No authenticated photograph of Joseph Smith has been established. A 2012 Church magazine article said no authenticated photograph was known. In May 2026, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced that it had accepted a locket containing a daguerreotype reported to date from the 1840s, but said it still could not conclude who is pictured. The responsible description is therefore “purported” or “disputed,” not a verified photograph of Smith.
What the evidence establishes
Identification starts with the status of the object, not with whether a face looks familiar. The historical record currently supports three separate statements:
- A 2012 article in a Church magazine stated that no authenticated photograph of Joseph Smith was known at that time.
- In May 2026, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said it had accepted, by donation, a locket containing a daguerreotype reported to be from the 1840s. The locket was discovered in 2020.
- The Church said it could not draw a conclusion about who is pictured in that daguerreotype. Its newsroom statement says: “Some believe it may be an image of Joseph Smith. As we have acknowledged, since the discovery of the locket in 2020, we cannot draw a conclusion about who is pictured in the daguerreotype.”
Those statements do not prove that Smith was never photographed. They mean that an image has not been authenticated to the standard needed for a firm identification. Until an institution documents the sitter with persuasive object-level evidence and provenance, label a claimed image as disputed.
First identify what you are looking at
Many images circulated as “photographs of Joseph Smith” are photographs of later likenesses. Before comparing facial features, classify the object.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →#1 Best Overall
- HD streaming made simple: With America’s number 1 TV streaming platform,* exploring popular apps—plus tons of free movies, shows, and live TV—is as easy as it is fun. *Based on hours streamed—Hypothesis Group
- Compact without compromises: The sleek design of Roku Streaming Stick won’t block neighboring HDMI ports, and it even powers from your TV alone, plugging into the back and staying out of sight. No wall outlet, no extra cords, no clutter.
- No more juggling remotes: Power up your TV, adjust the volume, and control your Roku device with one remote. Use your voice to quickly search, play entertainment, and more.
- Shows on the go: Take your TV to-go when traveling—without needing to log into someone else’s device.
- TV, simplified: With setup that only takes minutes, a simple-to-navigate Home Screen, and an uncluttered remote control that does all you need—Roku makes it easier to watch the TV you love.
| Object type | What the record may show | How to describe it |
|---|---|---|
| Original photograph | A photographic object made during the subject’s lifetime, with a documented chain of custody and attribution | Potential direct photographic evidence, pending authentication |
| Daguerreotype in a locket | The 2026 Church statement describes a locket containing a daguerreotype reported to be from the 1840s | Reported 1840s daguerreotype; sitter’s identity unresolved |
| Photographic reproduction of a daguerreotype | The National Portrait Gallery record uses the wording “Photographic reproduction of daguerreotype” and lists the Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division as owner | A reproduction record, not independent authentication of the person in the underlying daguerreotype |
| Photograph of a rendering or sculpture | The Joseph Smith likeness collection includes photographs of renderings and sculptures | A photograph of a likeness, not a photograph made from Smith’s life |
| Engraving or other artwork | The likeness collection also includes engravings | A later artistic representation |
| Death mask or photograph of a death mask | The likeness collection includes the death mask and images of it; the 2012 article explains that death masks were made after Joseph and Hyrum Smith died | Postmortem physical likeness or an image of it, not a lifetime photograph |
| Grave-site photograph | The likeness collection includes photographs of the grave site | Documentation of a place, not a portrait |
A catalog title, caption or file name can conceal these distinctions. Read the institution’s object-type field and description rather than relying on a social-media caption.
Read the catalog record before the face
Check the institution and collection
An institutional record identifies who holds the object, how it entered the collection and how curators describe it. Record the repository, collection name, item title, object type, date or date range, attribution wording and any stated restrictions. “Joseph Smith” in a collection title can indicate subject matter rather than proof that every image in the collection shows him.
Separate a date from an identification
A date assigned to an object answers when it was made, or when an institution believes it was made. It does not answer who sat for it. The Church’s 2026 statement illustrates the point: the locket daguerreotype is reported to be from the 1840s, yet the Church says it cannot identify the sitter. Treat “1840s” as a dating claim until the attribution is separately supported.
Pay attention to uncertainty words
Catalogs use different levels of commitment. “Identified as” or “attributed to” records an institutional judgment; “possibly,” “reported to be” and “purported” signal an unresolved claim. Do not turn a cautious catalog description into a definite caption when you quote or share the image.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Build a provenance chain
Provenance is the documented history of an object’s ownership and custody. It cannot by itself prove a sitter’s identity, but gaps and unsupported jumps make a claim weaker.
- Capture the current record. Save the repository, collection, item identifier, object type, date basis and exact attribution language.
- Ask where the object came from. Note the donor, previous owner, estate, dealer or family tradition named by the institution. Distinguish a documented transfer from an undocumented story.
- List every custody transition. Put owners and dates in chronological order. Mark periods for which no record is supplied instead of silently filling the gap.
- Separate object history from caption history. A label may have changed while the physical object remained the same. Record when the Joseph Smith attribution first appears, if the catalog says.
- Check whether the image is a copy. A modern print, scan or photographic reproduction can preserve an earlier image while adding no new evidence about the sitter.
- Write the conclusion at the same confidence level as the record. If the repository itself is undecided, your caption should remain undecided.
For the 2026 locket, the public statement establishes the donation and the reported 1840s date, but also expressly leaves the sitter unidentified. That unresolved status must remain part of any description.
Rank #2
- Ultra-speedy streaming: Roku Ultra is 30% faster than any other Roku player, delivering a lightning-fast interface and apps that launch in a snap.
- Cinematic streaming: This TV streaming device brings the movie theater to your living room with spectacular 4K, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision picture alongside immersive Dolby Atmos audio.
- The ultimate Roku remote: The rechargeable Roku Voice Remote Pro offers backlit buttons, hands-free voice controls, and a lost remote finder.
- No more fumbling in the dark: See what you’re pressing with backlit buttons.
- Say goodbye to batteries: Keep your remote powered for months on a single charge.
Use the Joseph Smith likeness collections correctly
The Church History Library’s Photograph Collections Research Guide describes several collections that help researchers sort image types and dates:
- Daguerreotype collection: materials described as dating from circa the 1850s–1860s.
- Savage and Ottinger studio portraits: portraits described as circa 1862–1872.
- Joseph Smith likeness collection: material described as circa 1840–1980, including engravings and photographs of renderings and sculptures, along with the death mask and grave site.
These date ranges describe the collections or groups, not proof that Joseph Smith sat for each image. The guide directs readers to individual catalog research and notes that access to a collection may be available upon request. Start with the individual item record, then ask the Library about an item whose description is unclear.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsHow to compare images without overclaiming
Use likenesses as context, not as a control image
The 2012 Church magazine article explains that death masks were made after Joseph and Hyrum Smith’s deaths and that later artists based works on those masks. A mask or portrait can show how later generations represented Smith, but it is not an independently authenticated lifetime photograph. Facial resemblance can support a historical discussion; it cannot substitute for provenance, object analysis and catalog evidence.
Check whether the comparison image is itself later
The Joseph and Emma portraits are attributed to David Rogers. The Church History Library says Rogers visited the Smith home in September 1842 and spent several days working on a portrait of Joseph, while the specific details of the portraits’ creation remain unknown. That attribution makes the portraits important historical representations, but the uncertainty about their creation means they should not be treated as photographic proof.
Compare observable features only after classification
If you make a visual comparison, document what you can actually observe: head angle, lighting, clothing, hair arrangement, image orientation and visible facial structure. Do not infer identity from a single resemblance, a familiar hairstyle or a caption copied from another website. Also remember that a reproduction can alter contrast, crop the frame or reverse the image, making side-by-side judgments unreliable.
Known Joseph Smith-related images and the right labels
The disputed locket daguerreotype
The Church’s May 2026 newsroom statement concerns a locket containing a daguerreotype reported to be from the 1840s and discovered in 2020. Some people believe the sitter may be Joseph Smith. The Church, however, says it cannot conclude who is pictured. A careful caption is: “Daguerreotype in a locket, reported to date from the 1840s; proposed identification as Joseph Smith remains unresolved.”
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Rank #3
- 4K streaming made simple:With America’s number 1 TV streaming platform,* exploring popular apps—plus tons of free movies, shows, and live TV—is as easy as it is fun. *Based on hours streamed—Hypothesis Group
- 4K picture quality: With Roku Streaming Stick Plus, watch your favorites with brilliant 4K picture and vivid HDR color.
- Compact without compromises: Our sleek design won’t block neighboring HDMI ports, and it even powers from your TV alone, plugging into the back and staying out of sight. No wall outlet, no extra cords, no clutter.
- No more juggling remotes: Power up your TV, adjust the volume, and control your Roku device with one remote. Use your voice to quickly search, play entertainment, and more.
- Shows on the go: Take your TV to-go when traveling—without needing to log into someone else’s device.
The National Portrait Gallery reproduction
The National Portrait Gallery catalog describes one item as a “Photographic reproduction of daguerreotype” and identifies the Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division as owner. That wording tells you what the cataloged object is: a reproduction associated with a daguerreotype. It does not, by itself, authenticate the sitter in the underlying daguerreotype. Cite the record as evidence about the reproduction and ownership, not as a final verdict on Joseph Smith’s identity.
The Joseph and Emma portraits
The Church History Library attributes the Joseph and Emma portraits to David Rogers, who visited the Smith home in September 1842 and spent several days working on Joseph’s portrait. The Library also says the detailed creation history is unknown. Describe these works as portraits attributed to Rogers, preserving the attribution and its limitation.
Engravings, sculptures and death-mask images
The Joseph Smith likeness collection contains engravings and photographs of renderings and sculptures, as well as the death mask and grave site. A cataloged image from that group may therefore show a representation rather than Smith himself. The object description—not visual familiarity—determines which category applies.
A practical evidence framework
When several images are presented as Joseph Smith, score each claim qualitatively across the same five questions:
| Evidence axis | Question to ask | What a cautious finding looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Object identity | Is it an original photograph, a copy, a photograph of artwork, an engraving or a mask? | State the physical or cataloged object type first. |
| Provenance | Is there a documented chain of custody from creation to the current repository? | Describe documented transfers and identify gaps. |
| Date | How was the date assigned, and does it refer to the object, the copy or the underlying work? | Keep the date attached to its basis and object. |
| Institutional attribution | Does the repository say “identified,” “attributed,” “reported,” “possibly” or something similar? | Use the institution’s level of certainty verbatim or in equivalent plain language. |
| Comparison material | Is the proposed reference image itself a later portrait, mask, engraving or reproduction? | Use it as historical context, not independent authentication. |
If the object is a reproduction, provenance is incomplete and the comparison image is a later likeness, the proper result is a qualified description rather than an identification. No numerical confidence score is established by the official sources discussed here, so do not assign a percentage based on facial resemblance.
A step-by-step workflow for identifying a photograph
- Preserve the original context. Record where you found the image, its caption, surrounding text and any collection or item number.
- Inspect the object description. Determine whether the record calls it a photograph, daguerreotype, reproduction, engraving, sculpture photograph, death mask or another format.
- Locate the repository record. Prefer a museum, library or archive catalog over an uncited repost. Read the full description, not only the thumbnail title.
- Extract the date and its basis. Write “reported 1840s,” “circa 1850s–1860s” or another qualified form only when the record uses that dating.
- Trace provenance. Note owners, donors and custody transitions, and mark undocumented intervals.
- Check attribution language. Preserve distinctions among an institutional identification, an attribution to an artist, a report from a donor and an unresolved proposal.
- Compare with likenesses only as a secondary step. Use portraits, engravings and masks to understand representation history, not to create authentication by resemblance.
- Consult the collection specialist. Send the repository the item identifier and your specific question. Ask whether the image is an original, a reproduction or a photograph of a likeness, and what evidence supports the caption.
- Publish a precise caption. Name the object, date basis, repository and uncertainty in one sentence. Do not shorten a disputed attribution into “Joseph Smith, photograph.”
Common misidentifications and how to correct them
“It is dated to the 1840s, so it must be Smith.”
Dating and identity are separate questions. The locket statement demonstrates that an object can be reported as 1840s while the sitter remains unknown. Correct the caption by keeping both claims separate.
Rank #4
- Stunning 4K and Dolby Vision streaming made simple: With America’s number 1 TV streaming platform,* exploring popular apps—plus tons of free movies, shows, and live TV—is as easy as it is fun. *Based on hours streamed—Hypothesis Group
- Breathtaking picture quality: Stunningly sharp 4K picture brings out rich detail in your entertainment with four times the resolution of HD. Watch as colors pop off your screen and enjoy lifelike clarity with Dolby Vision and HDR10+.
- Seamless streaming for any room: With Roku Streaming Stick 4K, watch your favorite entertainment on any TV in the house, even in rooms farther from your router thanks to the long-range Wi-Fi receiver.
- Shows on the go: Take your TV to-go when traveling—without needing to log into someone else’s device.
- Compact without compromises: Our sleek design won’t block neighboring HDMI ports, so you can switch from streaming to gaming with ease. Plus, it’s designed to stay hidden behind your TV, keeping wires neatly out of sight
“The image appears in a Joseph Smith collection, so it shows him.”
A likeness collection can include engravings, photographs of renderings and sculptures, a death mask and a grave-site image. Correct the mistake by reading the item-level object type.
“A reproduction proves the original.”
The National Portrait Gallery’s wording identifies a photographic reproduction of a daguerreotype. A reproduction establishes that an image was copied; it does not independently authenticate the person represented in the source object.
“The face matches a famous portrait.”
Later portraits and masks are representations with their own histories. The Church History Library’s account of the David Rogers portraits preserves an attribution while acknowledging that detailed creation information is unknown. Use resemblance as context only.
“A confident caption is harmless.”
Once a disputed image is reposted without its qualification, later viewers may treat the claim as settled. Keep “purported,” “reported,” “attributed” or “unresolved” in every caption and catalog note where the evidence requires it.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What did Joseph Smith really look like?
The available institutional material does not provide a verified photographic baseline against which every later image can be measured. What exists is a mixture of representations: portraits attributed to David Rogers, engravings, photographs of renderings and sculptures, death-mask material and photographs documenting the grave site. These sources are valuable for studying how Smith was portrayed, but they are not interchangeable with an authenticated photograph made during his life.
The most accurate answer is therefore limited: historians can study documented likenesses and disputed photographic objects, but they cannot point to a photograph whose sitter has been conclusively authenticated as Joseph Smith on the evidence described above.
Recommended Free Tools
Best Value
- The Google TV Streamer (4K) delivers your favorite entertainment quickly, easily, and personalized to you[1,2]
- HDMI 2.1 cable required (sold separately)
- See movies and TV shows from all your services right from your home screen[2]; and find new things to watch with tailored recommendations for everyone in your home based on their interests and viewing habits
- Watch live TV and access over 800 free channels from Pluto TV, Tubi, and more[3]; if you find an interesting show or movie on your TV, mobile app, or Google search, you can easily add it to your watchlist, so it’s ready when you are[2]
- Up to 4K HDR with Dolby Vision delivers captivating, true-to-life detail[4]; and you can connect speakers that support Dolby Atmos for more immersive 3D sound
How to write a responsible caption or catalog note
Use a format that keeps the evidence attached to the claim:
- Object: name the format, such as daguerreotype, reproduction or portrait.
- Date: include the repository’s qualifier, such as “reported to date from the 1840s” or a stated circa range.
- Attribution: identify the institution’s wording, such as “attributed to David Rogers.”
- Repository: name the holding institution and collection or item record.
- Limitation: say when the sitter or creation history remains unresolved.
For the locket, a responsible short form is: “Daguerreotype in a locket, reported to date from the 1840s; some have proposed Joseph Smith as the sitter, but The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints says it cannot draw a conclusion about who is pictured.”
Where to continue the investigation
Use the Church History Library’s Photograph Collections Research Guide to orient your search among the daguerreotype collection, the Savage and Ottinger studio portraits and the Joseph Smith likeness collection. Then open the individual item record and ask the Library about access when a collection is available upon request. For an image described by the National Portrait Gallery, read the complete catalog entry and its ownership note rather than relying on a cropped reproduction or an unsourced caption.
Keep copies of catalog wording and dates with your own notes. If a repository updates an attribution, you can then show which part of your description changed and which part remains documented.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Bottom line
Identify the object before identifying the face. Establish whether you have an original photograph or a later representation, document provenance, keep the date tied to its evidence, preserve the repository’s uncertainty language and treat portraits or death masks as contextual likenesses. On the evidence currently made public, the locket daguerreotype is a disputed proposal—not an authenticated photograph of Joseph Smith.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Say something about this film