The “46” is a historical count, not a live total. Christopher Campbell’s Nonfics article, published January 11, 2017, revisited a slate of announced dramatic adaptations of documentaries and focused on projects that had not yet come to fruition at the time. Its introduction also acknowledged successes, including Man on Wire being remade as The Walk. Because the article’s full list is gated and project-by-project updates are not available on the page, no responsible 2026 account can claim that all 46 remain unreleased—or say how many eventually were completed.
What the list captures is a recurring Hollywood pattern: a documentary attracts attention, producers announce a fictional remake, and the project then spends years in development, changes form, or disappears. Ross McElwee’s Sherman’s March provides an especially revealing example. A proposed dramatic remake did not become the expected feature; instead, McElwee made another documentary, Remake, about the proposal and the personal history around it.
What the 46-project list actually represents
Campbell’s article is a retrospective snapshot of development announcements, not a database of released films. The January 11, 2017 publication date matters because “still haven’t happened” describes the situation being discussed then. It does not establish a permanent verdict on every title.
The article’s premise is the movement of documentary stories into scripted cinema. A producer might announce an option, a rights acquisition, a writer, a director, or a cast attachment. Those events can make a remake sound imminent while leaving the project far from production. Campbell’s introduction also notes that some projects on the broader slate had already reached audiences, using the transformation of Man on Wire into The Walk as an example.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →#1 Best Overall
The full Nonfics list is not exposed in the publicly viewable portion of the page used for this article. That means the names, announcement dates, contracts, attachments and later outcomes of all 46 entries cannot be independently presented here as verified facts. The useful conclusion is therefore narrower and more accurate: the article documents how many documentary-remake promises were circulating by 2017, while leaving their later histories to be checked one project at a time.
What “promised remake” means in practice
“Promised” is an editorial description of expectation, not a production category. A remake can pass through several public milestones before a camera rolls. Treating those milestones as interchangeable is the fastest way to mistake a rights announcement for a finished movie.
An announcement
A studio, producer or filmmaker may publicly say that a documentary is being adapted. This establishes an intention and gives the project visibility. It does not prove that the underlying rights have been secured, that financing exists, or that a screenplay has been approved.
Rights option or acquisition
An option gives a producer the right to pursue an adaptation for a defined period; an acquisition transfers or licenses rights under the relevant agreement. Either can lapse without a release. A rights deal is evidence of a legal step, not evidence that production will follow.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteCreative attachments
A named writer, director or actor can help a project attract financing, but attachments change. People leave, schedules collide and scripts are rewritten. A cast announcement should be read as a development signal unless production or distribution is separately confirmed.
Rank #2
Script, pilot or production date
A completed screenplay, a commissioned pilot, a dated production start or an announced distributor represents a later stage than a general remake announcement. Even then, the project can be delayed or abandoned. The only unambiguous endpoint is a verifiable release or festival premiere.
Why the distinction matters
The 2017 article’s language points to projects that had not come to fruition, but it does not turn every unmade title into a cancellation. “Stalled,” “in development,” “canceled” and “unknown” describe different levels of evidence. A careful update preserves those differences rather than forcing every project into a yes-or-no answer.
Why documentary remakes so often remain in development
The documentary-to-drama path carries unusual creative and financial decisions. A documentary may be built around an actual person’s unpredictable behavior, a journalist’s access, or an essayistic structure. A scripted remake must decide what can be dramatized, whose viewpoint governs the story and how much invention is acceptable. Those decisions can produce a compelling screenplay—or reveal that the original film’s power depended on the very reality that cannot be recreated.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Rights and consent
Documentaries can involve many rights holders: filmmakers, subjects, broadcasters, archives, music owners and estates. A producer may control the adaptation rights to the film but still need permissions for people, recordings or underlying events. Negotiations can extend development or narrow what the remake is allowed to portray.
Financing and market fit
An announcement creates attention, not a budget. Investors and distributors must decide whether an audience will pay to see a fictional version of a story that already exists as nonfiction. A project can be creatively supported yet unable to assemble the financing required for production.
Rank #3
Creative turnover
Remakes often move between writers, directors and actors. Each change can restart development, alter the tone or require a new script. Public references to a project may therefore remain visible long after the version that inspired the announcement has been discarded.
The documentary’s resistance to conversion
Some documentaries are observational, fragmented or rooted in a filmmaker’s personal presence. Their structure may not map neatly onto a conventional dramatic arc. A fictional adaptation can preserve events while losing the uncertainty, performance or intimacy that made the documentary distinctive. Producers may ultimately decide that the original is the better finished work.
Time itself changes the proposition
A project announced in one cultural moment can look different years later. Subjects age, legal circumstances shift, news cycles move on and the filmmakers’ priorities change. A long development period is not proof of failure, but it is a reason to treat old announcements cautiously.
How to evaluate a promised remake without overstating its status
Readers trying to update the 2017 slate should apply the same questions to every title. Consistency matters more than a dramatic headline.
- Record the original announcement date. Identify who announced the project and what was actually promised.
- Separate rights from production. Note whether the report described an option, an acquisition, a script commission or only an intention to adapt.
- Track named personnel. List writers, directors, producers and cast only when a source explicitly attached them.
- Look for a concrete production signal. A dated shoot, financing announcement, distributor, festival selection or production-company confirmation is stronger evidence than a recycled logline.
- Confirm the latest outcome. Use “released” only for a verifiable public screening or distribution; use “active development” when a recent, specific update exists; use “stalled” when the last meaningful report is old and no cancellation is documented; use “canceled” only when a credible source says so; and use “unknown” when the trail cannot be established.
- Keep dates attached to claims. A project can be active in one year and dormant in the next, so every status needs a date and a source.
This method prevents a common error: counting every old announcement as an unmade film while also treating every rights deal as a completed adaptation. It produces a more useful history than a single completion percentage, especially when the original article does not expose all 46 entries for review.
Sherman’s March: when the failed remake becomes the story
Ross McElwee’s Sherman’s March demonstrates why development histories can outlive the proposed remake. PBS POV describes McElwee’s later film Remake as following outside producers who approached him about making a dramatic version of his 1985 documentary. The proposal became part of McElwee’s own subject matter rather than a straightforward route to a fictional feature.
| Moment | What is documented |
|---|---|
| 1985 | McElwee’s documentary Sherman’s March is the source film discussed by POV. |
| Proposal stage | Outside producers approached McElwee with a proposed dramatic remake; the cited description does not give a proposal date. |
| 2025 | Remake premiered in the out-of-competition section of the Venice International Film Festival, according to the Biennale’s official program. |
| August 27, 2026 | American Documentary announced that POV would present Remake. |
| 2026 | POV presented Remake, which examines the proposal alongside McElwee’s family footage and his relationship with his son Adrian. |
The distinction is essential: Remake is not the dramatic remake of Sherman’s March. POV identifies it as a film about the proposed remake and the surrounding personal story. American Documentary describes it as drawing on decades of family footage and focusing on McElwee’s relationship with Adrian. The Venice listing independently confirms the 2025 festival premiere and the father-son relationship at the center of the film.
Why this case is different from a conventional cancellation
A canceled or stalled adaptation usually leaves a gap between the announcement and the audience. McElwee filled that gap with another nonfiction work. The unrealized remake became a subject through which he could examine authorship, family, aging and the pressure to turn lived experience into a commercial narrative.
That turn also shows why a status label alone can be inadequate. If a researcher records only “dramatic remake not released,” the history appears to end in failure. The later documentary supplies a different outcome: the proposal generated a completed film, just not the one originally imagined by the outside producers.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What can be concluded about the 46 projects—and what cannot
Conclusions supported by the 2017 framing
- The “46” belongs to Christopher Campbell’s January 11, 2017 Nonfics article.
- The article concerns announced dramatic adaptations of documentaries that had not yet come to fruition at publication.
- The introduction acknowledges exceptions, including Man on Wire becoming The Walk.
- A proposal or rights arrangement should not be counted as a completed remake.
Claims that require separate verification
- How many of the 46 projects were eventually released.
- Which titles remain active, stalled or canceled in October 2026.
- Whether a later production used the original documentary’s title, story or only its underlying rights.
- Whether an announced cast, writer or director stayed attached through production.
No completion rate can be calculated from the article’s headline or introduction. The public page does not reveal enough of the list to support a contemporary total, and the passage of time makes project-specific checking indispensable.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Best Value
A practical checklist for readers, writers and programmers
When you encounter a claim that a documentary is “being remade,” ask:
- Is the item an announcement, an option, an acquisition, a script, a casting report or a production?
- Who made the announcement, and on what date?
- Does the report identify a writer, director, producer or distributor?
- Is there evidence of filming, a festival booking or a public release?
- Could the project have changed title or format?
- Is the latest information recent enough to describe the project as active?
- Would “unknown” be more accurate than “canceled” when no definitive statement exists?
Applying those questions to the 2017 slate turns a catchy list into a reliable film-history exercise. It also leaves room for outcomes that do not fit a simple remake narrative, such as Remake, where an unrealized dramatic adaptation produced a new documentary instead.
The lasting lesson of Hollywood’s remake promises
The value of the 46-project idea is not a definitive tally of failures. It is a record of how quickly development news can become part of film culture, even when the announced movie never reaches a screen. Documentary remakes sit between rights business, creative interpretation and historical memory. Some become released features; some remain scripts or options; some disappear; and a few, like the Sherman’s March example, return as documentaries about the attempt itself.
Read Campbell’s list as a dated map of promises made by January 2017. Treat every later status as a separate fact requiring its own confirmation. That approach preserves what the article can tell us without pretending that an old development slate is a current database.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Say something about this film