Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsTo Kill A Nazi presents Michel Cojot as a son driven by the murder of his father to pursue Nazi criminal Klaus Barbie, then as a man whose story becomes entangled with the 1976 Entebbe rescue. The historical record supports key surrounding events—Barbie’s crimes and escape to South America, and the hijacking and rescue at Entebbe—but the sources available do not independently verify every episode attributed to Cojot or establish exactly what he contributed to the raid. The distinction matters: the film’s personal narrative is not the same thing as corroborated historical evidence.
Which version of the documentary is being discussed?
The current film is To Kill A Nazi, written, directed, and produced by Boaz Dvir. Its official website describes Cojot as a French businessman who discovers that his father, Joseph Goldberg, was murdered at Auschwitz. The synopsis says that he recognizes Barbie’s signature on arrest paperwork, travels to Bolivia posing as a journalist, and hesitates to shoot Barbie when he encounters him. It then connects Cojot’s later experience at Entebbe with a chance for redemption. Those are the filmmakers’ stated narrative claims and framing; the synopsis is not, by itself, independent proof of each event. The film’s official synopsis and credits identify the current project.
Version matters because the project circulated under earlier names. Penn State materials call it Cojot; a 2016 announcement used Cojot: A Second Chance Comes Only Once. A University of Florida event postcard from 2018 described an earlier project about Cojot-Goldberg as a Nazi hunter, an Entebbe hostage, and a witness at Barbie’s trial, using footage, archival documents, interviews, and animation. Those descriptions can help explain the project’s development, but they should not be treated as a scene-by-scene account of the current cut. See the Penn State preview of the earlier project, its 2016 title announcement, and the University of Florida event postcard.
The Haifa International Film Festival’s 2026 listing identifies the film as a 101-minute U.S. documentary in English and French with Hebrew subtitles. The distributor, Go2Films, also lists the documentary and its production credits. These details identify a particular contemporary version and screening context; they do not independently verify the personal events in its synopsis. Consult the Haifa festival listing and Go2Films listing when distinguishing the current film from older project descriptions.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
What the film’s portrayal emphasizes
The synopsis gives the story a clear dramatic arc: a family loss leads to a pursuit of Barbie; the pursuit reaches a moment of moral hesitation; and a later connection to Entebbe offers a possibility of redemption. That structure makes Cojot the personal link between two different histories—the persecution of Jews and resistance fighters under Nazi rule, and the 1976 hostage crisis in Uganda. It invites viewers to consider what justice means when a person seeks to confront a perpetrator directly, and whether later actions can alter the meaning of an earlier choice.
This is a description of the film’s framing, not a conclusion that its episodes happened exactly as presented. A documentary can use interviews, archival material, animation, or dramatic sequencing to make a story intelligible; none of those forms automatically proves a claim. The earlier University of Florida description, for example, mentions several kinds of material, but it refers to an earlier project. Without a detailed account of the current cut’s sources for each episode, viewers should not infer that every narrated moment is independently corroborated.
The most important distinction is between historical context and Cojot-specific action. Evidence that Barbie was a war criminal does not establish that Cojot found him in Bolivia. Evidence that an Israeli operation rescued hostages at Entebbe does not show that Cojot supplied intelligence used in its planning. The film may present such actions as part of its story, but a comparison with historical accounts has to ask what separate records establish about each claim.
The narrative also places different kinds of claims side by side. A family history, a claimed face-to-face encounter, and a contribution to a military operation do not have the same evidentiary threshold. For the first, useful corroboration might include personal papers or family testimony. For the encounter, a contemporaneous account or independent witness would matter. For an intelligence contribution, the key questions are what information was supplied, when it reached decision-makers, and whether an operational record or first-hand testimony connects it to planning. The film’s emotional continuity between these episodes is not itself proof of a historical chain between them.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
What the historical record establishes about Klaus Barbie
The U.S. National Archives’ analysis of the Klaus Barbie file supplies substantial context for the film’s portrayal of Barbie as a Nazi criminal. It describes Barbie’s involvement in atrocities against members of the French Resistance and Jews, including the April 1944 deportation order for Jewish children from the Izieu orphanage. It also documents a postwar relationship with U.S. intelligence and assistance that enabled Barbie to leave Europe for South America in 1951. The analysis is dated September 19, 2001, and is available in the National Archives’ account of the Barbie file.
This archival account supports two major parts of the background: Barbie’s crimes and his postwar presence in South America. It gives viewers a historically grounded reason the film’s pursuit narrative carries moral weight. It does not, however, document the specific encounter the film describes between Cojot and Barbie in Bolivia. The archive’s account of Barbie’s route out of Europe is not evidence that a particular civilian located or confronted him later.
That limit is not a minor technicality. A narrative can be accurate about the criminal’s history while leaving an individual’s claimed role unverified. When assessing the film, it is therefore sound to say that the broad historical portrait of Barbie’s crimes and escape is supported by archival analysis, while keeping the alleged Cojot encounter in a separate evidentiary category.
What official records establish about Entebbe
The Israel Ministry of Defense Archives describes the hijacking of an Air France aircraft by Palestinian hijackers on June 26, 1976, its landing in Uganda, and the detention of hostages there. Its page presents an official debriefing and an operation log for the Israeli rescue. This material supports the broad outline and setting of the raid, as documented in the Ministry of Defense Archives’ Operation Entebbe account.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
The official archive page does not establish the film’s claim about Cojot’s specific actions or his contribution to Israeli planning. A documented rescue operation and a documented role for one person are separate claims requiring separate evidence. The existence of an operational log does not mean it records every source of information or every person connected to planning; conversely, a film’s account of a contribution cannot be treated as confirmed simply because the raid itself is well documented.
For that reason, the careful comparison is narrow: the historical setting and general rescue are supported by an official Israeli archive, while the available material does not specify what information Cojot allegedly provided or demonstrate how it affected the operation. Claims about his part should be attributed to the film unless supported by testimony, personal papers, trial records, or operational documents that directly address it.
When considering any account of his role, separate three questions that can easily be collapsed into one: Was Cojot connected to the events at Entebbe? Did he provide information before the rescue? And did that information influence Israeli planning? The film’s framing links his experience to the raid, but the cited official archive establishes the operation’s broad history rather than answering those individual questions. A source that confirms presence or participation would not automatically prove that intelligence was used; evidence of a contribution would need to identify what was shared and how it mattered.
How to judge the claims about Cojot himself
The central unresolved question is not whether Barbie committed crimes or whether the Entebbe rescue took place. It is whether independent evidence confirms the particular episodes that make Cojot the connecting figure in the film. The current film website and listings provide the story as the filmmakers present it. The historical materials described above establish context but do not independently confirm the reported Bolivia encounter or precisely substantiate Cojot’s alleged intelligence contribution.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
That does not prove those personal episodes are false. It means the sources available here do not settle them. Historical caution works in both directions: do not promote an uncorroborated film claim into an established fact, but do not turn an absence of confirmation in these sources into proof that it never happened. The appropriate wording is that the film portrays or says Cojot did something, while independent corroboration has not been established by the cited archival accounts.
A stronger historical assessment would need evidence that directly bears on the individual claim: for example, a contemporaneous record, testimony from a person with first-hand knowledge, Cojot’s personal papers, trial documentation, or operational records identifying the information and its use. General records about Barbie or Entebbe cannot substitute for that link. If such material is cited in a particular screening or edition, assess what it actually documents—an encounter, a statement made afterward, or a demonstrable role in planning—rather than treating all three as interchangeable.
- For Barbie’s crimes and postwar escape: the National Archives analysis supports the broader historical context.
- For the hijacking and rescue: the Israeli archive supports the broad operation history.
- For Cojot’s reported encounter and role: the film’s portrayal is identifiable, but the cited historical accounts do not independently confirm the details.
A useful review can therefore make a claim-by-claim comparison rather than delivering a single all-or-nothing verdict on accuracy. First, compare the film’s account of Barbie’s crimes and escape with the National Archives’ analysis. Next, distinguish the current film’s account of Cojot from earlier descriptions under Cojot and Cojot: A Second Chance Comes Only Once. Finally, compare the film’s account of his Entebbe connection with the official operation history, while noting whether a source actually identifies his information or its use. This method preserves what the records support without treating a promotional synopsis or an earlier project description as independent confirmation.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Bottom line: the film’s story and the documented history are not identical
To Kill A Nazi turns Cojot’s pursuit of Barbie into a personal story that culminates in an Entebbe connection. The documentary’s framing can be described confidently as the film’s own account. The wider historical foundations—Barbie’s atrocities and escape to South America, and the 1976 hijacking and Israeli rescue—have support in archival sources. The specific story of Cojot’s encounter in Bolivia and exactly what he contributed before the raid remain unconfirmed by those sources. The fairest verdict is therefore mixed: the film is grounded in real historical events, but its central character’s most consequential personal actions should be attributed to the documentary rather than stated as independently established fact.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
Frequently Asked Questions
How accurate is *To Kill A Nazi* about Michel Cojot?
The film’s broad historical setting is supported: the National Archives documents Klaus Barbie’s crimes and postwar escape to South America, and the Israel Ministry of Defense Archives documents the 1976 hijacking and rescue at Entebbe. Those records do not independently confirm every Cojot-specific episode in the film, including the reported Bolivia encounter or the precise nature of his contribution to Israeli planning.
Did Michel Cojot really track down Klaus Barbie in Bolivia?
The current film synopsis says Cojot travelled to Bolivia posing as a journalist and encountered Barbie. The cited National Archives account supports Barbie’s presence in South America but does not verify that Cojot found or confronted him. On these sources alone, describe the encounter as the film’s account, not as an independently established fact.
What was Michel Cojot’s role in the Entebbe raid?
The film connects Cojot’s story to the Entebbe rescue, but the official Israeli archive account cited here establishes the operation’s broad history rather than specifying what information Cojot supplied or how it affected planning. Confirming such a role would require direct testimony or records that identify the information and its use.
Why do some sources call the film *Cojot*?
The documentary project circulated under earlier titles, including *Cojot* and *Cojot: A Second Chance Comes Only Once*. The current film website calls the feature *To Kill A Nazi*. Older festival or university descriptions concern earlier versions and should not automatically be treated as descriptions of the current cut.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
The Bottom Line
The documentary presents Cojot’s pursuit of Barbie and Entebbe connection as a dramatic personal arc. Archival sources support the surrounding history, but do not independently establish the reported Bolivia encounter or exactly what Cojot contributed to the raid. Attribute those personal claims to the film unless direct corroboration is available.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
