Peacock’s Those About to Die drops viewers headfirst into the blood-soaked spectacle of Ancient Rome, where political ambition, public entertainment, and personal survival collide inside the Colosseum. Set during the reign of the Flavian dynasty, the series frames Rome not as a distant marble postcard, but as a living machine powered by violence, money, and mass distraction. It’s a world where emperors rise and fall, gladiators become disposable celebrities, and the crowd’s appetite dictates fate.
At its core, the series is as much about power as it is about combat, weaving together multiple storylines that span the imperial palace, the betting pits, and the brutal training grounds of Rome’s fighters. Gladiatorial games serve as the public face of the empire, but behind them lies a ruthless ecosystem of politicians, fixers, slave traders, and would-be legends all vying for advantage. This layered approach allows the show to explore Roman society from the ground up, balancing historical texture with modern, character-driven storytelling.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Those About to Die | $11.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
A Night to Die For | $7.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Die-Sire Prestige Say It In Style Die-Always With You | $35.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Troy | Buy on Amazon | |
| 5 |
|
300 | Buy on Amazon |
Anchoring this world is a sprawling international cast that blends veteran screen presence with emerging talent, each actor embodying a different facet of Rome’s hierarchy. From calculating emperors and scheming nobles to hardened gladiators and those forced to profit from their suffering, the ensemble gives the series its weight and urgency. As the cast breaks down their roles, it becomes clear that Those About to Die isn’t just recreating history; it’s dramatizing how spectacle, fame, and survival have always gone hand in hand.
Power at the Pinnacle: Anthony Hopkins and the Imperial Court of Rome
If the Colosseum is the engine of Those About to Die, the imperial court is its control room, where bloodshed is calculated, leveraged, and sold to the masses. Power here isn’t abstract or ceremonial; it’s transactional, constantly negotiated through spectacle, loyalty, and fear. At the center of it all stands an emperor who understands that survival depends on keeping Rome entertained.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
Anthony Hopkins as Emperor Vespasian
Anthony Hopkins brings immense gravity to Emperor Vespasian, the hardened founder of the Flavian dynasty who rules with pragmatism rather than idealism. Far removed from the romanticized Caesars of pop culture, Hopkins plays Vespasian as a shrewd survivor shaped by civil war, financial ruin, and political compromise. His performance emphasizes exhaustion and calculation, portraying an emperor who views the gladiatorial games not as indulgence, but as necessary infrastructure for social control. It’s a role that taps into Hopkins’ mastery of authority figures, echoing past turns defined by restraint, menace, and intelligence.
Titus: The Heir Caught Between Duty and Legacy
As Vespasian’s favored son, Titus represents continuity, but also uncertainty, within the imperial household. Played by Tom Hughes, the character balances military credibility with political ambition, positioning him as Rome’s most viable future ruler. Hughes infuses Titus with a mix of confidence and moral tension, suggesting a man aware of the cost of empire even as he prepares to inherit it. His presence highlights the generational pressures that come with ruling a city fueled by spectacle and unrest.
Domitian and the Volatility of Ambition
In sharp contrast stands Domitian, portrayed by Jojo Macari, whose hunger for recognition makes him one of the court’s most dangerous variables. Overshadowed by his brother and underestimated by his father, Domitian’s volatility simmers beneath a carefully maintained façade. Macari leans into the character’s insecurity and ambition, offering a portrait of a man desperate to be seen in a system that rewards cruelty and cunning. Within the series, Domitian becomes a reminder that Rome’s greatest threats often emerge from within its own ruling family.
Together, the imperial cast transforms the palace into a pressure cooker where personal rivalries carry empire-wide consequences. Through these performances, Those About to Die makes clear that the violence of the arena begins long before the gates open, shaped by decisions made in marble halls by men who understand that in Rome, power is only as strong as the spectacle that sustains it.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Masters of the Masses: Politicians, Power Brokers, and the Machinery of Spectacle
Beyond the imperial family, Those About to Die widens its lens to the operators who actually keep Rome’s entertainment economy running. These figures rarely wear crowns, but they understand the crowd better than any emperor, manipulating hunger, loyalty, and outrage through blood sport and gambling. The series treats politics and spectacle as inseparable industries, powered by men and women who profit from chaos while pretending to serve the public good.
Tenax: The Kingmaker of the Crowd
At the center of this shadow economy is Tenax, played with ferocious charisma by Iwan Rheon. A former slave turned gambling magnate, Tenax controls the betting markets, the chariot factions, and, by extension, the emotions of Rome’s masses. Rheon, best known for his chilling turn as Ramsay Bolton on Game of Thrones, brings a sharper, more calculating energy here, crafting a character who understands that influence is more valuable than titles.
Tenax operates beneath the notice of emperors while quietly shaping outcomes that ripple upward into politics. His storyline exposes how deeply Rome’s leadership depends on figures they publicly disdain but privately rely upon. In Those About to Die, Tenax becomes the embodiment of capitalism before conscience, where survival hinges on reading the crowd faster than anyone else.
Marsus and the Senate’s Fading Authority
Rupert Penry-Jones portrays Marsus, a patrician senator struggling to maintain relevance in a Rome increasingly ruled by spectacle rather than statesmanship. Marsus represents the old guard, men who believe lineage and rhetoric should still command respect, even as the mob’s appetite grows more influential than law. Penry-Jones plays him with weary arrogance, capturing a class that senses its grip slipping but refuses to adapt.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Through Marsus, the series illustrates how political power fractures when public entertainment becomes the primary currency of control. His interactions with both the imperial family and figures like Tenax reveal a Senate caught between moral posturing and practical compromise. It’s a nuanced performance that frames Rome’s decline not as a sudden collapse, but as a slow surrender to crowd psychology.
Cala and the Business of Blood
Sara Martins brings steel and intelligence to Cala, a North African entrepreneur navigating Rome’s brutal entertainment markets. Cala is not a senator or noble, but she understands supply chains, contracts, and leverage better than most men in power. Martins, known for her work on Death in Paradise, gives the character a grounded authority that cuts through the show’s excess.
Cala’s presence underscores how Rome’s spectacle machine extends far beyond the arena floor. She deals in fighters, logistics, and alliances, proving that commerce, not honor, sustains the games. In a society obsessed with domination, Cala survives by mastering the economics behind the violence.
The System Behind the Screams
Together, these characters reveal the true architecture of Roman control. Emperors may decree, but it’s bookmakers, senators, and merchants who calibrate the emotional temperature of the city. Those About to Die frames spectacle as a weaponized system, one that requires constant negotiation between politics, profit, and public perception.
Rank #2
By giving these power brokers narrative weight, the series deepens its portrayal of Rome as a living organism fueled by entertainment. The result is a world where every cheer has a price, every riot a sponsor, and every ruler, no matter how mighty, is ultimately beholden to the machinery that keeps the masses watching.
Blood, Sweat, and Sand: The Gladiators Who Drive the Series’ Emotional Core
If senators and schemers explain how Rome functions, the gladiators show what that system costs. Those About to Die never treats the arena as background spectacle. The fighters are the emotional ballast of the series, grounding its political excess in flesh, fear, and survival.
These men are not symbols of honor so much as commodities, bodies shaped by ownership contracts and crowd expectations. By spending time inside their routines, rivalries, and private moments of dread, the series reframes gladiatorial combat as labor performed under the most lethal conditions imaginable.
Scorpus and the Cult of the Crowd
Dimitri Leonidas delivers one of the show’s most electric performances as Scorpus, a legendary charioteer whose fame rivals that of emperors. While not a gladiator in the strictest sense, Scorpus occupies the same brutal ecosystem, living and dying by public adoration. Leonidas, previously seen in American Gods, plays him with volatile charisma, capturing both the thrill of celebrity and its suffocating pressure.
Scorpus represents the apex of Rome’s entertainment machine, where victory translates into wealth and influence, but failure invites instant abandonment. His storyline highlights how performers in ancient Rome could become idols without ever becoming free. The cheers that lift him up are the same ones waiting to tear him apart.
The Fighters Beneath the Sands
Beyond marquee names, Those About to Die invests heavily in its ensemble of gladiators, many portrayed by emerging or international actors whose relative anonymity enhances the realism. These fighters are introduced not as legends, but as property: captured soldiers, enslaved men, and debtors reshaped into marketable violence. Their physicality feels earned, with performances that emphasize exhaustion, pain, and tactical desperation rather than heroic posturing.
The show lingers on training yards, medical tents, and holding cells, making clear that the arena is only the final stop in a long cycle of exploitation. Small gestures, shared meals, exchanged looks before combat, carry as much emotional weight as the fights themselves. It’s in these quiet moments that the series finds its humanity.
Brotherhood, Rivalry, and Manufactured Myth
What binds the gladiators together is not loyalty to Rome, but to each other. Temporary brotherhoods form out of necessity, often dissolving the moment matchups are announced. The series smartly avoids romanticizing this bond, showing how friendship and rivalry coexist when survival demands both cooperation and competition.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchArena promoters and owners actively cultivate grudges and narratives, turning personal histories into selling points. The fighters are encouraged to become characters as much as combatants, performing identities crafted for maximum crowd engagement. In doing so, Those About to Die exposes how mythmaking becomes another weapon used against the men forced to embody it.
Women in the Empire: Noblewomen, Survivors, and Strategists Behind the Throne
While Those About to Die revels in masculine spectacle, its vision of Rome would collapse without the women operating just outside the spotlight. The series gives its female characters agency within a system designed to deny it, portraying them as political actors, survivors, and cultural power brokers. Their influence is rarely public, but it is constant, shaping outcomes in corridors where swords are useless.
Rather than treating women as ornaments to male ambition, the show frames them as forces navigating a violent hierarchy with intelligence and restraint. Every choice carries risk, and survival often depends on reading power before it announces itself.
Cala and the Power of Outsiders
Sara Martins delivers one of the series’ most compelling performances as Cala, a Numidian woman caught between enslavement and insurgency. Known for her work on Death in Paradise, Martins brings quiet authority to a character who understands Rome precisely because she stands outside it. Cala’s arc exposes the empire’s blind spot: its belief that power only moves through official channels.
Operating in markets, back rooms, and borderlands, Cala uses information as currency. Her survival depends not on brute force, but on adaptability, timing, and emotional intelligence. Through her, the series broadens its scope beyond Rome’s elite, showing how imperial cruelty radiates outward and breeds resistance in unexpected places.
Antonia and the Cost of Imperial Marriage
As Antonia, Domitian’s wife, Gabriella Pession embodies the suffocating reality of noblewomanhood under the Flavian dynasty. Pession, known for Italian prestige television and international productions like Crossing Lines, plays Antonia as observant and restrained, a woman who understands that visibility can be as dangerous as irrelevance. Her position offers proximity to power, but no protection from it.
Antonia’s storyline underscores how marriage in imperial Rome functions as both alliance and imprisonment. Her calculated silences and carefully chosen words reveal a character constantly assessing threats, even within her own household. In a court defined by paranoia, Antonia survives by mastering emotional containment.
Berenice and the Politics of Desire
Lara Wolf’s Berenice introduces a different kind of influence: one rooted in intimacy rather than lineage. Historically linked to Titus, Berenice represents Rome’s discomfort with foreign queens and autonomous women. Wolf plays her with warmth and intelligence, making clear why her presence unsettles the imperial court.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsBerenice’s relationship with Titus is not framed as scandal alone, but as a political liability in a city obsessed with appearances. Her outsider status mirrors Rome’s broader fear of women who cannot be easily categorized or controlled. Through Berenice, the series explores how affection becomes a battleground when empire and image collide.
Women as the Empire’s Silent Architects
Across social classes, Those About to Die presents women as navigators of consequence rather than spectators of history. Whether enslaved, married into power, or positioned as diplomatic liabilities, they exert influence through patience, memory, and perception. Their victories are rarely celebrated, but they are no less decisive.
By weaving these characters into its broader political tapestry, the series acknowledges a truth often ignored in historical epics. Rome’s empire was not sustained by emperors and armies alone, but by women who learned how to survive inside its contradictions.
Rivalries and Rebellion: Supporting Characters Who Shape Rome’s Fate
If emperors and heirs represent Rome’s visible hierarchy, Those About to Die is equally invested in the volatile forces operating beneath it. Gladiators, schemers, crime bosses, and political operators create the friction that keeps the empire unstable. These supporting characters give the series its pulse, embodying the chaos Rome attempts, and often fails, to control.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Tenax and the Economics of Bloodsport
Iwan Rheon’s Tenax is one of the series’ most compelling inventions, a ruthless entrepreneur who understands that Rome runs not only on power, but on spectacle. Formerly enslaved and now a dominant figure in the underworld of chariot racing and gladiatorial promotion, Tenax treats violence as currency. Rheon, best known for Game of Thrones and Misfits, plays him with coiled menace and sharp intelligence.
Tenax’s rivalry with the established elite exposes the fragile boundary between respectability and criminality in imperial Rome. He is not rebelling against the system so much as exploiting its hypocrisies, revealing how profit and brutality intertwine. Through Tenax, the show interrogates who truly controls the masses: emperors, or those who feed their appetite for blood.
Gladiators as Symbols of Defiance
The arena’s fighters are more than disposable bodies, and the series gives them a narrative weight often denied in historical epics. Dimitri Leonidas’ Scorpus emerges as a breakout presence, blending athletic ferocity with emotional restraint. His growing reputation inside the arena mirrors the political rise-and-fall cycle of Rome itself.
Scorpus and his rivals embody a paradox at the heart of Roman entertainment. They are enslaved yet celebrated, feared yet owned. Their personal rivalries become microcosms of imperial conflict, reminding viewers that rebellion does not always wear the face of revolution; sometimes it survives through endurance and reputation.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #4
Cala and the Politics of Survival
Sara Martins brings layered intensity to Cala, a character whose personal vendettas intersect with Rome’s larger power struggles. Neither noble nor powerless, Cala occupies a liminal space where survival depends on adaptability. Martins, known for Death in Paradise, infuses the role with emotional urgency and strategic cunning.
Cala’s arc underscores how rebellion often begins as self-preservation. Her alliances shift, her loyalties are tested, and her choices ripple outward in unexpected ways. In a city defined by rigid class structures, Cala represents the danger of underestimating those forced to live between worlds.
Rival Power Brokers and the Illusion of Order
Beyond the palace and the arena, Those About to Die populates Rome with senators, financiers, and fixers whose rivalries quietly destabilize the state. These figures rarely draw swords, but their conflicts are no less lethal. Influence, information, and access become weapons wielded in shadowed corridors.
The strength of the ensemble lies in how these characters intersect rather than exist in isolation. Personal grudges ignite political consequences, and private ambitions spill into public catastrophe. By giving weight to these supporting roles, the series presents Rome not as a monolith, but as a volatile ecosystem where even minor players can alter history’s trajectory.
From Prestige Drama to Epic Action: Notable Actors, Breakout Performances, and Career Context
Those About to Die thrives on the collision between seasoned prestige performers and physically demanding breakout roles. The casting strategy mirrors the series’ thematic tension, pairing imperial authority with raw survivalism. Each performance feels calibrated to reflect Rome’s brutal hierarchy, where legacy, violence, and spectacle are inseparable.
Anthony Hopkins and the Weight of Empire
Anthony Hopkins anchors the series as Emperor Vespasian, bringing with him decades of gravitas earned through roles in The Father, Westworld, and countless cinematic landmarks. His Vespasian is not the operatic tyrant audiences might expect, but a weary architect of stability, aware that peace in Rome is maintained through blood and distraction. Hopkins plays the emperor as a man calculating his own obsolescence, lending the role a somber inevitability.
The performance reframes Vespasian as a transitional figure, less concerned with glory than with control. That restraint allows the chaos around him to feel more volatile. In a show fueled by spectacle, Hopkins’ stillness becomes its own form of dominance.
Iwan Rheon’s Tenax and the Business of Blood
Iwan Rheon sheds the overt sadism of his Game of Thrones persona to portray Tenax, a shadowy power broker who understands Rome’s appetite better than anyone. As a fixer operating between aristocrats, gamblers, and arena owners, Tenax represents the commodification of violence. Rheon plays him with sharp intelligence and coiled menace, making every negotiation feel like a potential execution.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Tenax is fictional, but his function is historically resonant. He embodies the entrepreneurial machinery behind the games, reminding viewers that spectacle has always been a business. Rheon’s performance ensures the character never fades into abstraction, grounding the economics of cruelty in human ambition.
Imperial Heirs and the Fragility of Succession
Tom Hughes and Jojo Macari bring volatile energy to Titus and Domitian, sons locked in a struggle over Rome’s future. Hughes, known for Victoria, portrays Titus as a battle-hardened heir burdened by responsibility and expectation. His presence carries the exhaustion of conquest, suggesting a ruler shaped more by war than politics.
Macari’s Domitian, by contrast, seethes with insecurity and entitlement. His performance captures the resentment of a man born into power but denied legitimacy. Together, the brothers transform succession into a psychological battlefield, foreshadowing the instability that will define Rome’s imperial legacy.
Gladiators, Outsiders, and Physical Storytelling
Beyond Scorpus, the gladiatorial ensemble reinforces the series’ commitment to embodied performance. Fighters like Kwame, portrayed by Moe Hashim, represent Rome’s global reach and the human cost of its expansion. Hashim brings quiet dignity to a role defined by displacement, allowing physical endurance to speak louder than dialogue.
Best Value
These performances lean into movement, injury, and ritual. The actors’ physicality becomes narrative shorthand, conveying status and fate through posture and scars. In doing so, the show honors the arena as both stage and prison.
Women Navigating Power Without Protection
Sara Martins’ Cala is complemented by Gabriella Pession’s Antonia, a patrician woman wielding influence through lineage, alliances, and carefully masked intent. Pession, known for Crossing Lines, plays Antonia with aristocratic precision, revealing how privilege in Rome still comes with vulnerability. Her power depends on timing and proximity, not force.
Together, these characters expand the series’ political lens. They expose how women survive and manipulate systems designed to exclude them, reinforcing the idea that Rome’s most dangerous battles are often fought far from the arena’s roar.
Why This Ensemble Works: How the Cast Brings Scale, Violence, and Humanity to Ancient Rome
What ultimately sets Those About to Die apart is how its cast operates as a living ecosystem rather than a collection of star turns. The series demands actors who can sell both the immensity of imperial Rome and the intimate costs of surviving within it. This ensemble understands that spectacle only matters when it is tethered to human consequence.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallAnchoring the Empire With Authority and Decay
At the top of the hierarchy, Anthony Hopkins’ Vespasian provides the gravitational center. Hopkins plays the emperor not as a mythic tyrant but as a calculating survivor, a man keenly aware that Rome is always one succession crisis away from chaos. His restrained performance grounds the series, reminding viewers that even absolute power is temporary.
That sense of decay radiates outward. Every scene involving the imperial family carries the weight of collapse, with performances calibrated to suggest rot beneath ritual. The cast collectively reinforces the idea that Rome’s grandeur is inseparable from its anxiety.
Violence as Character, Not Just Spectacle
The show’s brutality works because the actors treat violence as lived experience rather than shock value. Dimitri Leonidas’ Scorpus embodies this approach, turning chariot racing into a study of obsession, ego, and expendability. His physical commitment makes each race feel like a negotiation with death, not a victory lap.
Across the gladiatorial ranks, performers like Moe Hashim inject individuality into roles defined by survival. These characters fight not for glory but for time, and the cast communicates that desperation through battered bodies and measured silences. Violence becomes a language, one the ensemble speaks fluently.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsHuman Stakes in a System Built to Consume
What gives the series its emotional punch is how consistently the cast locates humanity within oppressive systems. Whether it’s Sara Martins’ Cala navigating enslavement or Gabriella Pession’s Antonia maneuvering within elite politics, the performances emphasize adaptation over idealism. Survival in Rome is never clean, and the actors never pretend otherwise.
Even secondary characters are allowed moments of interiority. A glance, a hesitation, or a calculated smile often reveals more than dialogue, reinforcing the idea that everyone in this world is negotiating power on unequal terms.
A Cohesive Ensemble That Reflects Rome Itself
The brilliance of this casting lies in its cohesion. Veterans and rising talents alike commit to the same tonal register, ensuring that palace intrigue, street-level desperation, and arena carnage feel interconnected. No performance exists in isolation, mirroring how Rome itself functions as an interdependent, brutal machine.
In the end, Those About to Die succeeds because its cast understands the assignment: make Rome feel vast, merciless, and achingly human all at once. By blending scale with intimacy and violence with vulnerability, this ensemble transforms historical spectacle into a lived-in world, one that lingers long after the blood dries in the sand.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.




