What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
In September 2025, Senior Chief Operations Specialist Alexandro Wiggins told a House task force that during a February 2023 watch aboard USS Jackson, off Southern California, he saw a light that appeared to rise from the ocean, and later tracked four objects on radar and on the ship’s SAFIRE sensor. He also said plainly that he had no visual evidence showing the light came from the water. The publicly circulated video does not show the emergence or the four-object departure. The account is a named witness’s interpretation, and it remains unresolved.
What Wiggins reported
Wiggins’s testimony places the event at approximately 19:15 PST on 15 February 2023, inside the W-291 warning area off Southern California. The sequence he described, in his own telling, runs as follows:
- Radar contact. A radar contact first drew his attention.
- Visual check. He went to the port bridge wing to look.
- Back to radar and SAFIRE. He returned to the radar and used the ship’s SAFIRE sensor.
- A light near the horizon. He saw what he initially took to be a light rise slowly to roughly 3,000 to 4,000 feet, then accelerate.
- Four objects. He later saw four objects in the radar and SAFIRE picture. He did not initially see all four with his unaided eyes.
He estimated the encounter lasted roughly five to seven minutes. His speed description was a visual impression, not an instrument reading, and he testified that he was not qualified to estimate aircraft speed by sight.
The qualification that matters most
The central claim of the headline is the rise from the water, and that is the part Wiggins hedged most carefully. His exact words, given to the House task force, were:
#1 Best Overall
- Based on accounts and sightings of unidentified crafts as described and witnessed over the years
- Includes landing gear and open hatch panels, as well as closed hatch panels for building a flying display model
- Comes in gray, with a plastic clear diffused green lenses perfect for lighting
“My personal thoughts after seeing what I saw is that it did, in fact, come from the water, but I do not have visual evidence showing exactly, you know, that it did, in fact, come from the water.”
He added that at night and at a distance he could not tell whether the light was on the horizon or surfacing from the water. The belief that it came from the sea was his conclusion after weighing possible explanations, not something he observed directly. Any paraphrase should keep both halves of that statement.
Rank #2
- Complete Space Adventure: Includes UFO, 2 aliens, 1 astronaut, and 1 space sled for immersive play.
- Interactive UFO Features: Opening center capsule and fold-down landing gear enhance storytelling fun.
- Poseable Figures: Astronaut and alien figures have moveable joints for realistic action.
- Inspires Imagination: Encourages creative roleplay and storytelling for budding space explorers.
- Durable & Kid-Friendly: Made for ages 3+, designed with sturdy, safe materials for everyday play.
What the public video does and does not show
The case analysis published by OverClassified, which is the main independent review of the released footage, describes the video as about 33 seconds long. Its key limits are:
- It shows two unresolved thermal points.
- It does not capture the light rising from the water, which is the moment at the heart of the headline.
- It does not show the formation of four objects or their simultaneous departure.
- The original unstabilized recording and the radar data are not known to have been released.
These gaps leave the account unresolved. They do not establish that Wiggins fabricated his observations, and they do not establish that his interpretation is correct. Both possibilities remain open on the public record.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Rank #3
- HO Scale (1:87) – Sized for standard model railroads and diorama scenes (approx. 81.8 mm x 13.8 mm)
- Simple Assembly – Two-piece design; just glue the top and bottom together and you’re done
- Fun Origin Story – Scaled using movie-inspired proportions from E.T. for an authentic retro look
- Paint-Ready Finish – Printed in smooth black plastic that accepts most modeling paints
Claim by claim: what is on the record
| Element of the account | What Wiggins said | What the public record shows | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time and place | About 19:15 PST, 15 February 2023, warning area W-291 off Southern California | Stated in congressional testimony; the case analysis does not independently confirm it | Stated by witness; not independently confirmed in public sources |
| Initial detection | A radar contact first drew his attention | Radar data not known to have been released | Unverified publicly |
| Light rising from the water | Appeared to rise slowly to about 3,000 to 4,000 feet, then accelerate | Video shows two unresolved thermal points and not the rise | Unresolved |
| Speed | Visual impression only; he said he was not qualified to judge aircraft speed by sight | No instrument measurement of speed is published | Not measured publicly |
| Four objects | Seen on radar and SAFIRE later; not all four seen unaided | Video does not show the formation or departure | Unresolved |
| Origin from the water | His personal belief; he said he had no visual evidence | No footage of an emergence from the sea | Unresolved |
| Identity of the objects | Not identified in his testimony | No identification established in the sources discussed | Unidentified |
Why the water question is hard to settle
Night and distance
Lights near the horizon at night are hard to judge for range and motion. Wiggins said as much himself. Deciding whether a light rose from the sea or simply moved against a dark horizon requires a reliable reference point, and the public material does not supply one.
Radar and sensor data
The radar track and the full, unstabilized SAFIRE recording would be the most direct way to reconstruct the object’s path. Without them, the public record contains only a short clip and one witness’s description. Stabilized, edited, or compressed video can make a path look more or less dramatic than it was, so the original files matter.
Rank #4
- Detailed model kit
- Haunebu II 1/144 Scale Plastic Model Kit Pegasus
- Contains: One Plastic Model Kit
- Scale: 1/144
- Ages: 14 And up
Corroboration
A single observer’s account carries less weight than the same account confirmed by other crew who were on watch or who saw the radar and sensor displays. If such accounts exist, they are not part of the public record discussed here.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What would change the picture
- Release of the original, unstabilized sensor recording, with its metadata intact.
- Release of the radar track data for the same window.
- Independent crew statements about the radar and sensor displays.
- Official records that establish the ship’s position and the warning area’s status that night.
Without those, the question of whether the light came from the water cannot be decided from what is publicly available.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Best Value
- UFO
- UFO114cm22cm
- Atlantis Modelive ()
How to weigh the sources
Congressional testimony
The House hearing transcript containing Wiggins’s written statement and oral testimony is the primary source. It is the authority for what he said, when and where he said the event occurred, and his explicit caveat about lacking visual proof of the water origin.
Interesting Engineering, 18 April 2025
This is secondary reporting. It is useful for publication context, and it identifies Wiggins as a Navy senior chief, but it does not independently confirm the event or the origin of the objects. Its page uses a representational image that does not depict the USS Jackson sighting.
OverClassified case analysis
This is the most detailed review of the released footage’s length and limits, and it names the evidence gaps. Its analytical conclusions should be treated as one reviewer’s view, not as established fact.
The most recent reporting described here dates from 2025. Newer primary records would change this assessment, so readers should check for any later release of the original recording or radar data.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches”
The Bottom Line
The public record supports one firm point: a named Navy senior chief testified under oath that he saw a light and later four objects on radar and SAFIRE during a February 2023 watch aboard USS Jackson. It does not support the headline’s claim that the objects came out of the sea. Wiggins himself said he had no visual evidence of that. The objects remain unidentified, and the origin question is unresolved.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
