Recommended Free Tools
Robin Thicke and Paula Patton announced in February 2014 that they had mutually decided to separate. Patton filed for divorce in October 2014, citing irreconcilable differences. The divorce settled in 2015 on property and custody of their son, Julian, but the terms were never made public. The couple’s dispute returned to court in January 2017, when a judge refused Patton’s emergency request to change the custody arrangement and temporary restrictions were then placed on Thicke. The coverage from those years mixes joint statements, court filings, judicial rulings and competing accounts, so the sequence is clearer when each kind of source is kept separate. This article covers reporting through January 2017; it does not address developments after that date.
Timeline at a glance
| Date | Event | Source type | Status of the claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Thicke and Patton marry | Reporting by TIME, February 2014 | Reported fact |
| 2010 | The couple’s son, Julian, is born | Reporting by TIME, February 2014 | Reported fact |
| February 2014 | Mutual separation announced | Joint statement | Stated by both parties |
| February 21, 2014 | Separation date listed in the divorce filing | Court filing, as reported by the Los Angeles Times | Date stated in the filing |
| July 2014 | Thicke explains the split on radio | Radio interview, as reported by the Los Angeles Times | Thicke’s own account |
| October 2014 | Patton files for divorce | Court filing in Los Angeles Superior Court | Filed; not adjudicated at that point |
| April 14, 2015 | Divorce becomes final under a stipulated judgment | Court record, as reported by the Los Angeles Times | Settled; terms not public |
| January 13, 2017 | Judge denies Patton’s emergency request to change custody | Court ruling, as reported by ABC News | Denied; Patton’s allegations and Thicke’s denial both reported |
| Later in January 2017 | Temporary restraining order and monitored visits | Court order, as reported by the Los Angeles Times | Temporary, pending a hearing |
The February 2014 separation
The couple announced the split together, and their statement is the only account from the two of them at that stage. As TIME reported it, Thicke and Patton said: “We will always love each other and be best friends, however, we have mutually decided to separate at this time.” TIME also reported that Thicke met Patton when he was 14. That detail comes from the reporting and was not independently confirmed in the coverage cited here.
Patton’s October 2014 divorce filing
Patton filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, citing irreconcilable differences. The petition asked for joint legal and physical custody of their son. The Los Angeles Times reported that the filing listed February 21, 2014 as the date of separation, which is a week before the public announcement reported by TIME. A filing states what one party is requesting; it is not a finding by a court.
Thicke’s explanation
In a July 2014 radio interview, as quoted by the Los Angeles Times, Thicke said: “We’re apart because we just couldn’t be together anymore…. There’s a hundred different reasons; there isn’t just one. There’s a long list…. I got a little too selfish and a little too greedy and a little too full of myself.”
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →#1 Best Overall
This is his own account, given publicly, and it does not describe the marriage in full. He did not name a single cause, and his comments do not settle the private history between the two of them.
The 2015 divorce settlement
The couple reached a settlement covering property and custody. The Los Angeles Times reported that the divorce would become final on April 14, 2015, under a stipulated judgment. The terms of that judgment were not made public in the coverage, so the division of property and the specific custody provisions cannot be described from the reporting that exists.
Rank #2
The January 2017 custody dispute
The emergency request is denied
On January 13, 2017, ABC News reported that a judge denied Patton’s emergency request to change the custody agreement. The judge found the evidence insufficient for emergency relief. The ABC News account included allegations made in Patton’s court papers, along with Thicke’s denial and his response to them. The ruling addressed whether emergency relief was warranted, not whether the underlying allegations were true.
Temporary restrictions follow
Later that month, the Los Angeles Times reported that a temporary restraining order required Thicke to stay away from Patton and limited him to monitored visits with their son until a hearing. The report also included Patton’s allegations and the response from Thicke’s attorneys. These were interim orders in a continuing case. They were not the release of a final custody judgment.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →How to read the claims
- Joint statements show what both parties agreed to say publicly. They say nothing about fault.
- Court filings show what one party asked for. A petition can contain allegations that are later denied, withdrawn or never tested.
- Rulings and orders show what a judge decided at a particular stage, on a particular standard. An emergency denial is not a verdict on the merits, and a temporary order is not a permanent one.
- Personal comments, such as Thicke’s radio remarks, show one person’s account at one point in time.
When you read about the 2017 dispute, attribute each accusation to the filing that made it and place the denial next to it. The coverage from this period does not establish any allegation as proven.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the coverage does not establish
- The private reasons the marriage ended. Thicke’s own list of reasons is the most detailed public account, and it is incomplete by his own description.
- The terms of the 2015 property and custody settlement.
- Whether any allegation made in the 2017 filings was ultimately upheld.
- The custody arrangement in effect after January 2017. The orders reported that month were temporary.
Anyone looking for a single explanation or a current custody status will need court records or reporting from after January 2017, which are outside the scope of this article.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
