Andrew Lownie’s “lots more to come” comment was a forecast, not confirmation that a particular new disclosure existed. In a November 2025 essay, Dennis Altman quoted the biographer predicting that more damaging material about Andrew Mountbatten Windsor would emerge, and described the years of reporting behind Lownie’s unauthorised book, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York.
What did Andrew Lownie mean by “lots more to come”?
Altman attributed this prediction to Lownie: “I think there’s lots more still to come, lots more, and it will be even more damaging material.” Lownie was referring to continuing revelations about Andrew, formerly known as Prince Andrew. The remark expresses Lownie’s expectation; it does not identify a specific future disclosure or establish that one subsequently appeared.
The quotation appeared in Altman’s essay, republished by The New Indian Express and Scroll in November 2025. These publications carry substantially the same essay, so they should not be treated as independent confirmation of its claims.
What is Entitled about?
Lownie’s book is an unauthorised biography of Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, titled Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York. HarperCollins Australia lists the book and author, with ISBN 9780008775476. The publisher listing confirms the book’s identity, not the allegations discussed in Altman’s essay. View the HarperCollins Australia listing.
#1 Best Overall
- Orders are despatched from our UK warehouse next working day.
Altman frames the book around alleged entitlement, financial conduct, public duties and the couple’s association with Jeffrey Epstein. His essay also revisits Andrew’s 2019 BBC Newsnight interview and his former role as a UK trade envoy. These are the essay’s selected themes, not a substitute for an independent investigation of each claim.
Altman describes Lownie as a historian, journalist and literary agent who has written about royal scandals. He characterizes the book as a study of the rise and fall of Andrew and Ferguson, and quotes Lownie describing its story as “a tale of childhood trauma, infidelity, lust, betrayal, corruption, greed, extravagance, arrogance, entitlement, Establishment cover-up and hubris.” That is Lownie’s characterization as reported by Altman.
Rank #2
- LORENZ BOOKS
- brand: Lorenz Books
- manufacturer: Lorenz Books
What does Altman say about Lownie’s reporting?
Altman says Lownie spent years researching the book, spoke with 300 people with intimate knowledge of Andrew and Ferguson, and obtained access to National Archives files after a court order. Those details are reported by Altman; the essay does not provide independent verification of the interview count or archive access.
Altman also attributes a specific financial claim to Lownie: Ferguson was paid half a million dollars for five speeches in 2007, with the cost of moving an entourage of at least ten people across the Atlantic on top. This is a reported figure, not an independently corroborated statistic in the sources cited here.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Rank #3
How does the essay handle allegations involving Andrew?
Altman connects the book’s account to Andrew’s association with Epstein and to the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre. The essay says Andrew denied Giuffre’s account and discusses a settlement, contacts and business dealings. A denial, an allegation and a settlement are distinct things; the essay is commentary and does not supply court documents or official records that would establish the allegations as findings of fact. Claims about alleged deal-making or use of public position should likewise be read as claims discussed by Altman, not as proven misconduct.
Altman compares Lownie’s book with Nigel Cawthorne’s 2020 Prince Andrew: Epstein, Maxwell and the Palace, assessing Lownie’s as more up to date and perhaps less speculative. That is Altman’s judgment, not a systematic comparison or an independently verified assessment of either book’s sourcing.
Rank #4
What the prediction does—and does not—tell readers
Lownie’s forecast signals his expectation that scrutiny and disclosures would continue. On the evidence in Altman’s November 2025 essay, it does not establish what any later material contains, whether it has emerged, or whether it substantiates a particular allegation. The essay is useful as a report of Lownie’s view and a guide to the subjects Altman says the biography addresses; it is not independent confirmation of every claim it recounts.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.




