Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Kevin Hart sued YouTuber Tasha K and his former personal assistant Miesha Shakes over a December 2023 interview, alleging defamation and an effort to obtain money to keep information from being published. Those were Hart’s allegations, not findings that either defendant committed extortion or defamation. Hart settled with Tasha K in 2025 on terms that were not publicly disclosed; claims against Shakes were restored to the court calendar in July 2025. The latest sourced report said no trial date had been set.
Why did Kevin Hart sue Tasha K and Miesha Shakes?
Hart and his company, K. Hart Enterprises, filed the Los Angeles County Superior Court case in December 2023. It arose from an interview in which Shakes, Hart’s former assistant, discussed her experience working for him. The amended complaint listed five causes of action: civil extortion, breach of contract, intentional interference with contractual relations, invasion of privacy through public disclosure of private facts, and defamation. The claims applied differently to Hart, his company, and the individual and corporate defendants.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
![Kevin Hart 4-Movie Collection [DVD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51MDP3usqFL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Kevin Hart 4-Movie Collection [DVD] | $3.28 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Kevin Hart: I'm a Grown Little Man | $6.49 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Kevin Hart: Seriously Funny | Buy on Amazon | |
| 4 |
![Comedy Classics [DVD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/518s1ALGfhL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Comedy Classics [DVD] | $7.85 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Hamlet: (1996) Special Edition (Dbl DVD) | $17.86 | Buy on Amazon |
Hart alleged that someone affiliated with Tasha K demanded $250,000 to prevent the interview from being published. The complaint also accused the defendants of making false statements and alleged that the interview suggested Hart had engaged in criminal conduct and violated a non-disclosure agreement. These allegations were disputed and were not established findings of liability. Courthouse News Service reported on Hart’s request for an order to remove the interview.
Shakes disputed Hart’s account
Shakes denied taking part in an extortion plot. She said that her use of the word “charges” referred to possible civil allegations, not criminal charges. In a declaration reported by MyNewsLA, she also disputed Hart’s account of the non-disclosure agreement, saying she had not understood it to include a confidentiality clause. Those were Shakes’s statements, not court findings.
#1 Best Overall
What did the court decide about the interview?
In January 2024, a judge declined Hart’s request for an order requiring Tasha K to remove the interview and related material. Courthouse News reported that the judge raised concerns about the request’s breadth and its implications for prior restraint. That decision addressed the requested injunction; it did not determine whether the interview’s statements were true.
Later anti-SLAPP proceedings produced a mixed, procedural result. The court granted Tasha K’s motion as to Hart and K. Hart Enterprises’ civil-extortion claim, and the company’s invasion-of-privacy and defamation claims. It denied the motion as to contractual-interference claims and Hart’s individual defamation and privacy claims. The tentative ruling sets out the claims affected: Hart v. Shakes anti-SLAPP tentative ruling.
Rank #2
Courthouse News reported that Hart’s individual defamation claim against Tasha K had “minimal merit” to proceed past that motion. Judge Holly Fujie explained that “Shakes and Kebe’s use of the word ‘charges,’ in context and based on the common usage of the word, could lead a reasonable observer to conclude that Hart faced criminal prosecution.” The judge also noted that the defendants did not dispute Hart had never faced criminal charges connected to the Las Vegas incident. This was a threshold decision about whether a claim could proceed, not a final finding that defamation occurred. Courthouse News Service’s report on the ruling describes that distinction.
Did Kevin Hart settle with Tasha K?
Yes. Hart and Tasha K reached a settlement in February 2025, according to MyNewsLA. The reported court papers did not disclose its terms, so the public record cited here does not establish whether money changed hands or what either party agreed to do. The scheduled April trial was vacated. Hart’s attorney later clarified that the case was not resolved as to Shakes and that claims against her would continue. MyNewsLA’s February settlement report and its April report on the claims against Shakes cover those developments.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchRank #3
What happened to the claims against Shakes?
On June 26, 2025, the judge dismissed Hart’s remaining claims against Shakes without prejudice after noting that a declaration explaining why dismissal was unwarranted had not been filed. A dismissal without prejudice does not itself bar a party from refiling in appropriate circumstances.
On July 7–8, the judge restored the claims to the calendar after Hart’s attorney established that the declaration had been filed on April 3. MyNewsLA reported on July 8 that no trial date had been set. Its reports explain the dismissal and restoration: dismissal report and restoration report. The sources cited here do not establish later case activity.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Factory sealed DVD
Rank #4
What the case’s status does—and does not—show
- Hart’s $250,000 extortion account was an allegation in his complaint, not a verified payment or a court finding.
- The anti-SLAPP rulings were mixed and addressed whether particular claims could proceed at that stage. They did not decide ultimate liability.
- Hart settled with Tasha K, but the reported settlement terms were not public.
- The claims against Shakes were restored to the calendar after a filing clarification; the latest sourced report said no trial date had been set.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
