Recommended Free Tools
Catherine Corcoran sued companies and people associated with Terrifier, alleging that she was promised a share of the film’s profits but was not fully paid, and that her topless filming and nude imagery were handled without the informed written consent she says was required. Her complaint also describes physically difficult filming conditions. The defendants deny the allegations. A docket listing shows that a motion to dismiss was under submission on March 13, 2026; the listing consulted does not show a later ruling.
Why is Catherine Corcoran suing over Terrifier?
Corcoran, who played Dawn Emerson in the 2016 film, is suing over two central issues: compensation and consent. Her complaint alleges that she accepted a low daily rate in return for a share of profits from Terrifier and related franchise revenue, and that the promised payments and accounting did not materialize as agreed. It also alleges that she was not given the required informed written consent process for topless nudity and that nude photographs were taken without her consent.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
![Terrifier [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41bchqEAOmL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Terrifier [Blu-ray] | $13.43 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
![Terrifier 2: Collector’s Edition [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51JGk5eje6L._SL160_.jpg)
|
Terrifier 2: Collector’s Edition [Blu-ray] | $11.69 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
![Terrifier 3-Movie Collection [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51tFwOsAniL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Terrifier 3-Movie Collection [Blu-ray] | $33.20 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
![Terrifier 2 (Steelbook) [4K UHD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51dV-DYTlIL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Terrifier 2 (Steelbook) [4K UHD] | $21.34 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Damien Leone's Terrifier Trilogy 3 Bluray Collection | $79.36 | Buy on Amazon |
These are allegations in a civil lawsuit, not findings by a court. The defendants’ attorneys have denied the claims and said they will defend the case.
What payment did Corcoran say she was promised?
Reporting on the complaint says Corcoran alleges she agreed to work for $100 per day in exchange for 1% of profits from the film and related future films and merchandise. The complaint’s reported description also encompasses licensing and other franchise revenue. That is Corcoran’s account of the agreement; its precise scope and interpretation have not been established by a court.
#1 Best Overall
- A maniacal clown named Art terrorizes three young women on Halloween night and everyone else who stands in his way.
The figures reported from her side are not identical because they refer to different dates and categories. Variety reported that the complaint said she had received $1,816.35 in back pay through July 2024 and approximately $6,408.26 in merchandise royalties. Us Weekly later reported that she had received around $8,300 in total by October 2025. These are reported allegations, not a judicial accounting or a final calculation of damages.
Variety also reported that the two sequels had earned more than $105 million in worldwide box office. That figure is not the same as profit or net sales under the alleged deal, and it does not establish what Corcoran is owed. The available reporting does not provide a complete accounting or an independently audited calculation; box-office revenue cannot simply be multiplied by 1% to determine a payment.
Rank #2
- Terrifier 2: Edizione da collezione
- Tipo di prodotto: PHYSICAL_MOVIE
What does the lawsuit allege about nudity and filming conditions?
Corcoran alleges that she was not provided informed written consent before filming a scene requiring topless nudity, and that photographs of her nude body were taken without consent. Reporting on the complaint also describes her being suspended upside down during an extended shoot and says she later experienced health effects. Those descriptions remain allegations; the sources reviewed do not establish that a court has found the conduct or injuries occurred as alleged.
What do the defendants say?
The filmmakers’ attorneys deny the complaint’s claims. Their reported statement was: “Damien and Phil deny the claims in the complaint and will vigorously defend this lawsuit.” The available reporting does not provide a full counter-accounting or a merits ruling resolving the parties’ competing positions.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesRank #3
What is the status of the case?
The case is listed as Catherine Corcoran v. Dark Age Cinema, LLC et al., No. 2:2025cv10284, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The Justia docket listing records Corcoran’s first amended complaint on January 9, 2026, the defendants’ motion to dismiss on January 23, briefing later that February, and a March 13 hearing at which Judge Andre Birotte Jr. took the motion under submission.
As of the docket listing consulted, no later ruling is shown. “Under submission” means the motion was awaiting the court’s decision in that listing; it does not mean the motion was granted or denied, or that the lawsuit was resolved. Justia points readers to PACER for official filings, and its listing may not reflect later activity. View the Justia docket listing.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
- After being resurrected by a sinister entity, Art the Clown returns to Miles County where he targets a teenage girl and her younger brother on Halloween night.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
