Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →In December 2024, Dinesh D’Souza said surveillance videos used in 2000 Mules may not have been matched to the cellphone geolocation data. He apologized to Mark Andrews, a Georgia voter whom the film portrayed as committing a crime. The admission concerns how footage and location records were linked; it was not a retraction of every claim the film made about the 2020 election.
What D’Souza said was wrong
D’Souza said his team had been assured that each video showed someone who had made at least 10 visits to ballot drop boxes, as indicated by geolocation records. He later said: “We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.” He said the footage had been characterized using inaccurate information supplied to him and his team, and apologized to Andrews. The Associated Press reported his statement on December 2, 2024.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
2000 Mules &Trump Card – 2 DVD Combo Set | $19.95 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
![2000 Mules by Dinesh D'Souza DVD [NTSC] [Region 1]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51bLQ3h2DhL._SL160_.jpg)
|
2000 Mules by Dinesh D'Souza DVD [NTSC] [Region 1] | $14.95 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
2000 Mules Combo... (DVD) | $24.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Trump Card | $5.99 | Buy on Amazon |
The 10-visit figure describes what D’Souza said his team had been told about the film’s method. It is not an independently validated finding that the people shown in particular clips made those visits.
Why Mark Andrews was central to the apology
2000 Mules showed Andrews, his face blurred, depositing five ballots in a drop box in Lawrenceville, Georgia. The film’s narration called the conduct a crime and the ballots fraudulent.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
- Documentary film 2000 Mules Trump Card DVD
A Georgia state investigation found that Andrews was depositing ballots for himself, his wife, and their three adult children, who lived at the same address. Georgia law allowed this, and an investigator said there was no evidence of wrongdoing. AP covered the investigation and D’Souza’s apology; FactCheck.org also reviewed the footage and state findings.
What the admission does—and does not—establish
The specific admission is that the surveillance videos may not have been correlated with the geolocation data as the film’s presentation led viewers to believe. That undermines the link the film asserted between particular footage and location-based claims about repeated drop-box visits.
It should not be overstated as a wholesale retraction. AP reported that D’Souza continued to express confidence in True the Vote and in the film’s broader premise. Separately, AP characterized the film’s broader analysis as relying on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts, and improper analysis of cellphone location data. Those criticisms concern the wider case made by the film; they are distinct from D’Souza’s acknowledgment about matching videos to geolocation records.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How Salem Media’s action differed from D’Souza’s
Salem Media, the film’s publisher, acted before D’Souza issued his statement. In May 2024, Salem apologized to Andrews, said it had removed the film from its platforms, and said it would not further distribute the film or companion book. D’Souza made his own statement and apology in December 2024. The Associated Press report carried by KVIA describes Salem’s announcement.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
Rank #3
- Captivating Documentary: Immerse yourself in the gripping story of 2000 Mules, a thought-provoking film that delves into the alleged voter fraud during the 2020 US presidential election.
- Investigative Approach: Discover the meticulous research and analysis conducted by the filmmakers, shedding light on the purported ballot trafficking operations across multiple states.
- Controversial Perspective: Engage with a controversial viewpoint that challenges the widely accepted narrative surrounding the election's integrity, sparking discussions and debates.
- Compelling Evidence: Witness the presentation of video evidence, data analysis, and eyewitness accounts that aim to substantiate the claims made in the film.
- Timely and Relevant: Explore a topical and divisive issue that continues to shape political discourse and influence public opinion in the United States.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
