Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
There is no official answer to “What is the worst Pokémon from each generation?” This is one editorial ranking of a weakest pick from each numbered mainline generation, judged by how well it works in play, whether it has a clear battle role, and how convincingly it delivers on its concept. Three of the original list’s generation labels are incorrect: Magcargo is from Generation II, while Cradily and Glalie are from Generation III.
How to read this ranking
The order below preserves PositionIsEverything’s May 11, 2026 ranking, from its least-favored pick to its less-bad choices. The assessments are the article author’s opinions, not official classifications or a consensus. The source offers qualitative reasons but no usage percentages, win rates, tier placements, or reproducible scoring. It considers in-game friction, battle role, typing and movepool coherence, competitive presence, and the feeling that a pick falls short; a Pokémon’s performance can differ between a single-player game and a competitive format.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Pokémon Pokopia - Nintendo Switch 2 | $69.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Pokémon Legends: Arceus - US Version | $54.25 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
![Pokémon FireRed Version Standard - Nintendo Switch [Digital Code]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/413QNFueWML._SL160_.jpg)
|
Pokémon FireRed Version Standard - Nintendo Switch [Digital Code] | $19.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Pokemon Shining Pearl - Nintendo Switch Shining Pearl Edition | $52.49 | Buy on Amazon |
The list’s scope is numbered mainline generations I–IX, not spin-offs. The generation corrections use National Pokédex numbers from the official Pokémon Pokédex: Magcargo is #219, Cradily #346, and Glalie #362. Those numbers place the species in Generations II, III, and III, respectively—not the generations assigned to them in the original ranking.
Worst to less bad: the nine picks
-
Generation IX: Cetoddle
The original article puts Cetoddle at the bottom of its ranking, arguing that it lacks a clear role. That is a subjective judgment, not a measured finding about its performance across Scarlet and Violet or competitive formats.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteSpecial offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.#1 Best Overall
Pokémon Pokopia - Nintendo Switch 2- Shape the world and build a cozy new life with Pokémon as a Ditto transformed to look like a human.
- Use other Pokémon’s moves, like Bulbasaur’s Leafage, to revitalize and navigate the world around you.
- Meet and befriend more Pokémon as you help nature flourish.
- Gather materials to create items and furniture, till the fields to grow delicious crops, build homes for the Pokémon you meet, and more—there’s so much to do!
- Experience a world with varied weather, real-time days and nights, and other surprises.
-
Generation VIII: Diggersby
In the author’s view, Diggersby is replaceable later in the game. That point depends on the player’s game, team, and alternatives; the article does not compare versions or provide evidence from a defined format.
-
Generation VII: Mega Glalie — species-generation label incorrect
The ranking criticizes Mega Glalie for not turning its Mega form into reliable pressure. Glalie itself debuted in Generation III, as its National Pokédex number #362 reflects. The original article’s Generation VII label is therefore incorrect. Mega Glalie is a Mega Evolution of that Generation III species, not a Generation VII Pokémon.
-
Generation VI: Pangoro
The article says Pangoro lacks a decisive offensive payoff. This is the author’s assessment of its appeal and role; no particular game, matchup set, or competitive usage data is supplied to establish it as a general weakness.
Rank #2
Sale
Pokémon Legends: Arceus - US Version- Action meets RPG in this new take on the Pokémon series
- Study Pokémon behaviors, sneak up on them, and toss a well-aimed Poké Ball to catch them
- Unleash moves in the speedy agile style or the powerful strong style in battles
- Travel to the Hisui region—the Sinnoh of old—and build the region’s first Pokédex
- Learn about the Mythical Pokémon Arceus, the key to this mysterious tale
-
Generation V: Liepard
Liepard is described as dependent on narrow conditions. The ranking does not identify a specific format or quantify how often those conditions matter, so treat this as a qualitative criticism rather than a format-wide result.
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy. -
Generation IV pick: Cradily — species-generation label incorrect
The author’s stated reason is that Cradily is slow. Cradily is a Generation III Pokémon, not Generation IV: its National Pokédex number is #346. The original generation label should be corrected, not repeated as fact.
-
Generation III: Relicanth
The article characterizes Relicanth as limited in utility. It does not define the battle format or provide comparative evidence for that claim.
Rank #3
Pokémon FireRed Version Standard - Nintendo Switch [Digital Code]- Set off on a grand adventure to become the Pokémon League Champion—now on Nintendo Switch!
- Celebrate 30 years of Pokémon with this Nintendo Switch version* of the Pokémon FireRed Version game originally released on the Game Boy Advance system!
- Additional games and systems required for multiplayer mode. Sold separately. 2004 Pokémon. 1995-2004 Nintendo/Creatures Inc./GAME FREAK inc. Pokémon and Nintendo Switch are trademarks of Nintendo.
-
Generation II: Jumpluff
Jumpluff is presented as disruptive but unable, in the author’s view, to turn that annoyance into enough damage. The article gives no usage or win-rate figures, so this is an editorial description rather than a competitive statistic.
-
Generation I pick: Magcargo — species-generation label incorrect
The author says Magcargo is difficult to justify against more straightforward choices. Magcargo is from Generation II, not Generation I; its National Pokédex number is #219. Correcting that label changes the list’s attribution, even though the criticism remains the source author’s opinion.
Recommended: Crashes or Glitches? A Free Driver Scan Usually Finds the Culprit →Recommended: Fix Windows Errors and Clear Junk Files in Minutes - Free Scan →Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
What this ranking can—and cannot—tell you
The list is useful as a set of debate prompts, not as a definitive verdict on nine generations. “Worst” could mean awkward to use during a particular story, weak in a named competitive format, poorly matched to its typing and moves, or simply disappointing in design. Those standards can produce different answers, and one Pokémon may feel much more useful in a single-player team than in a competitive environment.
Rank #4
- Revisit the Sinnoh region from the original Pokémon Pearl Version game and set off to try and become the Champion of the Pokémon League
- The Pokémon Shining Pearl game brings new life to this remade classic with added features
- Explore the Grand Underground to dig up items and Pokémon Fossils, build a Secret Base, and more.
- Test your style and rhythm in a Super Contest Show
- A reimagined adventure, now for the Nintendo Switch system
Because the source does not specify game availability, compare alternatives at the same point in the story, or cite format-specific usage data, it cannot establish that these are objectively the weakest Pokémon of their generations. Nor does it provide a single pick for each correctly identified generation: three selections belong to generations already represented elsewhere in the list.
A simple rubric for making your own picks
To build a more consistent ranking, choose the meaning of “worst” first, then assess each candidate by the same standards:
Quick Recap
- Fix the scope: decide whether you mean the numbered mainline generations, a specific game, or a competitive format. Do not mix those scopes without saying so.
- Check when it is available: for a story-play ranking, compare a Pokémon with alternatives the player can actually obtain at the same stage and in the same version.
- Look for a workable role: consider its typing, moves, and what it can contribute. A weakness in one role does not by itself make a Pokémon poor in every context.
- Name the format for competitive claims: usage and performance need a defined format and supporting data. Without those, describe the judgment as opinion rather than presenting it as a measured competitive result.
- Separate performance from taste: design, nostalgia, and personal appeal are legitimate criteria, but they answer a different question from battle effectiveness.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
