In March 2021, Wookieepedia’s volunteer editors debated whether a trans, non-binary Star Wars contributor should be identified by the name they had used in credits or by their chosen name. Fandom, the platform hosting the wiki, intervened: it said its Terms of Use prohibited knowingly using a deadname in an article title, closed the vote and reinstated five editors who had been banned over disputed voting activity.
What was the dispute about?
Wookieepedia is a Fandom-hosted Star Wars fan wiki. Its general approach to real-world creatives had been to use the name under which a person was credited for Star Wars work, even if that person later changed their name. The dispute concerned trans non-binary artist Robin Pronovost, who asked the wiki to use their name and pronouns. James Whitbrook’s March 30, 2021, io9 report described a wiki with more than 165,000 articles at the time; that is a 2021 figure, not a current count.
The question was not whether Pronovost had been credited under a former name. It was whether that credit should determine the title of an article about them after they had changed their name, or whether the page should use their chosen name and make the credited name a redirect.
What did Wookieepedia’s vote propose?
On March 16, 2021, an editor proposed adding this rule to the wiki’s Consensus Track: “If a real-world person is transgender and has changed their name since working on Star Wars, their article may be titled by their chosen name and the credited name turned into a redirect.” The proposal aimed to let people find the page through the name in a credit without making that former name the page title.
#1 Best Overall
According to io9’s account of the 2021 process, editors had two weeks to vote, with March 30 as the deadline. Voters on site-policy questions needed at least 50 contributions, and the proposal required a 2:1 majority. Those details describe the vote at that time; they should not be read as a statement of Wookieepedia’s current voting rules.
How did the vote become a platform-level controversy?
The Star Wars journal Eleven-ThirtyEight publicized the vote and encouraged eligible, active editors to take part. Wookieepedia administrators then banned five editors and removed votes they believed were connected to solicitation. That enforcement turned a local policy debate into a conflict over who could participate and which rules had authority.
Rank #2
Fandom intervened, closed the vote and reinstated the five editors. Tim Quievryn, then Fandom’s Director of Community Safety, told io9: “Since this supersedes local policies, this vote should be closed and policies should be updated to reflect the Terms of Use.”
What did Fandom say about deadnames?
Fandom VP of Community Brandon Rhea told io9 that “knowingly using a deadname in an article title is a violation of our Terms of Use” and said the determination applied globally across Fandom wikis. In the company’s stated position, the platform’s Terms of Use took precedence over a local community vote or naming policy.
That distinction matters: Wookieepedia editors were debating a local rule through their community process, while Fandom asserted authority as the platform operator. Rhea’s explanation and the intervention describe Fandom’s position in March 2021; they do not establish the wording or enforcement of Fandom’s current Terms of Use.
What happened to Robin Pronovost’s page?
Whitbrook’s contemporaneous report said Pronovost’s Wookieepedia page then used their name and pronouns. A later Wookieepedia-hosted history summary also records the vote, Fandom’s intervention, the lifting of the bans, later action involving two senior administrators and an apology to Pronovost. The summary is community-maintained; the contemporaneous io9 account is the main reporting source for the sequence of events.
Rank #4
Pronovost told io9: “Human rights should never be put to a vote.” They also said that whether a former name remains attached as a credit should be the individual’s choice. Their statement put the dispute in personal terms: a prior credit may be part of a work’s record, but the individual should have a say in how their identity is presented.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the 2021 outcome does—and does not—settle
The reported outcome for Pronovost’s page was that it used their name and pronouns, and Fandom stopped the local vote by asserting its Terms of Use superseded Wookieepedia policy. The available accounts establish what happened in that 2021 dispute, not what Fandom’s current policy says or how it is enforced today.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
