The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Proven Industries advertised its Model 651 trailer lock surviving a sledgehammer, bolt cutters, and a crowbar. Trevor McNally, the creator behind McNallyOfficial, answered with a quieter demonstration: he opened the roughly $130 lock in seconds using a shim cut from an aluminum beverage can.
The video approached 10 million YouTube views. Proven sued McNally in federal court, seeking—among other remedies—to restrict his videos. A judge denied the company’s preliminary-injunction request, and Proven voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit in July 2025. That was not a final trial ruling on every factual or legal issue, but it made the dispute a powerful case study in product security, fair use, crisis communications, and the Streisand effect.
The dispute in one sentence
McNally demonstrated a repeatable bypass of a Proven Model 651 latch-pin lock, while Proven argued that the videos omitted important testing context and misrepresented the product; the company’s attempt to fight the criticism in court failed to obtain emergency suppression and ended without a merits trial.
Who is Trevor McNally?
Trevor McNally, known online as McNallyOfficial, publishes short, frequently wordless demonstrations involving locks and physical-security devices. His videos use techniques such as picking, shimming, striking, and other forms of bypass.
#1 Best Overall
- Connect to 2.4GHz WiFi, No Hub Needed：Connect your Philips 4200 Series Wifi Door Lock Deadbolt directly to your home WiFi network—no extra hub or bridge required. Manage your door anytime, anywhere through your smartphone. 𝙉𝙊𝙏𝙀: Please keep the smart lock within 33 ft (10 m) of your Wi-Fi router. Minimize obstacles such as walls, metal objects, and interference sources for a stronger connection.
- App Control with Real-Time Access：Control smart lock remotely via the Philips Home Access App: lock/unlock, manage user codes/fingerprints, check your door lock status, and monitor access history in real time, etc, whether you’re at work or on vacation.
- Voice Assistant Compatible：Hands full? No problem. Use voice commands with Alexa or Google Assistant to lock or check the status of your front door lock set effortlessly.
- Versatile Passcode Options: This Keypad deadbolt supports permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring PIN codes—perfect for family, guests, housekeepers, or Airbnb use. Easily manage and share access through the app for ultimate convenience and control.
- 0.3S Fingerprint Fast Access：With this fingerprint keyless entry door lock, unlock your door in 0.3 seconds with fast, secure biometric access. Store multiple fingerprints for family and trusted visitors.
Ars Technica reported that, at the time of the lawsuit, McNally had more than seven million followers and more than two billion total views across platforms. Those figures describe his audience at that point, not verified totals for 2026. His former U.S. Marine background is part of his public persona, but it is not evidence that any particular lock test was technically conclusive.
McNally should also not be conflated with the separately branded LockPickingLawyer. McNally has been associated with Covert Instruments, a company selling lock-picking products, which may be relevant to disclosure and perceived incentives but does not, by itself, disprove his demonstration.
How the video conflict began
On March 3, 2025, Proven published a promotional video defending its Model 651 latch-pin trailer lock against claims that the latch pin could be easily broken off. The demonstration showed the lock resisting a sledgehammer, bolt cutters, and a crowbar.
That was a brute-force test. On April 3, McNally posted a response using a thin shim cut from an aluminum beverage can. He opened the lock within seconds while casually drinking juice and swinging his legs. According to Proven’s amended complaint, McNally used approximately 15 seconds of Proven’s roughly 90-second promotional video in the response.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsThe contrast made the clip exceptionally shareable: Proven presented a product resisting dramatic physical attacks; McNally suggested that a thin piece of improvised metal could defeat a different part of the mechanism. The two demonstrations were not testing the same property.
What McNally actually demonstrated
The first viral video showed a bypass demonstration, not an actual theft and not a comprehensive security certification. McNally did not verbally explain the technique in that initial video. The argument was made through editing and visual juxtaposition.
Proven later challenged the conditions. In its amended complaint, the company alleged that McNally had previously inspected the lock, understood its internal mechanism, prepared a specialized shim, and tested a loose lock rather than one installed on a trailer. Those are allegations from a pleading, not facts established at trial.
Rank #2
- 𝐅𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐔𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤: Unlock the way you want: app, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, or voice via Alexa/Google Assistant. Everyone in the family can choose what works best — convenience meets flexibility. Batteries are not included.
- 𝐔𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤 𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐀𝐧𝐲𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞: Built-in Wi-Fi lets you lock and unlock your door remotely anytime, anywhere from your smartphone — no extra hub needed. Stay connected and in control, even when you’re at work or on vacation. Only support 2.4Ghz network. Keep the router and lock with 65ft for better remote control.
- 𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆: Pair with Alexa or Google Assistant to unlock or lock with your voice. Great for when your hands are full or you're relaxing at home and still welcome who’s at the door. Note: Please log in to your own Google or Alexa account first before use Voice Control and make sure your network connection is stable.
- 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗞𝗲𝘆: Just one touch unlocks the door instantly. No need to search for keys — Your fingers is your keys, perfect for busy mornings. Philips wifi lock store multiple prints for easy family access.
- 𝐂𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐌𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐒𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞: Create up to 100 custom passcodes for family, friends, or renters. Easily share unlimited one-time or scheduled codes to guests, cleaners, or deliveries— no need to be home to open the door.
McNally gave a different account in a sworn declaration. He said the lock was not altered, that his shim used a simple hook profile, and that the bypass was recorded in one continuous take. He also said he bought new Model 651 locks from an Amazon delivery kiosk, opened the packaging on camera, cut the shim without measurements, and repeated the bypass on follow-up videos published May 23 and May 25.
A Proven employee was reportedly able to duplicate the technique. That strengthens the case that the mechanism permitted a genuine bypass. It does not answer every practical-security question about how the attack works when the lock is installed, how much practice is required, or whether all Model 651 configurations behave identically.
Why the testing conditions mattered
A responsible security analysis must separate attack time from preparation time and a loose-device demonstration from an installed attack.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Was the lock new and unmodified? | A previously opened, altered, or disassembled sample could produce a misleading result. |
| Which core and internal configuration were used? | Different cylinders, springs, latch arrangements, or production revisions may respond differently. |
| Was the lock mounted on its intended trailer or hitch? | Installation can limit access, leverage, hand position, and tool movement. |
| How many samples were tested? | Repeatability helps distinguish a design weakness from a one-off defect. |
| How was the shim made? | A readily available improvised object presents a different risk from a custom tool requiring specialist fabrication. |
| How much skill was required? | A bypass can be real yet impractical for an ordinary opportunistic thief. |
| Did the attack leave visible damage? | Detection risk and whether the lock can be relocked affect real-world severity. |
| What threat was the product designed to address? | Protection from casual tampering is not the same as resistance to a determined attacker. |
The central technical conclusion should therefore be narrow: McNally demonstrated a bypass of the Model 651 mechanism under the conditions shown. Repeatability is meaningful evidence of a design vulnerability, but it does not automatically prove that a thief can defeat every Proven lock, every production revision, or every mounted installation in seconds.
What Proven alleged in court
Proven filed Proven Industries, Inc. v. Trevor McNally, No. 8:25-cv-01119, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida on May 1, 2025. Its amended complaint listed eight causes of action:
Recommended Free Tools
- Copyright infringement.
- Defamation by implication.
- False advertising.
- Violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
- Tortious interference with business relationships.
- Unjust enrichment.
- Civil conspiracy.
- Trade libel.
The complaint’s central theory was that McNally’s silent, mocking presentation falsely implied that Proven’s lock was inherently insecure and that the company had deceived consumers. Proven also argued that using excerpts from its promotional video was not protected by fair use.
Those claims came from Proven’s pleading. A complaint is a party’s statement of allegations, not a judicial finding that the allegations are true.
Rank #3
- 6 Ways to Unlock: Unlock with a touch for less than 1s with fingerprint lock. You can also open your front door lock via the eufy Security app, using the keypad or physical key, from Apple Watch, or use your voice with Alexa/Google Voice Assistant.
- 8 Months Battery Life: With 8 AA batteries, Smart Lock C220 runs around 8 months. Experience ultimate convenience and peace of mind with our long-lasting power solution. *May vary depending on the frequency of the lock being used.
- Self-learning AI: Fingerprint door lock recognition gets more precise with every touch, so you don't have to try agian and again to get in. Never be awkward or upset at unlocking the door.
- Control from Anywhere with Built-in Wi-Fi: No bridge required, you can control your wifi smart lock from anywhere via the eufy Security app. Easy setup.
- Integrated eufy ecosystem: If you have a eufy doorbell, you can add your wifi door lock to your routines and control devices together for keyless entry within the eufy Security app.
The copyright and fair-use issue
The copyright claim focused on McNally’s use of part of Proven’s promotional video in his response. The fair-use analysis would ordinarily consider four factors:
- Purpose and character: Criticism, commentary, parody, and transformation generally support fair use. Monetization does not automatically defeat it.
- Nature of the work: A factual or promotional marketing video may receive less protection than a highly creative work.
- Amount used: The percentage and importance of the excerpt matter, not merely the number of seconds.
- Market effect: A criticism video that comments on the original is different from a substitute that serves the same market.
At the preliminary-injunction hearing, Judge Mary Scriven reportedly characterized the use as transformative criticism and declined to stop the videos. That was an interlocutory decision about emergency relief—not a final merits ruling after discovery and trial.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallThe June 13 injunction hearing
Proven sought emergency relief that would have restricted McNally’s videos while the case proceeded. The hearing reportedly included an unusually concrete question: whether the parties had brought a lock and a beverage can for a live demonstration.
A Proven employee reportedly acknowledged being able to reproduce McNally’s technique. Judge Scriven denied Proven’s preliminary-injunction request on June 13, 2025.
Winning or losing a preliminary injunction is not the same as winning or losing the entire case. The requesting party must satisfy a demanding emergency standard, including showing a likelihood of success and that immediate relief is warranted. The denial meant Proven had not met that standard at that stage. It did not finally decide every claim, nor did it constitute a ruling that every Proven lock was unsafe.
How the lawsuit ended
Proven voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit in July 2025, roughly two months after filing. The company did not obtain the requested preliminary injunction, and the case did not proceed to a reported trial judgment resolving the competing accounts.
The legally accurate summary is therefore limited:
- McNally publicly demonstrated a bypass of a Proven Model 651 lock.
- Proven sued over the videos and their presentation.
- The judge denied Proven’s request for preliminary relief.
- Proven later voluntarily dismissed the action.
It is inaccurate to say that Proven lost at trial, that a court declared the lock defective, or that McNally received a final ruling validating every statement in his videos. It is equally inaccurate to treat the dismissal as proof that Proven’s allegations were true.
Rank #4
- ANYWHERE ACCESS: With built-in WiFi compatibility, you can easily and securely connect your Schlage Encode Deadbolt to your home WiFi network to control and monitor your home from anywhere with the Schlage Home app
- PEACE OF MIND: Lock and unlock from anywhere, manage up to 100 access codes for keyless entry, view lock history, receive customizable notifications and easily manage multiple locks at once - all when paired to the Schlage Home app and connected to a secure WiFi network
- VOICE CONTROL: Works with Alexa and Google Home for optional, hands-free convenience when paired with the Schlage Home app and a voice enabled device
- ADVANCED SECURITY: Secure, encrypted connection; built-in, customizable alarm for door movement and forced entry attempts; fingerprint-resistant touchscreen; certified highest residential Security, Durability and Finish rating by BHMA industry experts
- EASY INSTALL: Install in minutes with just a screwdriver, no hardwiring required; Snap ‘n Stay design helps keep the lock on the door so both hands are free; fits standard doors with 1-3/8 in to 1-3/4 in door thickness and 2-3/8 in or 2-3/4 in backset
Why the lawsuit became a Streisand-effect event
The dispute illustrates the difference between correcting criticism and trying to suppress it.
Proven could have acknowledged the bypass, identified the affected configuration, published realistic installation guidance, offered replacement or upgrade options, and invited independent testing. Instead, the public confrontation, takedown efforts, and lawsuit made the demonstration easier to find.
Litigation can amplify a story in several ways:
- A threatened or filed lawsuit creates a second news story around the original criticism.
- Takedown notices can encourage people to seek copies of the targeted material.
- Court filings make allegations, exhibits, and competing narratives searchable.
- A request to suppress a viral video can motivate additional viewers to watch it.
- The company’s credibility can suffer when its legal strategy appears more aggressive than its technical response.
That does not mean litigation is never justified. A lawsuit may be appropriate where a creator knowingly fabricates testing, publishes provably false commercial claims, infringes protected material, or directs targeted harassment. Product criticism alone is not automatically actionable, and an unflattering demonstration is not the same thing as defamation or false advertising.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
The harassment question
McNally’s audience reportedly directed abusive attention toward Proven and its personnel. That conduct was not justified by the underlying product dispute.
The parties’ conduct must be kept separate. McNally’s sworn declaration says he did not direct or encourage harassment, false reviews, or publication of personal phone numbers. Without evidence establishing otherwise, the responsible account is that individual audience members’ actions should not be automatically attributed to McNally.
Criticism can be protected while harassment, doxxing, threats, and coordinated abuse remain unacceptable. A creator who publishes a provocative security video has responsibilities around audience behavior, but responsibility should not be assigned beyond the evidence.
What this episode proves—and what it does not
It does support
- That a McNally video showed a Model 651 latch-pin lock being bypassed with an aluminum-can shim.
- That the bypass was reportedly repeatable, including by a Proven employee.
- That the original video drew enormous attention, approaching 10 million YouTube views according to reported coverage.
- That Proven did not obtain emergency suppression of the videos.
- That Proven voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit in July 2025.
It does not establish
- That every Proven lock or every Model 651 configuration is equally vulnerable.
- That a mounted lock can always be defeated in seconds.
- That the attack requires no practice or prior knowledge.
- That the video was a complete product test or a measurement of theft risk.
- That every allegation in Proven’s complaint was false.
- That McNally’s statements were finally adjudicated as protected at trial.
- That audience harassment was directed by McNally.
- That the incident establishes a security ranking for the trailer-lock industry.
What consumers should learn
Consumers evaluating trailer or hitch locks should treat a brute-force demonstration as narrow evidence. A lock that resists a sledgehammer may still have weaknesses against shimming, picking, prying, drilling, or attacks on its mounting point.
Best Value
- Passcode Entry: This keypad lock offers 20 access codes for family use and a temporary code for single-use guest entry
- One-Time Code: A one-time PIN code can be set for door opening and will automatically be deleted after use
- Smart Locking: Features an automatic door lock that can be set to lock in 10-99 seconds (off by default) and one-touch auto-lock by pressing and holding any key on the keypad for 2 seconds
- Long Battery Life & Low Battery Indicator: Powered by 4 AA batteries (not included), lasts up to 365 days. A red light indicator alerts you when battery level drops below 15%
- Security Deadbolt: Provides reliable home protection with its sturdy aluminum alloy construction, weather resistance (IP54), durability, anti-peeping user code protection, low battery indicator, and solid lock cylinder
- Look for testing against multiple attack classes, not one dramatic tool.
- Check whether the test was performed installed or with the lock loose.
- Identify the exact model, cylinder, core, and production configuration.
- Ask whether the product offers replaceable or upgraded security components.
- Consider corrosion resistance, compatibility, and whether the lock can be relocked after an attack.
- Distinguish attack time from the time needed to prepare a tool or learn a technique.
- Match the product to a threat model: casual tampering, opportunistic theft, or a determined attacker.
- Prefer transparent independent testing over marketing claims based on a single demonstration.
After a bypass demonstration, the most useful company response is usually technical: explain the affected conditions, test multiple samples, disclose limitations, remediate the mechanism, and tell customers what to do next.
The durable lesson
This was not simply a story about a YouTuber embarrassing a lock company. It was a three-layer dispute.
Technically, the video raised a credible question about whether the Model 651’s latch mechanism could be shimmed. Legally, Proven alleged copyright infringement, defamation, false advertising, trade libel, and related claims, but never obtained preliminary suppression and never reached a final merits judgment. Strategically, suing the critic appears to have transformed a niche physical-security demonstration into a much larger internet-law and crisis-communications story.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did McNally prove that every Proven lock was insecure?
No. He demonstrated a bypass of a Model 651 lock under the conditions shown. That does not establish that every Proven product, configuration, or installed lock can be defeated in the same way.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Did Proven lose the lawsuit?
Proven failed to obtain a preliminary injunction and voluntarily dismissed the case in July 2025. There was no reported trial ruling deciding all claims.
Did the judge rule that McNally’s video was fair use?
The judge reportedly treated the use as transformative criticism when denying emergency relief. That preliminary decision was not a final merits ruling after trial.
Was McNally responsible for harassment of Proven employees?
Audience members reportedly engaged in abusive conduct. McNally’s sworn declaration says he did not direct or encourage harassment, false reviews, or publication of phone numbers; the available account should distinguish his conduct from that of individual viewers.
The Bottom Line
McNally’s video exposed a real bypass question, but not a universal verdict on Proven’s entire product line. Proven’s lawsuit failed to secure emergency suppression and ended in voluntary dismissal—turning an uncomfortable product-security demonstration into a much bigger lesson about fair criticism, transparent remediation, and the Streisand effect.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
