Reports published in September 2026 describe a disputed divorce over financial support and parenting time—but they do not establish that PK threatened to cut off Dorit Kemsley’s finances and take custody. The accounts summarize competing claims, not a final custody ruling. The latest financial report reviewed was published September 28, 2026, and the custody-related report was published September 22.
Do reports show that PK threatened to cut off finances and take custody?
No. The reports reviewed do not verify that as a single threat. They describe a disagreement over financial responsibility and competing claims about access to the children. Those are allegations attributed to the parties or their lawyers, not findings that a court has made.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills: Season 2 | $23.68 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Real Housewives of Beverly Hills Season 1 | $29.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Beverly Hills Chihuahua 3 (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo) | $9.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
The Lucy Show: TV's First Lady [DVD] | $11.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Beverly Hills Teens - Volume 1 - 32 Eps | $15.62 | Buy on Amazon |
TMZ’s September 28, 2026 report says Dorit alleged that PK controlled the family finances during their marriage and that he had agreed to continue paying bills after their separation. It also describes PK’s contrasting position that he had not promised to pay indefinitely. TMZ’s report on the financial claims summarizes the dispute; it does not establish either account as fact.
What is disputed about financial support and bills?
The disagreement concerns who was responsible for household expenses and support after the separation. In the September 28 report, Dorit reportedly said she learned about utility arrears after the separation. PK reportedly disputed that he had undertaken an open-ended obligation to pay the family’s expenses.
#1 Best Overall
- This is the complete Season 2 (20 episodes) plus the 3-Part Reunion Special AND Lost footage.
Earlier, on July 27, TMZ reported that Dorit’s court papers alleged PK was not paying the mortgage on the home where she lived with the children. Her lawyer, Samantha Spector, argued that PK cited financial struggles when asked to support his wife and dependent children. That is the lawyer’s argument as reported by TMZ, not a court’s conclusion. TMZ’s July report on the mortgage dispute covers Dorit’s side’s position.
What happened to the Los Angeles home?
The property is a distinct part of the financial dispute. TMZ reported on August 26, 2026, that a judge ordered the Los Angeles home sold and assigned PK responsibility for the mortgage and Dorit responsibility for utilities, including past-due bills. The reviewed account is news coverage rather than the order itself, so its description should not be treated as a substitute for the filed order’s exact terms. TMZ’s report on the home and payments describes the reported ruling.
Rank #2
- Factory sealed DVD
The July mortgage allegations and the August report of a sale order are different points in the case. Neither establishes the final outcome of the home or resolves every disagreement about expenses.
What has been reported about custody and parenting time?
TMZ reported on September 22, 2026, that PK opposed Dorit’s support request and alleged that she limited his access to their children. This is PK’s claim as described by the outlet; the report does not establish that a court found it true or issued a final custody order. It also does not substantiate the claim that he threatened to take custody. TMZ’s report on PK’s response and parenting-time allegation summarizes that account.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Rank #3
- Beverly Hills: Chihuahua 3
How to read the reports
- Financial control and bill payments: Dorit’s reported claims and PK’s reported response, in the September 28 account.
- Mortgage and household expenses: Dorit’s reported allegations in July, followed by TMZ’s report of a judge’s home-sale and payment order in August.
- Parenting time: PK’s reported allegation in September; no final custody decision is established by the coverage.
The distinction matters: a party’s claim in a filing, a lawyer’s argument, and a reported court order are not interchangeable. The reports describe an active divorce, and later filings or orders could change what is known.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Factory sealed DVD
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.




