The “secret backstory” is Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.’s interpretation of the creature for his 2011 prequel—not a definitive origin established by John Carpenter’s 1982 film. Van Heijningen imagined the Thing as a virus with no original form, possibly using the frozen creature as a host. A more explicit explanation involving a specimen-collecting spaceship was considered for an early script, then dropped.
What was the Thing’s secret backstory?
Van Heijningen Jr. described his interpretation in a 2011 interview about the prequel’s development: “In my opinion it was always sort of a virus, it doesn’t have an original form.” In this view, the Thing is not necessarily the recognizable creature discovered in the ice. It may have taken over that creature, using it as a host.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Thing (2011) [Blu-ray] | $7.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
The Thing (2011) [Blu-ray] | $13.95 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
The Thing (2011) [Blu-ray] | $38.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
The Thing (2011) Blu-ray Steelbook (French Import) [REGION FREE] | Buy on Amazon | |
| 5 |
|
The Thing (2011) [Blu-ray] | $24.49 | Buy on Amazon |
The qualification matters: this was the director’s view of the alien, not a complete fictional chronology confirmed by the finished films. The interview does not establish what the Thing originally was, where it began, or exactly how it reached Earth.
Was the crashed spaceship a specimen-collecting lab?
Van Heijningen said the filmmakers considered a more explicit origin in an early version of the prequel’s script. In that idea, the ship was a “big biolab,” and its crew were specimen collectors. He recalled: “We had, at some point, that they would go inside of the ship, in the beginning of the movie, and they would see that the ship was this big biolab and that they were specimen collectors that race, and it broke free and killed everyone in the ship.”
#1 Best Overall
That scenario was abandoned. Van Heijningen said it made the spaceship too central and weakened the story’s focus on the Thing found frozen in the ice. It is development history, not the finished film’s confirmed explanation—and it should not be presented as canon in Carpenter’s 1982 movie.
How does that fit John Carpenter’s 1982 film?
Carpenter’s film, released June 25, 1982, credits Bill Lancaster as screenwriter and identifies John W. Campbell Jr.’s Who Goes There? as its source. Its central idea is imitation, not a detailed account of the alien’s beginnings. Carpenter put it this way: “We went back to the origin of the story, which is the imitation. It wasn’t a big Frankenstein monster, it was a creature that can imitate other life-forms perfectly.” He also said, “Well, the Thing can look like anything.”
Rank #2
The films therefore leave different kinds of information in view: Carpenter’s film foregrounds a creature that can imitate life, while Van Heijningen’s interview reveals an interpretation he brought to the prequel and a ship-origin idea the filmmakers later discarded. The AFI Catalog likewise records Carpenter’s comments about how difficult the creature is to describe because it changes and can be anything.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Does this reveal who is the Thing at the end?
No. The creature’s origin and the final identity mystery are separate questions. A SYFY Wire oral history updated September 23, 2024, reports that Carpenter knows who is the Thing at the end of his film but has declined to disclose the answer. That unresolved ending does not confirm or disprove Van Heijningen’s origin interpretation.
Recommended Free Tools
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #3
- Blu-ray
- Multiple Formats, Blu-ray, AC-3
- French (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled), Spanish (Dubbed)
- 2
- 206
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.




