No. The viral claim that Wingdings predicted the September 11 attacks depends on a false premise: “Q33NY” was not the flight number of a plane involved in the attacks, according to Ashley Feinberg’s account in Gizmodo. Turning those characters into symbols may create an unsettling image, but it does not make the supposed flight identifier real or show that Wingdings encoded a prediction.
What the Q33NY email claimed
In the weeks after the September 11 attacks, versions of an email circulated telling readers to type “Q33NY” into Microsoft Word, enlarge the text, and change its font to Wingdings. The resulting symbols were presented as a hidden message connected to the attacks. The email’s central assertion was that Q33NY was the number of a plane that struck the World Trade Center.
Feinberg’s 2015 Gizmodo feature says no plane involved in the attacks had that flight number. The email therefore did not reveal a real flight identifier. Its apparent significance rested on a made-up or mistaken string, not verified evidence about the attacks.
Why the image is not a prediction
A symbol font maps typed characters to pictograms. A person can choose a string, display its glyphs, and then interpret the resulting image. That can produce a striking coincidence, but the image cannot establish that the original string was authentic, was chosen in advance, or predicted an event.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
- 500 pages
- Over 800 color images and diagrams
- Pull out bookmark of street map of Ground Zero with aerial photo identifying physical structures
- Fully sourced chapter end-notes
- Full Glossary of Terms and Supplemental Information
- The identifier test: Does the string correspond to a real flight involved in the attacks? In this case, Gizmodo says it does not.
- The interpretation test: Can symbols be read as resembling something associated with the event? An evocative resemblance is not proof of a hidden message.
- The evidence test: Is there a primary record showing the string was a genuine flight number or that the font’s designers encoded a prediction? The viral email does not provide such evidence.
The first test is decisive for the Q33NY claim: it fails because the alleged flight number was not real.
What Wingdings was made to do
Wingdings was designed as an icon font, not as a system for encoding predictions. Microsoft’s history of the font names designers Kris Holmes and Charles Bigelow, dates their work to 1990 and 1991, and says Microsoft Wingdings was released in 1992. Microsoft describes the fonts as providing “a harmoniously designed set of icons representing the common components of personal computer systems and the elements of graphical user interfaces.” See Microsoft Learn’s Wingdings history.
That purpose matters: the characters are graphical symbols assigned to keys, and seeing an image after switching fonts does not show that the text was designed as a coded message about a later event.
Earlier Wingdings rumors
Feinberg’s feature also revisits earlier episodes in which people interpreted Wingdings strings as ominous messages. It discusses claims involving “NYC” and the word “MILLENNIUM,” including interpretations circulating around the Y2K period. These are historical examples of people assigning meaning to symbol sequences; they do not establish that Wingdings’ designers intended those readings.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11The same caution applies across these stories: a surprising-looking conversion is not evidence of intent unless the underlying text and the alleged message can be independently substantiated.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How the story became a 9/11 claim
The Q33NY email circulated in the weeks following the attacks, according to Gizmodo, but the article does not establish an exact first-sending date. It reports that Microsoft found “no evidence of malicious intent” and quotes an unnamed Microsoft spokesperson saying, “To Microsoft’s mind, it’s very unfortunate that people are bringing this up again in light of the tragedy.” The quote is attributed to the spokesperson by role, not by personal name.
Without an original email or primary flight record establishing Q33NY as a real identifier, the accurate conclusion is limited but clear: the viral claim is not evidence that Wingdings predicted 9/11. For broader context on how false beliefs spread, Cailin O’Connor and James Owen Weatherall’s The Misinformation Age: How False Beliefs Spread is cited in an academic article’s bibliography; it is further reading about misinformation, not a source specifically documenting the Q33NY episode.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
