We know what preceded Donald Trump’s “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!” post; we do not know what result he expected. The September 15, 2024 Truth Social post gave no reason. It came five days after Taylor Swift endorsed Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, but timing is context—not proof of Trump’s motive.
What did Trump expect?
The post itself offers no explanation, argument, or stated goal. The archived text is simply “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!” and contemporaneous reporting supplied no further account of what Trump hoped would happen. Any suggestion that he meant to signal to supporters, express displeasure, or attract attention is interpretation, not a reported fact.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
![The Life of a Showgirl[Sweat & Vanilla Perfume Orange Glitter Vinyl]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51kY4q0L+2L._SL160_.jpg)
|
The Life of a Showgirl[Sweat & Vanilla Perfume Orange Glitter Vinyl] | $26.30 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
![Fearless Platinum Edition[2 LP]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51QAe16MRjL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Fearless Platinum Edition[2 LP] | $24.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
![1989 (Taylor's Version)[2 LP]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41bwpFCj9rL._SL160_.jpg)
|
1989 (Taylor's Version)[2 LP] | $44.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
![Red[2 LP]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51reeYJZWoL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Red[2 LP] | $24.97 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
![1989 [2 LP]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41JVbqHmtGL._SL160_.jpg)
|
1989 [2 LP] | $24.99 | Buy on Amazon |
The timing makes Swift’s endorsement relevant: Trump posted five days after she announced her support for Harris and Walz. He had also reportedly said Swift might “pay a price … in the marketplace” for her political position. Those facts make a connection plausible, but they do not establish why he posted or what outcome he wanted. Trump’s Truth archive; Axios.
What happened before the post?
- August 2024: Trump shared AI-generated images on Truth Social that falsely suggested Swift and some of her fans supported him. In response to false images and claims, he wrote, “I accept!” The Guardian.
- September 10: After the presidential debate, Swift said she would vote for Harris and Walz. She called Harris “a steady-handed, gifted leader” and said she believed the country could accomplish more under “calm and not chaos.” Swift also said the falsely attributed AI images had raised her concerns about AI and misinformation and led her to state her actual plans clearly. Swift’s Instagram statement.
- September 11: Axios reported Trump said Swift would “probably pay a price … in the marketplace” for her political position and that he preferred Brittany Mahomes. Axios.
- September 15: At 10:44 a.m. EDT, Trump posted “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!” on Truth Social. The archived post has no accompanying explanation. Trump’s Truth archive.
What the post does—and does not—establish
It establishes that Trump publicly expressed hostility toward Swift. By itself, it does not establish a policy argument, a plan to counter her influence, an expectation of backlash, or a particular electoral aim. The earlier marketplace remark is relevant context, not evidence of the later post’s intended effect.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minute#1 Best Overall
- Taylor Swift's 12th studio album, The Life of a Showgirl, will be released worldwide October 3, 2025
Swift’s own stated reason for speaking out was clearer: she wanted to identify her actual vote after AI-generated images falsely represented her political support. She wrote, “The simplest way to combat misinformation is with the truth.” Swift’s Instagram statement.
What the voter-registration and polling figures show
Reports recorded attention and self-reported reactions to Swift’s endorsement, but neither proves how people voted or that the endorsement caused an election result.
Rank #2
| Measure | Reported figure | What it can establish |
|---|---|---|
| Vote.gov visits after Swift linked the site from an Instagram Story | About 338,000 visits in 15 hours, according to Axios; how many visitors registered was unknown. | Website traffic during that reported window, not completed registrations or votes. Axios |
| Vote.gov visits during the following day | 405,999 visits, according to CBS News. | A separate time window from Axios’s 15-hour count; the figures should not be treated as competing counts for the same period. CBS News |
| ABC-Ipsos poll responses, as reported by Axios | 6% said the endorsement made them more likely to vote for Harris; 13% said less likely; 81% said it made no difference. | Respondents’ stated likelihood, not verified votes or proof of an election effect. Axios |
How the campaign responded—and what backlash claims got wrong
The Harris-Walz campaign answered with “Trump’s Bad Week (Taylor’s Version),” a humorous statement built around Swift song-title references. The Guardian.
Claims that Swift’s political endorsement caused tour dates to be canceled or ended her Coca-Cola partnership were false or misrepresented. FactCheck.org reported that the cancellation story originated on a site labeled as satire, that Swift’s remaining listed U.S. dates were sold out when it reported, and that Coca-Cola said the partnership claim was false. FactCheck.org.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
Rank #3
- The 1989 album changed my life in countless ways, and it fills me with such excitement to announce that my version of it will be out October 27th
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
