Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
In May 2025, Smokey Robinson’s attorney denied allegations of sexual assault and rape made by four former employees, calling them “vile” and “false.” The civil case later expanded to include claims by six former employees, according to September 2026 reporting. The allegations have not been established in court.
What did the former employees allege?
The original complaint was filed on May 6, 2025, in Los Angeles Superior Court by four former employees using pseudonyms, according to the Associated Press. They alleged that Robinson repeatedly sexually assaulted and raped them while they worked for him between 2007 and 2024. The complaint also alleged workplace and wage violations and sought at least $50 million.
![Motown Classics Gold[2 CD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51zqFKSOfxL._SL160_.jpg)
![Soul Classics: All Time Greatest Hits Collection The Ultimate Best of 100+ Tracks Collection [CD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51MsJfEslJL._SL160_.jpg)
These are claims made by the plaintiffs in a civil lawsuit, not findings by a court. In its May 2025 report, the Associated Press described the four plaintiffs as former housekeepers.
How did Robinson’s lawyer respond?
Attorney Christopher Frost rejected the allegations on Robinson’s behalf. In a statement reported by the Associated Press in May 2025, Frost called them “vile” and “false” and said the evidence would show the lawsuit was an effort to extract money from Robinson. He also said the defense would address what it described as concerns about the complaint’s timelines, inconsistencies, and relationships among plaintiffs.
#1 Best Overall
Frost’s comments represented the defense’s position. The plaintiffs’ lawyers, Harris and Hayden, told the Associated Press: “We stand behind our four clients’ truthful claims, which are neither false nor vile, but clearly describe Mr. Robinson’s despicable criminal acts.” That statement was the plaintiffs’ lawyers’ position, not a court determination.
The Los Angeles Times reported a further statement from Frost: “We will have more to say in the coming days as we make our legal response, and in time Mr. Robinson will respond in his own words,” attorney Christopher Frost said in a Wednesday statement to The Times. “As this case progresses, the evidence (the crucial element that guides us) will show that this is simply an ugly method of trying to extract money from an 85-year-old American icon — $50 million dollars, to be exact.”
Rank #2
- Shrink-wrapped
Did police open an investigation?
Yes. The Associated Press reported on May 15, 2025, that the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department had opened an investigation and characterized it as being at an early stage. A legal-news report dated September 21, 2026, said the investigation remained open and no criminal charges had been filed as of that report. An investigation is not the same as a criminal charge or a finding that an allegation is true.
How has the civil case changed?
The original May 2025 complaint involved four former employees. In November 2025, the Los Angeles Times reported that plaintiffs’ counsel sought permission to amend it to add allegations from two additional former employees: a fifth housekeeper and a male former employee who detailed the couple’s cars. A September 2026 legal-news report described six former employees pursuing claims. The expansion of the case does not itself resolve the allegations.
Rank #3
What has the court decided, and what comes next?
In April 2026, Judge Kevin C. Brazile struck defamation claims from counterclaims brought by the Robinsons, while allowing certain other counterclaims to proceed, according to MyNewsLA. The Robinsons appealed. The ruling addressed those counterclaims; it did not determine whether the former employees’ underlying allegations were true.
MyNewsLA reported on August 18, 2026, that a hearing on the former employees’ request for $1.23 million in attorney fees had been moved from September 1 to September 29. The amount was requested, not reported as awarded. A September 21, 2026 report described an October 11, 2027 trial date, which remains subject to court scheduling changes.
Rank #4
The available reporting through September 21, 2026, does not establish the result of the September 29 fee hearing or a later ruling on the appeal. The trial date is a scheduled future date, not a resolution of the case.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
