal context.
Did the jury reach a decision on every charge against Holmes?
No. Besides the investor convictions and patient-related acquittals, jurors could not agree on three investor-related counts, and another patient wire-fraud count was dismissed during trial. An unresolved count is not a conviction or an acquittal.
Say something about this film