Films have challenged taboos in different ways: some ran against Hollywood’s own Production Code, while others faced government action, legal challenges, classification cuts or a distributor’s withdrawal. These eight titles offer a useful cross-section, not a definitive ranking—and the evidence is more detailed for some films than for others.
What counted as a cinematic taboo?
There was no single censor or universal list of forbidden subjects. In the United States, the Motion Picture Production Code was an industry standard adopted in 1930. Its enforcement arm, the Production Code Administration (PCA), began operating in 1934. The Code constrained what studios could show, including nudity, suggestive dancing, interracial romance, homosexuality, religious mockery, illegal drugs, childbirth, explicit adultery and detailed murder. It also discouraged stories in which criminals escaped justice. The American Civil Liberties Union describes the Code as an industry self-censorship standard that lasted from 1930 into the late 1950s; the film industry formally abandoned it in 1968 and adopted age-based ratings instead. ACLU; PBS
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Universal Classic Monsters: Complete 30-Film Collection | $99.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Saw: 8-Film Collection - DVD, BLURAY | $24.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Harry Potter: The Complete 8-Film Collection (BD) | $39.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
![Harry Potter: 8-Film Collection [4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/514OqH0FqSL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Harry Potter: 8-Film Collection [4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray] | $68.75 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
![Hammer Horror 8-Film Collection [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61FY4OVmtiL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Hammer Horror 8-Film Collection [Blu-ray] | $26.25 | Buy on Amazon |
“Pre-Code” refers specifically to films made between the 1930 guidelines and the PCA’s creation in 1934. It does not mean every film made before the Code ended in 1968. BFI
Control could also come from outside the studio system. A classification board might require cuts or assign an age certificate; a government or local authority could attempt to block a film; a court could overturn a ban; or a rights holder could withdraw a film despite its having been passed. The cases below illustrate these differences rather than treating “censorship” as one interchangeable outcome.
#1 Best Overall
Eight films associated with challenges to screen taboos
1. The Outlaw
The Outlaw appears among the American film-censorship case studies listed by Columbia University Press. That listing makes it a relevant title for a history of screen regulation, but the available evidence here does not establish which specific taboo it challenged, what restrictions it faced or how its release history unfolded. Columbia University Press
2. Psycho
Columbia University Press also includes Psycho among its film-censorship case studies. The source supports its place in a discussion of censorship, but does not, by itself, verify a particular controversy or censorship decision for the film. Columbia University Press
Rank #2
- This item has no German language and subtitles.
3. Bonnie and Clyde
Bonnie and Clyde is another title listed in Columbia University Press’s account of American film regulation. The listing does not specify the taboo at issue or document a particular restriction, so it is best understood here as a case-study title rather than as a fully established censorship episode. Columbia University Press
4. Midnight Cowboy
Columbia University Press names Midnight Cowboy among its censorship case studies. That places it within the broader history of American film regulation, but the available source does not detail the controversy or decision connected to this film. Columbia University Press
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesRank #3
- Brand New in box. The product ships with all relevant accessories
5. The Exorcist
The Exorcist also appears in Columbia University Press’s list of films examined in a history of American censorship. The listing supports including it in this conversation, not making a specific claim about what was censored or how authorities responded. Columbia University Press
6. A Clockwork Orange
The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) passed A Clockwork Orange with an X certificate and no cuts in 1971. The film’s later absence from UK circulation was not a BBFC ban: the board says director Stanley Kubrick withdrew it in 1973 amid press reports and threats to his family. It returned in 1999 with an 18 certificate, again without cuts, after Kubrick’s death and with his family’s agreement. BBFC
Rank #4
- Harry Potter: 8 Film Collection (4K)
The board’s then secretary, Stephen Murphy, explained why it had passed the film: “Disturbed though we were by the first half of the film, which is basically a statement of some of the problems of violence, we were, nonetheless, satisfied by the end of the film that it could not be accused of exploitation: quite the contrary, it is a valuable contribution to the whole debate about violence.” The statement is recorded by the BBFC. BBFC
7. Last Tango in Paris
Last Tango in Paris shows how a classification decision could shift when the legal context changed. The BBFC passed it with an X certificate after a 10-second cut on 16 February 1973. In 1978, after the Obscene Publications Act was applied to films under the Criminal Law Act 1977, BBFC Secretary James Ferman passed it uncut with an X certificate. His reasoning was that the work as a whole was not obscene and that its artistic merit could be considered. BBFC
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Best Value
8. The Miracle
The Miracle became part of a landmark legal challenge to government censorship. According to the ACLU, the US Supreme Court unanimously rejected New York’s ban on the film in Burstyn v. New York. The case illustrates a different kind of taboo dispute: a government effort to suppress a film that was challenged in court, rather than a studio’s application of its own code or a classification board’s decision. ACLU
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why “banned” is not a catch-all
These histories are not equivalent. A studio code shaped production from within the industry; a classification decision addressed whether and how a film could be shown under a particular system; a court case could test government power; and a rights holder could withdraw a film after it had already been passed. A Clockwork Orange is a particularly clear warning against calling every period of unavailability a ban by censors: the BBFC passed it, and Kubrick withdrew it from UK circulation. Last Tango in Paris, meanwhile, received a cut classification in 1973 and an uncut classification in 1978 as the legal framework changed.
There is no single sourced scale that establishes which film broke the most taboos. The comparison depends on what is being measured—subject matter, institutional control, legal outcome, distribution or public response—and on the country and period in question.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Recommended Free Tools
