Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →The March 18, 2024, post in r/TrueUnpopularOpinion is one person’s opinion, not an objective verdict on Jimmy Kimmel or proof that the view is unpopular. Its central complaint is that Kimmel can come across as smug, especially in political monologues focused on Donald Trump and partisan conflict. The comments also push back: some find him funny in interviews, reject the examples, or simply disagree about what makes comedy work.
What the post means by “isn’t funny”
The title bundles together two different judgments: that Kimmel’s comedy does not land, and that his public manner feels unpleasant. In the thread, “smug” and “preachy” are recurring descriptions. They are commenters’ impressions, not established facts about Kimmel’s character.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Serious Goose | $10.01 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
JIMMY KIMMEL: Late-Night Wit and the Making of a Comedy Powerhouse” | $28.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Fame: Jimmy Kimmel | $8.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Biography of Jimmy Kimmel: More Than Just Comedy – The Inspirational Journey of a Man Who Brought... | $29.99 | Buy on Amazon |
Several replies distinguish the format from the person. Kimmel is primarily discussed as a late-night host, not assessed through a body of stand-up performances. Some participants say his humor varies by segment: interviews can work for them even when the monologues do not. Others object that the post’s examples are weak or that teasing celebrities is a normal part of comedy.
Why the political monologues draw criticism
The most repeated complaint is that Kimmel’s opening monologues lean too heavily on Donald Trump and Democratic-versus-Republican politics. Critics say the material can feel like partisan commentary delivered to an approving audience, with applause standing in for a joke. That is a reaction to the style and target selection described by commenters; the thread does not establish how often this happens or measure audience response.
#1 Best Overall
- Like new. The morror protective film is still in place. Dust jacket intact. First Edition.
A related Reddit discussion compares Kimmel and Stephen Colbert’s political emphasis with Jimmy Fallon’s comparatively less political approach. It reflects commenters’ impressions of the hosts’ styles, not a systematic comparison of their programs.
| Comparison point | What the Reddit discussions suggest |
|---|---|
| Political intensity | Commenters describe Kimmel and Colbert as more focused on partisan politics than Fallon. |
| Monologue structure | Critics say Kimmel’s Trump-centered openings can feel more like political commentary than joke-driven comedy. |
| Interviews and other segments | Some commenters say Kimmel can be funny in interviews even if they dislike his monologues. |
| Authenticity and manner | “Smug” or “self-righteous” is a recurring perception among critics, while other participants reject that characterization. |
| Humor versus offense | Some participants object to the examples; others regard celebrity teasing as part of comedy. |
Why commenters bring up The Man Show
Some participants frame Kimmel’s current public image as an advocate on social issues against recollections of his earlier work on The Man Show. They invoke alleged objectification of women and blackface sketches to argue that the contrast looks hypocritical. Those are commenters’ assertions and recollections in this thread, not independently verified findings established by the discussion. The thread alone cannot settle what happened in particular sketches or how Kimmel’s views have changed.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Is this actually an unpopular opinion?
The thread shows that the criticism exists and that it resonated with some participants; it also includes disagreement and qualifications. It does not provide a representative poll, audience survey, or evidence that the opinion is either widely held or rare. A separate Los Angeles Reddit anecdote recounts meeting Kimmel at a UCLA charity event and finding him very nice. That account offers a positive personal impression, not proof of what he is like in general.
The most defensible reading is narrower than the title: some viewers dislike Kimmel’s perceived smugness and politically focused monologues, while others value different parts of his show or reject the criticism. Whether he is funny depends on the viewer and the segment being judged; the thread cannot turn that subjective question into a universal conclusion.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsQuick Recap
Rank #3
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
