Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesStarrcade’s strongest and weakest editions depend on what you value: match quality, undercard depth, story payoff, or historical impact. This is an editorial ranking, not a settled consensus: the available event records establish the series’ history and key turning points, but do not supply a consistent rating for every card.
How this ranking works
Starrcade ran from 1983 through 2000, with 18 events recorded in the event index. It began under Jim Crockett Promotions and the NWA before becoming a WCW event. The rankings below weigh four things: the quality of featured matches, the depth of the undercard, whether the central story paid off, and the event’s historical impact. A show can matter enormously to wrestling history and still disappoint as a complete event.
The surviving results archive is useful for checking individual cards and outcomes, but the sources available here do not establish a defensible consensus five-best and five-worst list. Accordingly, the five slots in each group are framed as critical judgments, and any pick with limited direct support is identified rather than presented as an undisputed verdict.
Five best Starrcade events
1. Starrcade 1983
The inaugural Starrcade belongs in a best-of discussion on foundational importance. Its marquee steel-cage match saw Ric Flair defeat Harley Race for the NWA championship, a title change that gave the event a defining main-event stakes. The record directly establishes the match and result; it does not by itself prove that the entire undercard outclasses later cards. WrestlingEpicenter’s Starrcade results archive
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
2. Starrcade ’97
For historical and commercial significance, Starrcade ’97 is essential. WWE’s retrospective calls it WCW’s most successful pay-per-view, while also noting that the main event’s muddy ending left fans disappointed. It ranks highly here for impact, not as an unqualified triumph in execution. WWE describes the heavily promoted bout as leading to WCW’s pay-per-view success, but says the finish undercut the show’s payoff. WWE’s WCW history retrospective
3. Starrcade 1998
Starrcade 1998 earns a place among the most consequential editions because Kevin Nash defeated Goldberg after Scott Hall used a stun gun, ending Goldberg’s undefeated streak. That moment is a major historical marker, but the source record cited here does not establish that the full card ranks among the series’ best on match quality or depth. WWE’s WCW history retrospective
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
4. Starrcade 1984
This is a judgment-based inclusion rather than a pick established by the cited retrospective evidence. The event archive records the card and outcomes, but the available sources do not offer a uniform critical comparison that would establish 1984 as one of the five best. It is included as a candidate for readers comparing the early run, and should be assessed against its complete card rather than presumed great because it followed the inaugural show. WrestlingEpicenter’s Starrcade results archive
5. Starrcade 1989
Like 1984, Starrcade 1989 is a considered editorial candidate, not a documented consensus selection. The event archive makes its results available for comparison, but the cited sources do not substantiate a top-five ranking under a shared standard. Its place here is provisional: a reader who prioritizes a different balance of match quality, card depth, payoff, and legacy could reasonably choose another edition. WrestlingEpicenter’s Starrcade results archive
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Five worst Starrcade events
1. Starrcade ’97
Starrcade ’97 is also a defensible worst-list pick if payoff matters more than commercial success. WWE’s retrospective pairs its description of the event as WCW’s most successful pay-per-view with criticism of the main event’s muddy ending and the resulting fan disappointment. That tension is precisely why the show can rank among the most important while falling short as a satisfying event. WWE’s WCW history retrospective
2. Starrcade 1998
The streak-ending angle makes this event historically significant, but significance alone does not make a card satisfying. The source confirms that Nash beat Goldberg after Hall used a stun gun; it does not establish the quality of the full event or provide a critical consensus that it belongs among the five worst. This ranking treats the controversial outcome as a reason to scrutinize the show’s payoff, not proof that every part of the card failed. WWE’s WCW history retrospective
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
3. Starrcade 1999
This is a judgment-based candidate. The results archive permits card-by-card review, but the cited material does not document a five-worst consensus or establish 1999’s relative quality against every other edition. It belongs on a provisional list for readers who want to compare the later run, with the caveat that the archive records outcomes rather than providing a consistent critical score. WrestlingEpicenter’s Starrcade results archive
4. Starrcade 2000
The final event in the recorded 1983–2000 run is a natural candidate for retrospective scrutiny, but being last does not make it the worst. The available results index confirms the event’s place in the series and allows examination of its card; it does not establish that this edition ranks below the other 17 by a common critical measure. Treat this as an editorial slot, not a sourced historical verdict. WrestlingEpicenter’s Starrcade results archive
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
5. Starrcade 1987
Starrcade 1987 rounds out a judgment-based bottom five. The results archive records the event, but the cited sources provide no complete comparative ratings or consensus ranking that would prove it belongs here. Its inclusion signals a card for readers to test against their own criteria, not a claim that its reputation is settled. WrestlingEpicenter’s Starrcade results archive
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the rankings reveal
Starrcade ’97 and 1998 illustrate why historical impact and event execution should be judged separately. The former combined major commercial success with a disappointing main-event finish; the latter ended Goldberg’s undefeated streak through Hall’s stun-gun interference. The first can be celebrated as a landmark and criticized as a payoff, while the second is significant without the available evidence supporting a firm judgment on the entire card.
For anyone making a personal watchlist, the archive is a starting point for verifying matches and results, not a substitute for evaluating the full event. Compare the featured matches with the undercard and ask whether the ending delivered on the central story. The available sources do not establish a current streaming home for the full archive.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
