The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →SuperSport’s documentary Crossing the Line follows Australia’s fraught 2018 Test tour of South Africa, building to the Cape Town ball-tampering scandal. The official inquiry found that David Warner devised the plan, Cameron Bancroft carried it out, and captain Steve Smith knew about it and directed Bancroft to conceal evidence. Bancroft later said he wanted to fit in. Those are distinct kinds of explanation: investigation findings establish actions and knowledge, while Bancroft’s interview gives his account of his motivation.
What is SuperSport’s Crossing the Line about?
Crossing the Line is a 60-minute SuperSport documentary about the five-week 2018 Test series between Australia and South Africa, according to Scroll’s January 2019 report. It covers more than the incident at Newlands: the series had already seen David Warner confront Quinton de Kock in Durban and Kagiso Rabada exchange heated words with Steve Smith in Port Elizabeth. Those flashpoints form the tour’s wider context, but they were different events from the later attempt to alter the ball.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Bratla Hanging Cricket Practice Ball with String – Hard PVC Tethered Training Ball for Batting... | $8.49 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
CD-2 Red Leather Cricket Ball Practice | $9.25 | Buy on Amazon |
The film is a narrative account of the tour, not the authority for the official findings. The roles and Cricket Australia sanctions below come from reporting on its investigation; Bancroft’s explanation of why he acted is his own retrospective account.
What happened in the Cape Town ball-tampering scandal?
During the third Test at Newlands in Cape Town in March 2018, television footage showed Bancroft handling an object and trying to hide it. At first, the object appeared in broadcast images to be yellow tape. Later reporting on Cricket Australia’s investigation identified it as sandpaper, which Bancroft used in an attempt to roughen one side of the ball.
#1 Best Overall
- DURABLE HARD PVC CONSTRUCTION: Made from high-quality hard PVC, this hanging cricket ball is built to withstand repeated powerful shots without cracking or deforming — ideal for long-term batting practice.
- SOLO BATTING PRACTICE ANYTIME: Train alone without a bowler or partner. The tethered cord design allows the ball to return after every hit, making it perfect for home, backyard, nets, or garage practice.
- IMPROVES HAND-EYE COORDINATION: Designed to help batters track the ball, judge swing, and improve reaction time, making it an excellent training aid for developing consistent shot timing.
- REALISTIC FEEL FOR BETTER TIMING: Unlike soft training balls, the hard PVC material mimics real ball impact, helping players practice proper bat control and shot execution.
- FOR PLAYERS OF ALL SKILL LEVELS: Suitable for club and experienced players, this cricket training ball supports skill development at every level.
The aim was to change the ball’s condition and potentially affect its movement through the air. As ABC’s timeline of the scandal explains, players could polish the ball without artificial substances, but could not apply an artificial substance or scratch its surface with an implement.
How did SuperSport’s cameras capture the incident?
SuperSport’s cameras recorded Bancroft handling the object and attempting to conceal it. The network’s head of production, Alvin Naicker, said the first images did not make clear what Bancroft held. The attempt to put the yellow object down his trousers made the production team realize the incident was serious. In a March 27, 2018 report by cricket.com.au, Naicker described the moment: “The moment he tried to dispose of it in his pants, we knew that this was a major incident. Until then, we were not sure what we were looking at.”
Naicker said SuperSport had seven dedicated cameras following the ball and 30 cameras at the ground. Those figures are his description of the broadcast operation, not an independently audited camera count. He also described the broadcaster’s editorial responsibility this way: “We have a responsibility to entertain, but just like journalists we have a moral obligation to provide unbiased editorial.”
What did Cricket Australia’s investigation find?
Cricket Australia’s inquiry, as summarized in contemporaneous cricket.com.au coverage, assigned different roles to the three players:
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →- David Warner: the inquiry found that the vice-captain was behind the plan to alter the ball and enlisted Bancroft to carry it out.
- Cameron Bancroft: he carried out the attempt to alter the ball and was filmed trying to hide the object.
- Steve Smith: the inquiry found that the captain knew about the plan, did not stop it, and directed Bancroft to conceal evidence.
The inquiry found that coach Darren Lehmann had no prior knowledge. That finding matters because footage of Lehmann using a walkie-talkie to contact 12th man Peter Handscomb had prompted public speculation about what he knew.
Rank #2
- Red Practice Ball
- 4 Piece
- 156 Grams
- Satisfaction Guarantee
Why did Bancroft use sandpaper?
In a December 2018 ABC interview, Bancroft said Warner suggested that he carry out the act. Bancroft also said he wanted to “fit in” and feel valued. That is Bancroft’s later explanation of his own decision; it should not be confused with the inquiry’s findings about who planned, knew about, carried out, or concealed the act.
Smith later characterized his failure to intervene as a leadership failure, in the same ABC report. The documentary places the scandal within a tense tour, while the inquiry and participants’ later accounts address different questions. The sources cited here do not establish a single cause or a study-based statistic explaining why the team crossed the line.
What were the sanctions?
Cricket Australia banned Smith and Warner for 12 months each and Bancroft for nine months. These were Cricket Australia’s suspensions, distinct from the immediate match sanctions imposed by the International Cricket Council, which ABC’s timeline reports separately.
Is this the same Crossing the Line as Gideon Haigh’s book?
No. Gideon Haigh’s Crossing the Line: How Australian Cricket Lost Its Way is a separate book, not the SuperSport documentary. ABC describes the book as examining circumstances Haigh believed led to the Cape Town plot. The shared title phrase can cause confusion, so distinguish the film from the book when looking for either one.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
