Puerto Rican plaintiff Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera is seeking $16 million from Bad Bunny and others, alleging that a phrase she recorded was later used without her authorization in two songs and related promotions. The demand is part of a complaint filed in San Juan on January 5, 2026—not a court award or a finding that the alleged use was unlawful.
Why is Bad Bunny being sued?
Serrano Rivera’s complaint alleges that in 2018 she recorded the phrase “Mira, puñeta, no me quiten el perreo” at the request of producer Roberto J. Rosado, whom she had met while both were studying in the theater program at the Interamerican University of Arecibo. She says she was not told the recording would be used commercially and that there was no negotiation over compensation or any contract, license, or written authorization. The complaint’s introduction describes her account as involving no notice of a commercial or advertising purpose and no negotiated compensation or written permission. The complaint
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Thriller | $19.97 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Rumours | $23.05 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
![Chronicle: The 20 Greatest Hits[2 LP]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/411qOkbEPUL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Chronicle: The 20 Greatest Hits[2 LP] | $27.89 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Purple Rain | $22.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Greatest Hits Volume I & II | $26.97 | Buy on Amazon |
The defendants named include Bad Bunny, whose legal name is Benito A. Martínez Ocasio, Rosado, Rimas Entertainment LLC, Rimas Nation LLC, and other parties. The filing alleges that the phrase was used in recordings and other commercial contexts without consent. Those are Serrano Rivera’s allegations; they have not been established as findings in the case.
Which songs and uses does the complaint identify?
The complaint alleges that the recording appears in “Solo de Mí,” from X 100pre, and “EoO,” from Debí Tirar Más Fotos. It also alleges use at concerts and in promotions and merchandise. These claimed uses are described in the plaintiff’s pleading, not independently established here.
#1 Best Overall
The complaint cites figures of 757 million Spotify streams and 88 million YouTube views for “EoO”; Music Business Worldwide reported those as figures cited in the filing on January 12, 2026. They are pleading-era figures, not verified current totals.
What does the $16 million demand cover?
Serrano Rivera seeks $16 million in damages, divided among claimed categories that include moral rights, privacy and image rights, damages, unjust enrichment, and concert-related claims. The complaint also asks that further use of the recording be stopped. The requested amount and remedies are demands made by the plaintiff; no $16 million award is established by the sources cited here.
Rank #2
- Iconic Album: Rumours stands as one of the best-selling albums in music history, certified nineteen times platinum and widely regarded as the definitive album of the 1970s that transcends genre and generations
- Classic Tracks: Features timeless rock staples including Dreams, Don't Stop, Go Your Own Way, You Make Loving Fun, The Chain, and Gold Dust Woman, creating a collection that reads like a greatest hits package
- Legendary Performances: Showcases the magical collaboration of Stevie Nicks, Lindsey Buckingham, Mick Fleetwood, and the entire band delivering impeccable songwriting and passionate playing on every track
- Vinyl LP Format: This pressing captures the monumental 1977 album by the British-American rock band in authentic vinyl format, preserving the original sound quality and listening experience
- Musical Excellence: A vital rock album that succeeds through its exceptional composition and emotional depth, making it an essential addition to any music collection regardless of your preferred genre
What laws does the complaint invoke?
The pleading invokes Puerto Rico Act No. 55-2012, the Moral Rights of Authors Act, and Act No. 139-2011, the Right of Image Act. It advances legal and damages theories under those laws. The sources cited here do not establish a ruling on the merits of Serrano Rivera’s claims.
What is the case’s current status?
A LegalClarity report dated June 17, 2026, said Bad Bunny and Rimas had obtained a 30-day extension to respond and gave June 8 as the response deadline; it described the case as pending when published. That report does not establish what happened after the deadline. The Puerto Rico Judiciary provides a public case-search page where users can search by party, entity, or case number, but the accessible page text cited here does not show case-specific docket entries. Check the court search for any later filing or order before relying on a present-tense status description.
Rank #3
- Records have been cleaned and new sleeved.
- 2 LP release.
- Made in Spain.
Rolling Stone reported on January 9, 2026, that representatives for Bad Bunny and Rimas had not immediately responded to a request for comment. That was a contemporaneous report, not a statement of their current position.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Is this the same as Bad Bunny’s other voice-recording dispute?
No. The separate dispute involving Carliz de la Cruz Hernández is background only and should not be conflated with Serrano Rivera’s case. The two matters involve different plaintiffs and allegations. The available comparison source cautions against treating them as one case.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- ----------------------------------------
- Availability: Pre-Order
- Format: Vinyl
- Genre: Rock
- Released: 2025-08-22
Rank #4
- A1 - Let's Go Crazy
- A2 - Take Me With U
- A3 - The Beautiful Ones
- A4 - Computer Blue
- A5 - Darling Nikki
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
