The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →No surviving photograph has been established as a verified image of Joseph Smith. The most defensible visual evidence instead comes from portraits made while he was alive and a plaster death mask made after his death. A profile drawn from life in 1842, an oil portrait associated with sittings recorded that same year, and the 1844 death mask each preserve different kinds of information. None provides a scientifically measured percentage of resemblance, and none makes every later reproduction automatically reliable.
The often-circulated daguerreotype is not authenticated as Smith. In 2008, the Church Public Affairs office said the available evidence could not confirm that identification. A specialist analysis has argued that the image was copied from an oil painting rather than made from Smith alive, while other claimed images remain unresolved. The right question is therefore not which picture looks most familiar, but which object has the strongest chain of evidence connecting it to Smith and to direct observation.
What can be established about Joseph Smith’s appearance?
Joseph Smith died in June 1844, before photography became a routine way to preserve a person’s likeness. Photographer Lucian Rose Foster opened a studio in Nauvoo in 1844, but no photograph of Smith has survived with a verifiable identity. The Joseph Smith Papers explains that if Foster photographed Smith, the image is now lost. That possibility is historically plausible, but it is not evidence that a particular surviving plate or print shows Smith.
Several objects do have a documented connection to Smith. Their evidentiary value is not identical:
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstall#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
| Object | Date and maker | What it can support | Important limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maudsley profile | Life sitting on 25 June 1842; Sutcliffe Maudsley | A contemporaneous profile observed while Smith was alive | The original drawing used for later formal work has not been identified; surviving versions may be copies |
| Rogers-attributed oil portrait | Sittings recorded in September 1842; attributed to David Rogers | A portrait linked to Smith’s household and to a documented period of sittings | Scholars disagree about which surviving painting corresponds to the journal entry and how secure the attribution is |
| Death mask | 1844; George Cannon and Ariah C. Brower | Three-dimensional physical features recorded after death | It is postmortem, not a portrait Smith sat for, and cannot by itself prove that a painting or photograph is accurate |
| Claimed daguerreotype | Exact photographer and date uncertain | A photographic object whose identity and source can be investigated | Institutional confirmation is absent; one specialist argues it copied a painting |
These categories explain why historians can discuss a historically grounded likeness without claiming that one image is an authenticated photographic portrait.
The Maudsley profile: the clearest evidence of direct observation
What happened on 25 June 1842?
Smith’s journal records that he sat for a profile drawing on 25 June 1842. The Church History Museum identifies Sutcliffe Maudsley as the artist and describes the drawing as made from life. Maudsley later likely copied the profile to create a more formal image for a Nauvoo map. The Joseph Smith Papers lists a Maudsley profile in gouache and ink from about 1842 among the important contemporary images of Smith.
A sitting from life matters because the artist could observe Smith’s head shape, nose, mouth, chin, hairline and posture directly. It is stronger evidence for those features than a portrait created decades later from memory or from another reproduction. It still is not a camera record: a profile drawing reflects the artist’s materials, technique, choices about proportion and any later copying.
Why the missing original matters
The museum says the original drawing used for the later formal work has not been identified. That leaves a chain of uncertainty. We know a life sitting occurred, but we cannot automatically treat every image labeled “Maudsley profile” as the untouched sheet produced that day. A copy can preserve much of an original likeness while introducing changes in line, scale or emphasis.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteThe responsible claim is therefore specific: the Maudsley tradition rests on a documented life observation in 1842, but the exact surviving object closest to that first drawing is not established. It is valuable contemporary evidence, not a guaranteed photographic equivalent.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
The David Rogers-attributed oil portrait
What the journal records
In September 1842, Smith’s journal records sittings with “brother [David] Rogers.” A scholarly account published by the Religious Studies Center connects those sittings with the familiar front-view oil portrait attributed to David Rogers. The Community of Christ also attributes that work to Rogers. This is why the painting is often treated as one of the principal contemporary likenesses.
Provenance and attribution are different questions
The painting has a reported family history: it hung in the Smith home, and Emma Smith later kept it at the Nauvoo House. A documented ownership path can strengthen confidence that a work was associated with Smith’s family rather than being a later invention. It does not, however, prove every detail about when or by whom the painting was made.
The same scholarly account notes disagreement over whether the front-view portrait or a profile painting is the work mentioned in the journal. “Attributed to David Rogers” is therefore the careful wording. It recognizes the historical association without presenting the artist, the exact sitting and the identity of a particular canvas as settled beyond debate.
What the painting can and cannot tell you
An oil portrait can preserve facial relationships that are difficult to capture in a quick drawing, and a front view offers features absent from a profile. But paint is interpretive. The artist may regularize asymmetry, improve the sitter’s appearance, alter lighting or work from memory between sittings. The painting is strongest when considered alongside the journal entry, family provenance and other contemporary images, not as an isolated standard against which every photograph must be forced to match.
The death mask: physical evidence, but made after death
George Cannon and Ariah C. Brower made a plaster death mask in 1844, now held by the Church History Museum. A mask records the surface of a face in three dimensions after death. It can preserve contours around the nose, cheekbones, jaw and forehead that artists may have simplified. For comparison, it is often more physically informative than a stylized portrait.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Its timing creates a strict boundary. Smith did not sit for the mask, and it is postmortem rather than a living likeness. Changes caused by death, handling, casting and later restoration can affect the result. The mask can corroborate or challenge features in a portrait, but it cannot alone identify an artist’s canvas or authenticate a photograph.
When comparing the mask with a candidate image, ask whether the same structural features recur across independent objects. A resemblance can raise confidence; it cannot substitute for provenance showing who made the image, when and from what source.
Why the famous daguerreotype is not authenticated
The 2008 institutional statement
A daguerreotype associated with the Community of Christ became the subject of public claims that it showed Smith. In March 2008, the Church Public Affairs office said: “On the basis of available evidence it is not possible to confirm that the image is, in fact, of Joseph Smith.” Church News reported that statement and noted that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints did not own the photograph, although it held Smith’s death mask and early artists’ portrayals and photographs of those portrayals.
That statement has a defined scope and date. It reports what could be confirmed from the evidence available in 2008; it is not a ruling on every image publicized later. It does establish that the daguerreotype was not institutionally verified at that time.
The argument that the camera photographed a painting
A specialist book excerpt compares the daguerreotype with the Rogers-attributed oil painting and the death mask. The author argues that the daguerreotype reproduces the painting and shares discrepancies with the death mask, concluding that the camera recorded the painting rather than Smith alive. If correct, that would explain why the photograph can look convincing while lacking the evidentiary value of a direct sitting.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
This is an attributed specialist analysis, not an interchangeable replacement for the 2008 institutional statement. It is also not proof that every claimed photograph of Smith was made from a painting. Each object requires its own examination of plate, provenance, inscriptions, dimensions, image direction and comparison with known works.
Recommended Free Tools
The Carter glass-plate interpretation
The same excerpt describes an earlier researcher’s interpretation of a separate Carter glass-plate negative as a copy of a lost daguerreotype taken from life. That proposal concerns a different object and should not be presented as confirmation of the disputed daguerreotype. It illustrates how multiple layers of copying can enter the history of a likeness: a living sitter, a daguerreotype, a glass-plate negative and later reproductions may all be connected, or they may not.
What about a later locket claim?
A later claim involving a locket daguerreotype remains unresolved. No stronger conclusion should be drawn without a directly relevant, current examination of that specific object. Treating an unresolved claim as authenticated would go beyond the evidence.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why familiar modern images can be misleading
The image most people recognize may be familiar because it has been reproduced in books, church materials, documentaries and online galleries—not because it is the most directly observed or securely attributed. The Joseph Smith Papers says that the profile most frequently associated with its project is Danquart A. Weggeland’s work, which was based on earlier artists’ images. The project uses it for design purposes and explicitly states: “Our use of this image is not intended as an endorsement of it as the definitive image of Joseph Smith.”
The project also says, “In the absence of a verifiable photograph, we have used several other images of Joseph Smith as well.” Its editors prefer images whose content, date and provenance can be verified, and they may correct or remove an image when later research shows it was used incorrectly. This policy is a useful model for viewers: popularity is not the same as authentication.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
How to judge a Joseph Smith likeness
Use the following sequence when evaluating an image in a book, exhibit or online post.
- Identify the object and medium. Determine whether you are looking at a drawing, an oil painting, a death mask, an original photographic plate or a photograph of another artwork. A photograph of a painting is not a photograph of the person.
- Check contemporaneity. Ask whether it was made while Smith was alive. The Maudsley sitting on 25 June 1842 and the Rogers sittings recorded in September 1842 meet this basic test; a later copy does not.
- Look for direct observation. Give more weight to an artist who recorded a sitting from life than to an image based on an unnamed earlier reproduction. Direct observation still does not eliminate artistic interpretation.
- Trace provenance. Find out who owned the object, when it entered a collection and whether its history connects it to Smith or his family. The reported Smith-family history of the Rogers-attributed portrait is relevant evidence, though it does not settle every attribution question.
- Separate attribution from identity. A work can be correctly identified as a particular artist’s painting while still leaving uncertainty about which sitting or source image the artist used. Conversely, a photograph can be genuine as an old object while its supposed subject remains unproven.
- Compare independent features. Examine head profile, jawline, nose, ears, hairline and facial proportions across the Maudsley tradition, Rogers-attributed work and death mask. Similarity is corroboration, not a numerical authentication test.
- Read the qualification attached to the claim. “Attributed to,” “associated with,” “after,” “based on” and “confirmed” carry different levels of certainty. Do not silently upgrade a cautious catalog description into a definitive identification.
What “accurate” means in this case
Accuracy has at least three separate meanings. First is identity: is the image actually Joseph Smith? Second is observation: did the maker see Smith directly, and when? Third is fidelity: how closely does the surviving object preserve what the maker saw?
The evidence is strongest for identity and direct observation in the broad history of the 1842 sittings, but weaker for linking every surviving copy to the original sheet or canvas. The death mask offers a different kind of physical comparison because it was made after death. The daguerreotype has the greatest problem at the first step: its subject has not been verified, and a specialist argues that it depicts a painting.
No published source supplies a forensic match percentage, a validated facial-recognition score or a population study that could turn these judgments into a number. Any claim that a portrait is “90 percent accurate,” or that one image has been scientifically proven to be Smith, would exceed the evidence described here.
A concise timeline of the evidence
| Date | Event | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| 25 June 1842 | Smith sits for Sutcliffe Maudsley’s profile drawing | Documented life observation; the original used for later formal work has not been identified |
| September 1842 | Smith’s journal records sittings with “brother [David] Rogers” | Provides a contemporary link to the Rogers-attributed portrait tradition |
| 1844 | George Cannon and Ariah C. Brower make the plaster death mask | Preserves postmortem three-dimensional features |
| 1844 | Lucian Rose Foster opens a photography studio in Nauvoo | Shows that photography was present in Nauvoo; any photograph Foster may have made of Smith is lost |
| March 2008 | Church Public Affairs statement reported by Church News | Available evidence could not confirm the circulating daguerreotype as Smith |
Bottom line for viewers and documentary makers
Joseph Smith’s appearance is best represented as a documented range of contemporary likenesses, not by one authenticated photograph. The Maudsley profile has the clearest record of a life sitting, the Rogers-attributed oil portrait has a significant but debated connection to documented sittings and family provenance, and the death mask supplies postmortem physical evidence. The famous daguerreotype remains unconfirmed, with a specialist argument that it copied a painting. Presenting these distinctions is more accurate than selecting the most familiar face and calling it definitive.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Say something about this film