Jasmine Pineda and Gino Palazzolo are officially divorced. Their Michigan divorce was finalized on or around June 25–26, 2026, after more than a year of separation and competing filings. Under the reported judgment, Jasmine must pay Gino $20,000 in spousal support—$500 a month for 40 months beginning July 1, 2026.
The pregnancy angle attached to this story is outdated: Jasmine announced in February 2025 that she was expecting a child with Matt Branistareanu, and TLC says their daughter, Matilda, was born on March 21, 2025. Jasmine is not currently pregnant. The “major money-making setback” also appears to combine several separate stories, including her part-time office-cleaning job, a reported dispute over television earnings and unverified claims about sales of Matilda’s paintings.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Great Divorce (Vintage Contemporaries) | $10.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Child Custody A to Z: Winning with Evidence | $17.71 | Buy on Amazon |
The verified divorce news
The legal separation between 90 Day Fiancé personalities Jasmine Pineda and Gino Palazzolo is complete. Court reporting and statements from Gino’s representatives place the finalization of the Michigan divorce on or around June 25, 2026, with additional confirmation published June 26 by Us Weekly and TMZ.
That distinction matters because the couple had been separated and involved in divorce proceedings for months, but a filing is not a final divorce decree. The most significant new development in June 2026 was not that either star had merely “filed,” but that the Michigan case reached its final legal stage and included specific financial terms.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
According to legal documents obtained by Us Weekly, Jasmine was ordered to pay Gino:
- $20,000 in total spousal support;
- $500 per month for 40 months;
- with payments beginning July 1, 2026.
Gino reportedly keeps the couple’s Canton, Michigan, property and a 2015 Ford Explorer. Jasmine keeps the Dunedin, Florida, property. Each person retains the clothing, jewelry, personal effects, furniture and furnishings in their respective homes, according to the reported terms.
The $20,000 should be described as spousal support under the reported judgment—not as repayment, restitution, legal fees or reimbursement for immigration expenses. The available public reporting does not explain the court’s full reasoning for the award, nor does it establish the couple’s complete net worth, total TLC compensation or all of their marital finances.
What Jasmine and Gino’s representatives said
The financial result has been described differently by the two sides.
In a statement reported by TMZ, Jasmine’s representatives said the settlement requires her to provide financial support to Gino. They argued that the outcome provides context for her position against longstanding public claims that she pursued Gino for money. Jasmine’s attorney, Andrew J. Tahmazian, also issued a cease-and-desist warning concerning statements her team considers false and defamatory.
That statement reflects Jasmine’s representatives’ legal and public-relations position. It is not an independent court finding that every accusation made about Jasmine was false.
Gino’s lawyer characterized the result as favorable to Gino, telling Us Weekly that Gino had offered an arrangement in which each person kept their own property. His lawyer said Jasmine sought money to which she was not entitled, in his view, but ultimately Gino would pay her nothing while Jasmine would pay him $20,000.
The neutral takeaway is narrower: the divorce judgment reportedly requires Jasmine to pay spousal support, and both sides have offered competing interpretations of what that means about their broader financial dispute.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Jasmine and Gino’s divorce timeline
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| 2019 | Jasmine and Gino reportedly met online. |
| June 2023 | They married in Michigan. |
| April 22, 2024 | Gino’s Michigan divorce filing listed this as their separation date, according to Us Weekly. |
| July 2025 | Gino filed for divorce in Michigan. |
| August 2025 | Jasmine filed a separate divorce case in Florida. |
| October 2025 | TMZ reported that Jasmine pursued service by newspaper publication in Pinellas County after reportedly being unable to serve Gino at his Michigan home. Gino’s lawyer disputed that account and said Gino had filed first and that Jasmine refused service. |
| March 26, 2026 | Us Weekly reported that the divorce was still pending, with disputes involving custody, property, debts and financial records. |
| June 25–26, 2026 | The Michigan divorce was finalized, according to court reporting and statements from representatives. |
The timeline corrects a major problem with a January 2, 2026 article that claimed Jasmine was already officially divorced. That article was published while the divorce was still pending. Its suggestion that Jasmine was still pregnant was also incorrect by that point: Matilda had been born in March 2025.
How Jasmine’s pregnancy with Matt fits into the story
Jasmine announced her pregnancy on February 18, 2025, while she was still legally married to Gino. She said the child was conceived with Matt Branistareanu, with whom she had become involved during the couple’s open-marriage storyline on 90 Day: The Last Resort. TLC later reported that Gino regretted agreeing to the arrangement. The pregnancy announcement was covered by Us Weekly and TLC’s tell-all recap.
TLC identifies the child as Matilda and gives her birth date as March 21, 2025. TLC’s photo coverage is available here.
Therefore, the accurate current description is that Jasmine welcomed a daughter with Matt in March 2025 while she was still legally married to Gino. It is not accurate to describe her as currently pregnant or to present the divorce as having been finalized “amid pregnancy” in 2026.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Was Gino Matilda’s father?
Public coverage distinguishes biological parentage from possible legal-parentage issues:
- Gino said during a 90 Day tell-all that he was not Matilda’s biological father, as reported by Us Weekly.
- Matt was publicly identified as the biological father in the televised storyline and related reporting.
- Because Jasmine was still married to Gino when Matilda was born, an attorney explained to Us Weekly that Gino could potentially have been presumed the legal father under Florida law, even though Matt was identified as the biological father.
- Us Weekly reported in March 2026 that Gino intended to file a motion concerning a child born out of wedlock. The report also said he did not seek parenting time and wanted Jasmine to have sole legal and physical custody.
The available reporting does not establish that Gino was finally declared Matilda’s legal father, nor does it show a final public paternity ruling. It is safer to say that the possibility of a legal presumption and related court issues were reported—not that Gino became Matilda’s father or was formally removed as one.
What is the alleged “major money-making setback”?
There is no single verified event that matches that phrase. It appears to blend three different topics and a layer of fan speculation.
1. Jasmine’s office-cleaning job
Jasmine’s part-time office-cleaning work is real and was directly addressed by TLC on February 18, 2026. In TLC’s account, Jasmine described the job as honest work that helped her pay for real-estate courses. She said she was pursuing a future in real estate.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsThat confirms the job, but not the claim that she took it because she had run out of TLC money. A separate report from TV Season & Spoilers framed the job through fan speculation about Jasmine’s finances. Public reporting does not prove that she was broke, financially ruined, forced to work or had exhausted her reality-TV income.
2. A reported dispute over TLC earnings
There was also a reported disagreement over television-related money. In October 2025, TMZ reported, citing sources, that Jasmine was upset because Gino allegedly wanted to keep money she had earned from the TLC series. The report connected the dispute to an allegation that payments had been made to Gino while Jasmine did not have a work permit. Gino’s attorney separately said he believed Jasmine owed Gino money.
Us Weekly later reported that Jasmine sought financial records relating to bank accounts, income, compensation, appearance fees and residual earnings tied to television and media appearances. Those reports show that money was part of the divorce dispute, but they do not establish:
Rank #2
- how much TLC or appearance income was involved;
- whether Gino legally retained any of it;
- the exact structure of the payments;
- whether work authorization affected a specific payment;
- whether the final judgment separately resolved all claims concerning television income.
That makes the TLC-earnings issue a reported financial dispute, not proof that Jasmine suffered a defined “money-making setback.” The available material also does not provide her complete immigration file, work-authorization dates or contractual payment arrangements.
3. Reported sales of Matilda’s paintings
TV Season & Spoilers reported that Jasmine sold one of Matilda’s paintings for $200 and another for $3,000, allegedly placing the proceeds into a trust fund. The report can be read here.
Those sales are weakly sourced in the available coverage. They were not independently confirmed by TLC, Us Weekly, TMZ, a cited court filing or a directly verifiable sales record. They should not be treated as established facts without checking Jasmine’s original social-media posts and preserving evidence of the transactions. Calling the activity a “money-making scheme” or “grifting” is an editorial characterization, not a neutral court finding.
What remains unknown about Jasmine’s finances
There are no reliable public figures in the available reporting for Jasmine’s total TLC income, social-media earnings, Cameo revenue, net worth or overall financial position. The reported judgment establishes the $20,000 support obligation and certain property allocations; it does not establish that Jasmine is broke, secretly wealthy, dependent on Gino or financially ruined.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why the original headline is misleading
The supplied headline combines events from different years and presents them as if they happened at the same time:
Recommended Free Tools
- “Divorce news”: the divorce was not finalized in January 2026. It was finalized in Michigan in June 2026.
- “Amid pregnancy”: Jasmine announced the pregnancy in February 2025, and Matilda was born March 21, 2025.
- “Major money-making setback”: no reliable source proves a single financial collapse. The phrase appears to mix her cleaning job, a disputed TLC-payment issue and an unverified painting-sales report.
The January 2 article also referred to pregnancy complications without providing reliable evidence of a specific medical event. No source in the available reporting from Jasmine, Matt, TLC, a representative or a reliable contemporaneous outlet verifies such complications. That claim should not be repeated as fact.
The most defensible current headline is therefore about the finalized divorce and the reported support order, with the pregnancy used only as background to the legal and relationship timeline.
Settlement, judgment and property division are not the same thing
Some reports describe the case as a settlement or mediated agreement, while others focus on the court hearing and judgment. The safest description is that the Michigan court finalized the divorce after the couple reached an agreement that included a reported spousal-support order.
The support obligation should also be kept separate from the asset division:
- Spousal support: Jasmine reportedly pays Gino $20,000 over 40 months.
- Real estate: Gino retains the Canton home, while Jasmine retains the Dunedin home.
- Vehicle: Gino receives the 2015 Ford Explorer.
- Personal property: Each keeps personal belongings and furnishings in the respective homes.
- Television income: the public reporting describes a dispute, but does not establish the final accounting.
Nothing in the available material proves that the $20,000 was reimbursement for cosmetic procedures, immigration expenses, TLC earnings, household spending or legal fees.
What the final record does—and does not—show
| Claim | Evidence level |
|---|---|
| Jasmine and Gino are divorced | Strongly reported through court coverage and representative statements |
| Jasmine owes Gino $20,000 | Reported from legal documents obtained by Us Weekly |
| Payments are $500 for 40 months beginning July 1, 2026 | Reported from the judgment |
| Jasmine works part time cleaning offices | Confirmed through Jasmine’s explanation published by TLC |
| Jasmine ran out of TLC money | Unverified speculation |
| Gino legally retained Jasmine’s TLC earnings | Not established by the available public material |
| Matilda’s paintings sold for $200 and $3,000 | Weakly sourced secondary reporting; requires original-post verification |
| Jasmine experienced pregnancy complications | Not verified |
| Gino was legally declared Matilda’s father | Not established in the available coverage |
| Gino owes Jasmine money under the final judgment | Not established in the available public material |
The bottom line on Jasmine and Gino
Jasmine Pineda and Gino Palazzolo are officially divorced as of June 2026. The clearest financial term is Jasmine’s reported obligation to pay Gino $20,000 in spousal support at $500 per month for 40 months, while the two keep specified properties and personal assets.
Jasmine’s pregnancy is no longer ongoing: she and Matt welcomed Matilda in March 2025. The public record also does not prove that Jasmine ran out of TLC money, that her cleaning job reflects financial ruin or that the reported painting sales occurred as described. The verified story is a finalized divorce with a support order—not a January 2026 divorce during an active pregnancy or a proven collapse in Jasmine’s income.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are Jasmine Pineda and Gino Palazzolo officially divorced?
Yes. Their Michigan divorce was finalized on or around June 25–26, 2026, according to court reporting and statements from representatives.
Is Jasmine Pineda currently pregnant?
No. Jasmine announced her pregnancy with Matt Branistareanu in February 2025, and TLC says their daughter, Matilda, was born on March 21, 2025.
How much does Jasmine have to pay Gino?
According to legal documents reported by Us Weekly, Jasmine must pay Gino $20,000 in spousal support at $500 per month for 40 months beginning July 1, 2026.
Did Gino become Matilda’s legal father?
The available public reporting does not establish a final paternity ruling. Gino said he was not the biological father, while reports noted that his marriage to Jasmine at the time of Matilda’s birth could have raised a potential legal-presumption issue.
Did Jasmine lose all of her TLC money?
That has not been established. TMZ reported a dispute over television-related earnings, but the available coverage does not show how much money was involved, who legally controlled it or whether the final judgment resolved every related claim.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →The Bottom Line
Bottom line: The accurate current story is that Jasmine Pineda and Gino Palazzolo finalized their Michigan divorce in June 2026, and Jasmine was ordered to pay Gino $20,000 in spousal support. Jasmine’s pregnancy with Matt Branistareanu ended with the March 21, 2025 birth of their daughter, Matilda, so she should not be described as currently pregnant. Claims that Jasmine has run out of TLC money or suffered a major financial collapse remain unverified.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
