No. The two viral images showing Bill Clinton with Stephen Hawking in a princess outfit are AI-generated, not authentic photographs from the Epstein files. The person identified as their creator told fact-checkers he made them with Grok; the captions and purported file numbers are false. AFP and Lead Stories examined the claim.
Are these images actually in the Epstein files?
Fact-checkers found no record matching either identifier printed on the images: “E887671” and “E663337.” AFP says searches of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Epstein-file database for those numbers returned no matching documents. Lead Stories also reports no match for one of the purported numbers. These are findings reported by the fact-checkers, not a claim that every image or reference in the broader database was checked.
The false captions circulated with a claim that the pictures showed Clinton carrying Hawking on Epstein Island. AFP reports that a simplified-Chinese Weibo post made that claim on March 8, 2026. The viral captions presented the invented identifiers as Epstein-file image numbers, but AFP’s database searches did not substantiate them.
Where did the pictures come from?
AFP’s reverse-image searches traced the Clinton-carrying-Hawking image to a February 28, 2026 post in a Facebook group called “Crazed AI.” The other image appeared in the same group on March 1. This trail places the pictures in an AI-generated-content group before the Weibo claim reported by AFP.
#1 Best Overall
AFP reports that Marc-André Lavoie told it on March 12 that he generated the images with Grok and that the captions and file numbers were fake. Lead Stories reported that Lavoie told it on March 10: “Yes, I created the prompts myself and generated the images in Grok.” Lead Stories also says it could not independently verify that he was the original creator, so his account is a reported creator admission rather than independently established authorship.
How strong is the evidence that they are AI-generated?
The most relevant evidence is the images’ online provenance, the reported creator admission, and the lack of matches for the claimed DOJ file numbers. AI-detection results and visual oddities offer additional clues, but should not be treated as proof on their own.
- AFP reports that Hive Moderation found the images likely to contain AI-generated or deepfake content.
- Lead Stories reports a 94% Hive Moderation likelihood score for one image. That is a result from a particular tool applied to one image, not a general probability that the claim is false.
- Newschecker says AI or Not and Hive Moderation flagged the pictures as likely AI-generated and notes unusual-looking fingers.
Detector outputs are tool-specific and can be wrong; they support, but do not establish, the conclusion. The provenance and false file-number claims are more directly relevant to whether these particular pictures are authentic Epstein-file photographs. Newschecker’s fact-check also documents the detector findings.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Does this mean Clinton and Hawking never appear in Epstein-related material?
No. This verdict is limited to the two princess-outfit images and their accompanying file-number claims; it does not mean every image or reference to either public figure in Epstein-related records is fake. AFP reported that the DOJ released another three million documents on January 30, 2026, and that Clinton and Hawking appear in other images among the material. AFP describes Clinton in separate pool and hot-tub images and Hawking in a photograph at a 2006 physics conference funded by Epstein. Those are different images from the viral pictures.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteRank #3
- Students build unmatched deductive-reasoning skills as they become crime-solving stars
- Most scenarios have more than one plausible outcome, allowing individuals or groups to broadly interpret evidence
- Includes interpretive handwriting, body language, fingerprinting, and many more activities
As AFP cautions, “The mere mention of someone in the Epstein files does not imply any wrongdoing.” A person’s appearance in a document or photograph is not, by itself, evidence of criminal conduct. Nor can an AI-generated image establish that the depicted event happened or that the people pictured had the relationship it implies.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
