In 2016, a story created with an AI program and human input advanced through the first screening round of Japan’s Nikkei Hoshi Shinichi Literary Award. It did not win. The episode is notable as an early example of AI-assisted fiction entering a literary competition—not as a case of a machine independently writing a prize-winning novel.
What happened at the Hoshi Shinichi Award?
The work was titled The Day A Computer Writes A Novel (Japanese: “コンピュータが小説を書く日”). A team led by Hitoshi Matsubara at Future University Hakodate submitted it to the third Hoshi Shinichi Award. The team submitted two stories, and one passed the initial screening stage. The report described this as the first time the award had received submissions made using an AI program. Futurism’s 2016 report and the team’s 2016 workshop paper document the event.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
What You Are Looking For Is in the Library: A Life-Affirming Story About Finding Hope, Purpose, and... | $8.68 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Breasts and Eggs: A Novel | $13.61 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Fahrenheit 451 | $13.58 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Silence: A Novel (Picador Classics) | $9.94 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
The Memory Police: A Novel | $9.99 | Buy on Amazon |
“Passed screening” means the story advanced through an early selection round. It does not mean it reached the final or won the award.
How much of the story did the AI write?
The project was a human–AI collaboration. According to Futurism, the researchers selected words and sentences and set parameters for the program; the system then assembled the story. The workshop paper likewise records two submissions by the research team and identifies the Japanese title of the story.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors#1 Best Overall
This was a constrained story-generation project, not evidence that a modern large language model independently composed a novel. The distinction matters: the program generated text within a process shaped by human choices.
What did the judges and award report say?
Satoshi Hase, a Japanese science-fiction novelist who was part of the award press conference, praised the story’s construction while pointing to a limitation. Futurism quoted him: “I was surprised at the work because it was a well structured novel. But there are still some problems [to overcome] to win the prize, such as character descriptions.”
Rank #2
That assessment helps put the first-round advancement in perspective. The story showed enough structure to clear an initial screen, while character description remained a stated weakness. The evidence does not establish that judges considered it a likely winner.
How many entries were involved?
Futurism reported 1,450 total entries in 2016 and described 11 submissions as written by “non-humans.” That wording belongs to the report; it should not be taken to mean that all 11 were fully autonomous machine-authored works. Separately, the team’s workshop paper says its researchers submitted two stories.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Rank #3
Why does this 2016 story still matter?
The episode captures a question that remains useful in discussions of creative technology: what does it mean for a computer to write fiction when people choose the material and rules that shape its output? In this case, the answer is not an either-or. The program assembled a story, but human decisions framed the generation process.
It is also a specific milestone, not a measure of AI’s literary ability in general. The available accounts establish a first-round screening result in one award, along with a judge’s comment on structure and character description. They do not establish a broader trend, reader response, or the standing of today’s AI systems.
Rank #4
Where to read more
The Association for Computational Linguistics paper, “A Challenge to the Third Hoshi Shinichi Award,” provides the research team’s account of its submissions. Futurism’s report offers the award context and Hase’s comment. The Hoshi Library’s news archive records a November 2016 nonfiction book by Dr. Satoshi Sato about his team’s effort to create a story-writing AI. The archive also lists works by Shinichi Hoshi, the award’s namesake; those are literary context, not AI-generated works.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
