Stephen King’s Christine Remake: Plot, Cast, and Everything Else We Know

Stephen King’s Christine has never really left the pop-culture bloodstream, but its return now says a lot about where horror and Hollywood currently intersect. John Carpenter’s 1983 adaptation turned a pulpy high-concept novel into a sleek, synth-soaked classic, one that helped define the era’s studio horror ambitions. Four decades later, nostalgia, recognizable IP, and a renewed respect for King’s deeper thematic work have aligned to make a remake feel not just inevitable, but timely.

The modern remake boom has increasingly favored stories with simple hooks and psychological depth, and Christine remains deceptively rich beneath its killer-car premise. At its core, the story is about obsession, masculinity, control, and the seductive pull of power, themes that resonate differently in an age shaped by technology, isolation, and identity anxiety. A sentient automobile may sound retro, but the idea of an object shaping its owner’s personality feels eerily contemporary.

#	Preview	Product	Price
1		Christine	$18.99	Buy on Amazon
2		Classic King Boxed Set 1: Christine, Cujo, Pet Sematary	$34.50	Buy on Amazon
3		Christine by Stephen King (2011-10-13)	$24.99	Buy on Amazon
4		Christine	$24.48	Buy on Amazon
5		Christine by King, Stephen (1991) Hardcover	$45.48	Buy on Amazon

King’s enduring appeal also plays a decisive role in why Christine is being revived now. Recent adaptations like It, Doctor Sleep, and The Outsider have reinforced his reliability as both a commercial brand and a serious storyteller, encouraging studios to revisit titles that once seemed fully explored. With a new creative team promising a fresh perspective, Christine’s legacy isn’t being overwritten so much as reexamined, setting the stage for an update that aims to honor the past while speaking directly to today’s horror audience.

The Story Approach: How the Remake Plans to Reinterpret King’s Killer Car Mythology

Rather than simply modernizing the surface details, the Christine remake is positioned as a reexamination of what the killer car represents in Stephen King’s mythology. The creative team has repeatedly framed the project as less about spectacle and more about obsession, identity, and the corrosive nature of control. That approach suggests a film that treats Christine not just as a supernatural threat, but as an extension of her owner’s worst impulses.

#1 Best Overall

Sale

Christine

$18.99

Buy on Amazon

This is a crucial distinction from John Carpenter’s adaptation, which leaned heavily into style, iconography, and operatic menace. The remake appears intent on digging deeper into the psychological feedback loop between car and driver, reframing the horror as something intimate and emotionally invasive rather than purely external.

A Shift Toward Psychological Horror Over Mechanical Shock

In King’s novel, Christine’s influence unfolds gradually, warping Arnie Cunningham’s sense of self long before the body count rises. The remake is expected to restore that slow-burn descent, emphasizing emotional dependency and social isolation over jump scares. The horror, by design, comes from watching a vulnerable character lose autonomy while believing they are gaining power.

This aligns with modern horror trends that favor character-first storytelling, where the supernatural element amplifies real-world anxieties. Christine is less a possessed object than a seductive force, offering confidence, protection, and belonging at a devastating cost.

Reframing Masculinity, Power, and Obsession for a Modern Audience

One of the remake’s most intriguing opportunities lies in how it updates the story’s exploration of masculinity. Arnie’s transformation has always been tied to insecurity, resentment, and a desire for dominance, themes that resonate differently in a post-social-media, hyper-surveilled world. Early commentary around the project suggests the film may interrogate these ideas more directly, treating Christine as a symbol of toxic empowerment rather than simple wish fulfillment.

This reframing allows the story to engage with contemporary conversations about identity, entitlement, and emotional repression. Christine becomes a mirror, reflecting what her owner wants to be and exposing the damage that pursuit causes to everyone around them.

The Car as Character, Not Just Monster

The remake is also expected to lean harder into Christine’s personality, reinforcing her role as a manipulative presence rather than a mute killing machine. In King’s book, the car exerts control subtly, through influence and psychological pressure as much as supernatural violence. Translating that dynamic to screen opens the door for a more unsettling, almost intimate form of horror.

Instead of relying solely on visual spectacle, the film can explore how Christine communicates dominance through silence, persistence, and inevitability. That approach positions the car as a true character within the story, one whose relationship with its owner is as emotionally charged as any human connection.

Honoring the Original While Breaking Free From It

Importantly, the remake does not appear interested in recreating Carpenter’s film beat for beat. The goal, according to those involved, is to return to King’s thematic core while allowing the story to evolve beyond its 1980s trappings. That means respecting the iconography without being constrained by it, and finding new ways to make Christine feel dangerous in a world where technology already shapes identity and behavior.

By treating the mythology as flexible rather than fixed, the remake positions itself as a reinterpretation rather than a replacement. If successful, it could stand alongside the original as a distinct, character-driven take on one of King’s most deceptively complex monsters.

Confirmed Creative Team: Director, Writers, Producers, and Their Horror Credentials

Behind the camera, Christine’s remake is being shaped less by a single auteur than by a carefully curated horror pedigree. While some key roles remain in flux, the names officially attached to the project signal a clear intent: this is not a prestige-lite reboot, but a genre-forward reinterpretation guided by people who understand how King’s stories work on screen.

Director: Still Unannounced, by Design

As of now, no director has been officially confirmed for Christine. The project was originally announced with Bryan Fuller attached as both writer and director, but he departed the film during early development, reportedly due to creative differences over tone and approach.

Since then, Sony and Blumhouse have remained deliberate about naming a replacement, suggesting the studio is prioritizing alignment with the story’s darker psychological ambitions. The absence of a confirmed director does not indicate trouble so much as selectiveness, especially given the property’s legacy and the high bar set by Carpenter’s original film.

Writers: Resetting the Screenplay

Fuller’s exit also left the screenplay open-ended, and no new writer has been formally announced. What is known is that the script is being reworked from the ground up rather than lightly revised, reinforcing the idea that this remake is a thematic reexamination rather than a cosmetic update.

That reset aligns with the stated goal of returning to Stephen King’s novel for inspiration, particularly its more interior, psychologically driven elements. Whoever ultimately takes on writing duties will be tasked with translating obsession, insecurity, and emotional corrosion into cinematic language without leaning too heavily on nostalgia.

Producers: Blumhouse and John Carpenter Anchor the Film

The most concrete and confidence-inspiring aspect of the creative team sits at the producer level. Jason Blum is producing through Blumhouse, a studio synonymous with modern horror success thanks to franchises like Halloween, The Invisible Man, and The Black Phone. Blumhouse’s model, which emphasizes creative freedom and genre integrity over inflated budgets, is especially well-suited to a character-driven horror story like Christine.

Rank #2

Sale

Classic King Boxed Set 1: Christine, Cujo, Pet Sematary

$34.50

Buy on Amazon

Equally significant is John Carpenter’s involvement as an executive producer. Carpenter directed the 1983 original, and while his role does not involve day-to-day creative control, his presence carries symbolic and practical weight. In recent years, Carpenter has been selective about returning to his classic properties, lending credibility and continuity to remakes such as Halloween. His endorsement suggests that the new Christine respects the spirit of the original while embracing reinterpretation.

Together, this producing team establishes a strong foundation, even as other creative roles are finalized. With Blumhouse steering the production and Carpenter safeguarding the legacy, the remake is positioned to balance reverence with reinvention rather than choosing one at the expense of the other.

Casting Status: Confirmed Roles, Rumored Actors, and What the New Arnie Might Look Like

With the creative reset still underway, casting for the Christine remake remains deliberately fluid. As of now, no actors have been officially announced for any roles, signaling that the production is waiting for the screenplay and directorial vision to fully lock before committing to faces. For a character-driven horror story like this, that patience is more strategic than concerning.

Blumhouse has historically favored casting that serves character authenticity over marquee value, especially in films anchored by psychological transformation. That approach suggests Christine is unlikely to hinge on stunt casting, even for its most iconic roles.

Confirmed Casting: None Yet, by Design

There are currently no confirmed cast members attached to Christine, including the central role of Arnie Cunningham. While that may frustrate fans eager for updates, it aligns with the film’s broader restart following Bryan Fuller’s exit and the screenplay overhaul.

This clean slate gives the production flexibility to shape performances around the final thematic focus, rather than forcing characters to fit pre-cast personas. It also keeps expectations open, an advantage for a remake attempting to step out from the shadow of an enduring cult classic.

Rumored Actors and Industry Chatter

Despite occasional online speculation, no credible trade publications have reported on specific actors being in talks for Christine. Any names circulating on social media should be treated as fan casting rather than informed leaks, particularly since Blumhouse typically moves quietly until deals are finalized.

What has emerged instead is a general sense of the type of talent being considered. Insiders suggest the studio is looking at younger actors with strong dramatic range rather than established horror icons, emphasizing emotional vulnerability and volatility over familiarity.

Reimagining Arnie Cunningham for a Modern Audience

Arnie Cunningham remains the most crucial casting decision the film will make. In Stephen King’s novel, Arnie is not simply awkward or nerdy; he is deeply insecure, socially isolated, and emotionally combustible, traits that gradually curdle into obsession once Christine enters his life.

A modern Arnie will likely skew closer to King’s original depiction than the comparatively subdued portrayal in the 1983 film. Expect an actor capable of conveying introversion, suppressed anger, and a slow, unsettling shift toward dominance, someone who can make the transformation feel tragic rather than merely shocking.

Age will also matter. While the character is canonically a teenager, the remake may opt for an actor in their early twenties to balance authenticity with the psychological weight the role demands. Whoever lands the part will need to carry the film, grounding the supernatural elements in a painfully human descent.

What About Leigh, Dennis, and Christine Herself?

Supporting roles like Leigh Cabot and Dennis Guilder will be equally important in shaping the remake’s emotional ecosystem. Leigh, in particular, may receive expanded depth as the story leans further into obsession and emotional erosion, potentially reframing her not just as a love interest, but as a moral counterweight to Arnie’s unraveling.

And then there is Christine. While technically not a casting role, the car’s presence is inseparable from performance, relying on sound design, cinematography, and physical staging to convey personality. With modern filmmaking tools at its disposal, the remake has an opportunity to make Christine feel less like a possessed object and more like an active, manipulative force.

Until casting announcements arrive, Christine remains defined more by intention than by faces. But that restraint, much like the car itself waiting in the shadows, suggests a production that understands the power of timing.

How This Version Will Differ from John Carpenter’s 1983 Film

John Carpenter’s Christine remains a landmark of restrained, atmospheric horror, but it was also very much a product of its era. The upcoming remake is not positioning itself as a replacement so much as a recalibration, one that pulls closer to Stephen King’s novel while filtering the story through modern horror sensibilities.

Rank #3

Christine by Stephen King (2011-10-13)

$24.99

Buy on Amazon

Rather than attempting to outdo Carpenter’s iconic set pieces, the new version appears focused on emotional realism, psychological corrosion, and contemporary relevance. That shift alone signals a markedly different experience, even if the bones of the story remain familiar.

A Darker, More Novel-Accurate Character Arc

One of the clearest departures will be Arnie’s transformation itself. Carpenter’s film compressed Arnie’s descent, presenting it as abrupt and visually striking, but comparatively streamlined. The remake is expected to lean into the novel’s slower, more insidious progression, emphasizing how Christine amplifies traits Arnie already possesses rather than simply possessing him outright.

This approach reframes the horror as cumulative rather than explosive. Arnie’s loss of empathy, his emotional withdrawal, and his growing cruelty toward those closest to him are likely to unfold in uncomfortable stages, grounding the supernatural elements in recognizable psychological behavior.

Christine as a Manipulator, Not Just a Monster

In the 1983 film, Christine is often treated as an externalized villain, a murderous force acting upon Arnie. The remake is widely expected to blur that line, portraying the car less as a possessed object and more as a psychological enabler that feeds on insecurity, resentment, and entitlement.

This subtle shift aligns more closely with King’s thematic intent. Christine doesn’t simply kill; she validates Arnie’s worst impulses, whispering that the world owes him something. Modern horror audiences, attuned to stories about toxic relationships and radicalization, may find this interpretation especially unsettling.

A Contemporary Lens on Masculinity and Obsession

Another key difference will likely emerge in how the story frames masculinity. Carpenter’s film, intentionally or not, reflected early-1980s attitudes toward male insecurity and power. The remake has an opportunity to interrogate those ideas more directly, positioning Arnie’s obsession with Christine as a response to perceived social failure and alienation.

Rather than glorifying his transformation, the new film may treat it as a cautionary spiral. This reframing doesn’t soften the story, but it does sharpen its relevance, turning Christine into a metaphor for how validation-seeking can curdle into control and violence.

Modern Horror Craft Over Nostalgic Style

Visually and tonally, the remake is expected to move away from Carpenter’s clean, widescreen compositions and synth-driven minimalism. While the original’s style is iconic, the new film will likely embrace contemporary horror techniques: harsher lighting, more intimate camera work, and sound design that places the audience inside Arnie’s deteriorating headspace.

Practical effects are still expected to play a major role, particularly in Christine’s self-repair sequences, but they will likely be augmented rather than showcased. The goal appears to be immersion rather than spectacle, making the violence and destruction feel invasive instead of operatic.

Respecting the Original Without Repeating It

Importantly, everything known so far suggests the remake is not interested in recreating Carpenter’s greatest hits beat for beat. Iconic moments will almost certainly be reinterpreted or recontextualized, allowing longtime fans to recognize the story without predicting it.

That balance, honoring what made Christine endure while refusing to be bound by it, is where the remake’s real challenge lies. If successful, it could stand alongside Carpenter’s film not as a competitor, but as a darker, more psychologically tuned companion piece for a new generation of horror fans.

Themes and Modern Updates: Obsession, Toxic Masculinity, and Technology’s Dark Side

Obsession Reframed for an Always-Online Age

In the remake, Arnie’s fixation on Christine is expected to feel less like an isolated teenage spiral and more like a feedback loop fueled by modern validation culture. Obsession no longer grows in a vacuum; it’s reinforced by online communities, performative identity, and the quiet pressure to be seen as exceptional. Christine becomes not just an object of desire, but a curated extension of self, something that promises status, control, and belonging.

This shift subtly updates King’s original idea without betraying it. Where the novel and Carpenter’s film portrayed obsession as inward and corrosive, the remake can show how it is shaped and accelerated by external reinforcement. Arnie doesn’t just lose himself to Christine; he is encouraged to.

Toxic Masculinity as a Horror Engine

The remake appears poised to confront toxic masculinity more directly, framing Arnie’s transformation as a reaction to humiliation, invisibility, and wounded pride. Rather than a power fantasy, Christine becomes a tool through which Arnie reasserts dominance after repeated social failure. His bond with the car mirrors real-world patterns where control replaces connection, and aggression substitutes for vulnerability.

Importantly, this approach doesn’t flatten Arnie into a villain from the start. By grounding his arc in recognizable emotional pain, the film can explore how toxic masculinity is learned, reinforced, and ultimately weaponized. Christine doesn’t create the monster; she gives it permission.

Rank #4

Christine

$24.48

Buy on Amazon

Technology’s Dark Side: Control, Surveillance, and Dependence

While Christine remains a 1958 Plymouth Fury, the remake is expected to draw sharper parallels to modern technology and our uneasy dependence on it. Cars today are rolling data centers, filled with GPS tracking, automated systems, and interfaces that blur the line between machine and companion. Leaning into that reality allows Christine to feel uncannily contemporary without turning her into a literal smart car.

The horror emerges from the illusion of control. As Arnie believes he’s mastering Christine, the film can quietly suggest the opposite, echoing anxieties about how technology shapes behavior while masquerading as empowerment. Christine doesn’t just obey; she anticipates, corrects, and ultimately dominates.

Updating the Metaphor Without Breaking the Myth

What makes these thematic updates promising is their restraint. Rather than overexplaining or modernizing for novelty’s sake, the remake seems intent on sharpening Christine’s core metaphor: obsession as possession, and possession as erasure. The story still hinges on a boy and a car, but the implications are broader, darker, and more culturally attuned.

By filtering King’s themes through contemporary fears, the remake has the chance to make Christine feel newly dangerous. Not because she’s faster or deadlier, but because she reflects the systems and impulses audiences already recognize in their own lives.

Production Status and Timeline: Development Updates, Studio Involvement, and Release Window

While Christine’s thematic direction is starting to come into focus, the film remains firmly in the development phase. The project was first announced in 2021, and like many high-profile Stephen King adaptations, it has taken a deliberately slow path toward production. That caution reflects both the weight of the source material and the industry’s increasing emphasis on getting prestige horror remakes right rather than rushing them into theaters.

Blumhouse and the Studio Backing the Remake

The remake is being developed under the Blumhouse banner, a studio with a proven track record of revitalizing legacy horror properties while keeping budgets controlled and creative voices front and center. Sony Pictures, which distributed John Carpenter’s 1983 original, is also involved, suggesting continuity in stewardship even as the approach evolves. This partnership signals a theatrical-first mindset rather than a streaming-exclusive release, aligning Christine with Blumhouse’s more event-oriented horror titles.

Blumhouse’s involvement is particularly significant given its recent success adapting Stephen King works and King-adjacent material with a grounded, character-driven sensibility. That philosophy dovetails cleanly with the remake’s apparent interest in psychology and social commentary over spectacle-heavy reinvention.

Creative Development and Behind-the-Scenes Movement

Development has included multiple script passes, with an emphasis on modernizing the story’s themes without altering its core premise. While early reports attached specific creative names to the project, the remake has since gone quiet on firm director or writer confirmations, suggesting behind-the-scenes recalibration rather than abandonment. In the current remake landscape, that kind of pause often indicates a studio ensuring tonal alignment before locking a creative team in place.

Importantly, there have been no reports of the project being shelved. Industry coverage continues to frame Christine as active development rather than stalled, a distinction that matters in an era where many announced remakes quietly disappear.

Filming Timeline and Expected Release Window

As of now, Christine has not entered principal photography, and no production start date has been officially announced. Given typical Blumhouse development timelines and the absence of casting announcements, filming is unlikely to begin before late 2026 at the earliest. That places a realistic theatrical release window in 2027, depending on scheduling, post-production demands, and studio calendar strategy.

For fans tracking King adaptations, this slower rollout may be a positive sign. Rather than chasing nostalgia-driven urgency, the remake appears to be positioning itself as a considered reintroduction—one designed to resonate with modern audiences while honoring the dangerous simplicity that made Christine endure.

What We Still Don’t Know: Major Open Questions and Speculation

Even with Blumhouse attached and development ongoing, key creative and structural details about the Christine remake remain deliberately under wraps. That silence leaves plenty of room for informed speculation, particularly about how far the film will push its modernization without diluting what made Stephen King’s story so unsettling in the first place.

How Faithful Will the Story Be to King’s Novel?

One of the biggest unanswered questions is whether the remake will hew closer to King’s 1983 novel or John Carpenter’s streamlined film adaptation. The book leans harder into obsession, toxic masculinity, and the slow corrosion of identity, while the original movie favored mood and inevitability over internal psychology.

Given Blumhouse’s recent track record, many expect a version that restores some of the novel’s darker, more intimate character work. Whether that includes the book’s more brutal arcs or its shifting narrative perspective remains to be seen.

Is Christine Still a 1958 Plymouth Fury?

The car itself is another open question with major thematic implications. The iconic red-and-white 1958 Plymouth Fury is inseparable from Christine’s identity, but sourcing and maintaining multiple versions of that vehicle is costly and logistically complex.

There has been no confirmation that the remake will retain the same model, leading to speculation about a modern equivalent or a recontextualized classic. A period-accurate Fury would lean into nostalgia and myth, while a contemporary vehicle could sharpen the story’s commentary on consumer obsession and identity in the digital age.

Best Value

Christine by King, Stephen (1991) Hardcover

$45.48

Buy on Amazon

Who Will Play Arnie and Leigh?

Casting remains completely unannounced, and that silence may be strategic. Arnie Cunningham’s transformation from marginalized teen to possessed tyrant requires a nuanced performance that can sell both vulnerability and menace, a balance not every young actor can manage.

Leigh, often underwritten in past adaptations, could emerge as a stronger emotional anchor this time around. If the remake leans into modern character dynamics, her role may expand beyond romantic concern into something more psychologically grounded and confrontational.

What Tone Will the Remake Ultimately Strike?

Christine can play as supernatural horror, psychological thriller, or social allegory, and the tonal balance will define how this version is received. Carpenter’s film leaned heavily on atmosphere and inevitability, while King’s novel is angrier and more tragic.

The lack of a confirmed director makes this especially difficult to predict. Whether the remake opts for slow-burn dread, heightened genre energy, or character-driven horror will likely hinge on who ultimately takes the helm.

How Directly Will It Engage With Modern Themes?

There has been talk of updating the story’s themes, but no clarity on what that actually means on screen. Arnie’s isolation, entitlement, and eventual domination of others could easily be reframed through contemporary lenses like online radicalization, identity performance, or consumer-driven self-worth.

The challenge will be integrating those ideas without turning Christine into a heavy-handed allegory. King’s best adaptations tend to let metaphor emerge naturally from character, not commentary.

Will Stephen King or John Carpenter Be Involved?

As of now, neither Stephen King nor John Carpenter has been publicly attached beyond King’s standard rights-holder role. King has been selectively vocal about adaptations in recent years, and his endorsement could significantly shape fan perception.

Carpenter’s direct involvement seems unlikely, but even a musical homage or thematic nod to his original score would carry weight. Whether the remake acknowledges its cinematic predecessor directly or treats itself as a fresh adaptation of the novel remains an open, closely watched question.

Until more concrete announcements arrive, Christine exists in a liminal space between legacy and reinvention. For fans of King and horror remakes alike, that uncertainty is part of the anticipation—and a reminder that the most dangerous thing about Christine has always been how quietly it waits before revealing its true nature.

Why Christine Still Matters: Expectations, Risks, and the Remake’s Place in King’s Adaptation Renaissance

Stephen King adaptations are once again a dominant force in horror, and Christine arrives at a moment when expectations are unusually high. Recent films and series have shown a renewed respect for King’s character-driven storytelling, favoring emotional fidelity over surface-level scares. That puts this remake under a sharper microscope than most, especially given the near-mythic status of John Carpenter’s 1983 film.

Christine as a Litmus Test for Modern King Remakes

Christine is not just another recognizable title in King’s catalog; it is a tonal balancing act that tests how well modern filmmakers understand his darker themes. At its core, the story is about obsession, insecurity, and the seduction of power, wrapped in supernatural horror. Any remake that leans too hard into spectacle risks losing the intimate tragedy that makes Arnie Cunningham’s descent unsettling rather than cartoonish.

This is where recent successes like It and Doctor Sleep loom large. Those adaptations proved that King’s work resonates most when it treats horror as an extension of character, not a replacement for it. Christine will need that same discipline to justify its existence beyond brand recognition.

The Risks of Revisiting a Cult Classic

Remaking Christine carries a unique burden because Carpenter’s film is not just well-liked; it is foundational to automotive horror and synth-driven dread. The danger lies in repeating iconic imagery without reinterpreting its meaning for a new generation. A shot-for-shot homage would feel redundant, while a radical overhaul could alienate fans who view the original as untouchable.

There is also the challenge of scale. Christine is a relatively intimate story compared to King’s more sprawling epics, and inflation into blockbuster territory would undermine its claustrophobic power. The smartest path forward likely lies in restraint, letting atmosphere and psychology do the heavy lifting rather than excess mythology.

Where the Remake Fits in King’s Ongoing Renaissance

The current wave of Stephen King adaptations has been defined by range, from prestige miniseries to muscular studio horror. Christine sits at an interesting crossroads between those approaches, small enough to be character-focused but iconic enough to demand cinematic presence. Its success or failure may signal how Hollywood handles King’s mid-tier novels going forward, not just the obvious crowd-pleasers.

As of now, the remake remains in early development, with no confirmed cast, director, or production start date publicly announced. That lack of concrete detail has fueled speculation, but it also suggests a degree of caution, perhaps an awareness of the property’s legacy and the risks involved. In an era where rushed remakes often stumble, patience could be Christine’s greatest advantage.

A Story That Refuses to Stay in the Past

Christine endures because its central horror is not tied to a specific decade or technology. The idea of an object that feeds on insecurity and rewards cruelty feels as relevant now as it did in the late 1970s. Whether framed through classic Americana or updated cultural anxieties, the story’s emotional engine remains potent.

If the remake can capture that universality while carving out its own identity, it has the potential to stand alongside the best modern King adaptations rather than beneath their shadows. Until more is revealed, Christine remains both a question mark and a promise, waiting quietly in the garage, daring filmmakers to turn the key and prove it still has something dangerous to say.

Quick Recap

SaleBestseller No. 1

Christine

$18.99

SaleBestseller No. 2

Classic King Boxed Set 1: Christine, Cujo, Pet Sematary

$34.50

Bestseller No. 3

Christine by Stephen King (2011-10-13)

$24.99

Bestseller No. 4

Christine

$24.48

Bestseller No. 5

Christine by King, Stephen (1991) Hardcover

$45.48

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.