What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Yes, people in several societies consumed human flesh, but “cannibalism” describes different behaviors rather than one universal custom. Archaeologists distinguish survival consumption, violence, ritual acts and mortuary endocannibalism by combining bone damage, site context, historical testimony and, in one modern case, disease epidemiology.
The strongest cases show several processing marks together—cutting, peeling, percussion breakage, burning or cooking, toothmarks and deliberate skeletal selection. Colonial reports, especially those concerning the Aztec/Mexica, require a different and more cautious standard than directly observed bone modification.
How to read the evidence
A cut mark on a human bone is not, by itself, proof that someone ate the person. Similar marks can result from dismemberment, defleshing for burial or later disturbance. A 2024 review recommends evaluating eight taphonomic traits together with the location of marks, breakage patterns, burning, skeletal representation and the surrounding deposits. The question is whether human remains were processed like food animals and whether the site context supports consumption.
The confidence labels in this article refer to the evidence for a particular episode, not to every person in a named population:
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
- Strong archaeological support: several matching processing traces occur on human and animal bones, with context consistent with consumption.
- Supported but limited: the traces are persuasive, but the sample is small or the interpretation remains debated.
- Contested historical claim: testimony exists, yet attribution, scale or independent osteological confirmation is uncertain.
- Documented mortuary practice: historical observation and epidemiology establish a practice that later ceased; it should not be generalized to living descendants.
| Case | Social context indicated by the evidence | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Homo antecessor, Gran Dolina | Consumptive processing; motive unresolved | Strong archaeological support |
| Neanderthals, Krapina | Possible processing of bodies | Supported but limited |
| Ancestral Puebloans, Chaco Canyon | Possible violent or mortuary episode | Supported but debated |
| Aztec/Mexica communities | Reported sacrificial and ritual consumption | Contested historical claim |
| Navatu, Fiji | Food-like processing in midden deposits | Strong archaeological support |
| Fore and neighboring groups | Mortuary endocannibalism | Documented mortuary practice |
| El Mirador, Early Bronze Age | Local, exceptional episode; conflict possible | Strong archaeological support |
| El Mirador, Neolithic | Separate local episode; motive unresolved | Supported archaeological episode |
1. Homo antecessor at Gran Dolina, Spain: about 780,000 years ago
What was found
At least six individuals were mixed with animal bones and stone tools in the Gran Dolina deposits at Atapuerca. Human bones carry cutmarks, peeling, percussion damage and chopmarks comparable to the traces left when carcasses are butchered. The assemblage lacks an arrangement suggesting a formal ritual display.
What it means
Fernández-Jalvo and colleagues concluded in 1999 that the remains “suggest that it is solely the result of consumptive activities as there is no evidence of ritual or other intention.” That wording supports consumption, not a specific explanation for why it happened. A later analysis of the approximately 0.9-million-year-old TD6.2 assemblage describes it as “the oldest known case of cannibalism to date” and notes that hominins are overrepresented as prey. The two dates reflect different analyses and layers discussed for Gran Dolina; neither identifies a motive such as famine, warfare or ceremony.
Confidence: Strong archaeological support for consumption; motive open.
2. Neanderthals at Krapina Cave, Croatia: Pleistocene
The bone evidence
More than 800 Neanderthal bones from Krapina include cut marks and hammerstone fragments. Such damage is consistent with deliberate processing, and the site has long appeared in discussions of Neanderthal cannibalism.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Why the conclusion is limited
The evidence does not show that all Neanderthals, or even every individual at Krapina, practiced cannibalism. Defleshing for other purposes, post-depositional damage and incomplete recovery must be considered. The Australian Museum presents Krapina as evidence discussed in the literature rather than proof of a universal Neanderthal custom.
Confidence: Supported but limited to an interpreted episode at one Pleistocene site.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
3. Ancestral Puebloans at Chaco Canyon: prehistoric North American Southwest
Small House charnel pit
A study of the Small House charnel pit identifies six categories of perimortem damage that researchers regard as a taphonomic signature of prehistoric cannibalism. “Perimortem” means the bone was damaged while still fresh or near the time of death, when it could fracture and mark in ways unlike dry, ancient bone.
Interpretive boundaries
The older label “Anasazi” appears in earlier literature, but Ancestral Puebloans is the preferred modern archaeological term. The Chaco finding concerns a particular deposit; it cannot be generalized to every Pueblo community. Scholars continue to debate whether the damage records consumption, extreme violence, mortuary treatment or a combination of behaviors. The site context is therefore as important as the marks themselves.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Confidence: Supported but debated for the Small House episode; no basis for labeling all Ancestral Puebloans cannibals.
4. Aztec/Mexica communities in central Mexico: pre-Conquest and early colonial records
What the documents claim
Early colonial writers reported sacrificial cannibalism among Aztec, or Mexica, communities. A study of 1577–1586 Relaciones Geográficas records allegations in 40 of 105 reports. Only 18 of those 40 allegations were attributed directly to Indigenous informants, showing how often the claim was transmitted through uncertain channels.
Food supply, ritual and political context
Bernard Ortiz de Montellano argued that reported episodes coincided with harvests. Tribute networks and intensive chinampa agriculture could supply substantial food, making protein shortage a weak explanation for a city with those resources. On that reading, communion with gods and sacrificial ritual offer a better account of why consumption might be reported. This remains an interpretation of historical evidence, not a measurement of how widespread the practice was.
The missing osteological confirmation
A recent review notes that osteological evidence of cannibalism has not been identified on human remains associated with Aztec sacrifices. That absence does not prove the accounts false, but it prevents the documents from being treated as independently confirmed at every site. Claims must be assessed for who made them, when, for what audience and under what colonial political pressures.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Confidence: Contested historical claim; scale and reliability remain unresolved.
5. Navatu, Fiji: deposits dated 50 BC–AD 1900
Processing traces in a midden
Human and animal bones in the Navatu midden show matching patterns of ancient breakage, burning, crushing, cutmarks, peeling and percussion pits. William DeGusta reported ancient breaks on 92% of human specimens, burning on 29% and cutmarks on 9%. The combination resembles carcass processing rather than an isolated act of defleshing.
Burials provide a control
Formal burials at the same site are largely unmodified. That contrast helps separate the midden’s butchery pattern from ordinary mortuary handling and is one reason the osteological study supports cannibalism.
Confidence: Strong archaeological support for consumption in the midden deposits; the evidence does not make every Fijian community or period equivalent.
6. Fore and neighboring groups in Papua New Guinea: twentieth-century mortuary feasts
Endocannibalism and kuru
Among Fore and neighboring groups, endocannibalism meant consuming deceased relatives during mortuary feasts. Medical investigations linked the practice to kuru, a fatal prion disease. The kuru epidemic peaked in the late 1950s and declined after mortuary consumption stopped. As one study states, kuru “was transmitted during the transumption (endocannibalism) of dead family members at mortuary feasts.”
Why this case is different
This is not an archaeological claim about an ancient empire. It is a documented twentieth-century mortuary practice supported by observed customs, clinical patterns and the epidemiological change that followed cessation. The practice ended; describing it does not justify treating Fore people today as inherently cannibalistic.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
Confidence: Documented mortuary practice, historically bounded and no longer customary.
7. Early Bronze Age people at El Mirador Cave, Iberia: 4600–4100 calibrated years BP
Six individuals and food-processing damage
Six Early Bronze Age individuals at El Mirador show cutmarks, human toothmarks, cooking damage and deliberate breakage. Together, these traces support gastronomic cannibalism more strongly than any single mark could.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Local and exceptional, not a famine routine
The 2025 analysis describes the episode as local and exceptional. It finds no signal that a broad famine forced repeated consumption and suggests intergroup violence as a possible setting. The people whose remains were consumed appear to have local origins, so the episode need not be explained as the aftermath of a distant raid or migration.
Confidence: Strong archaeological support for an isolated consumptive episode; conflict is possible, not demonstrated.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.8. Neolithic people at El Mirador Cave, Iberia: 5709–5573 calibrated years BP
A separate event in the same cave
El Mirador also preserves an earlier Neolithic episode dated 5709–5573 calibrated years BP. Bayesian analysis separates it from the Early Bronze Age remains. Treating all the cave’s human bones as one event would therefore combine people who lived thousands of years apart.
What can and cannot be inferred
The analysis reports local origins for the cannibalized individuals and no famine signal. It confirms that consumption occurred in this earlier episode but does not establish a single motive. The two El Mirador events are a practical warning: one site can preserve multiple episodes with different dates, participants and causes.
Recommended Free Tools
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
Confidence: Supported archaeological episode; motive unresolved and independent from the later Bronze Age event.
Was cannibalism caused by famine, religion or violence?
There is no single answer. Gran Dolina and Navatu show food-like processing but do not identify a motive. The El Mirador episodes lack a famine signal; the Bronze Age analysis raises intergroup violence as a possibility. The Fore case was mortuary and relational, not a response to hunger. Aztec accounts are framed in sacrificial and religious terms, yet their historical reliability and scale are disputed. Chaco Canyon and Krapina remain interpretations of incomplete archaeological records.
Researchers therefore separate what happened to the bones from why people did it. Taphonomy can establish processing and, sometimes, consumption. It rarely identifies a belief system by itself. Motive requires independent context such as burial treatment, settlement history, food availability, warfare indicators, written testimony or epidemiological evidence.
How archaeologists decide that consumption occurred
- Document the marks: map cutmarks, peeling, percussion pits, chopmarks, toothmarks, burning and cooking alteration.
- Check fracture mechanics: fresh bone breaks and marrow access patterns differ from dry-bone damage and many forms of accidental breakage.
- Compare species: matching treatment of human and animal remains strengthens a carcass-processing interpretation.
- Assess skeletal selection: which body parts are present, missing or overrepresented can indicate transport, dismemberment and consumption choices.
- Reconstruct the deposit: midden refuse, charnel pits, hearths, burials and later disturbance carry different implications.
- Test competing explanations: ritual defleshing, secondary burial, warfare, scavenging and excavation damage must be considered before naming cannibalism.
- Separate episodes: radiocarbon dates and stratigraphy can reveal repeated events at one site, as at El Mirador.
- State confidence narrowly: conclude that an episode supports consumption rather than claiming an entire culture practiced cannibalism.
What these eight cases show
The oldest evidence in this set comes from Gran Dolina, roughly 780,000 years ago, with a later TD6.2 analysis reaching approximately 0.9 million years. The cases then extend through the Pleistocene, prehistoric Iberia and the American Southwest, early colonial Mexico, Fiji deposits spanning 50 BC to AD 1900 and a twentieth-century epidemic in Papua New Guinea.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsThey also demonstrate why the headline “ancient cultures that practiced cannibalism” needs qualification. Some records concern one exceptional event, some a debated interpretation and one a historically documented mortuary custom that ended. The most defensible conclusion is not that whole peoples were defined by cannibalism, but that human consumption occurred in varied circumstances—and that the confidence of each claim depends on the kind of evidence available.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Say something about this film