A declassified CIA/FBIS document repeats a 1993 press story claiming that a UFO attack turned 23 Soviet soldiers to stone. It does not verify the event: the one-page record reproduces a newspaper report and does not include the alleged KGB file said to support it.
What does the CIA UFO file actually say?
The document is titled “Paper Reports Alleged Evidence on Mishap Involving UFO.” Its header marks it unclassified and identifies its source as “KIEV HOLOS UKRAYINY IN UKRAINIAN 27 MAR 93 P 5.” The page begins by identifying the text as a reprint from the newspaper Ternopil Vechirniy, under the title “Cosmic Revenge.” Read the transcribed document.
![Shadow Operations: UFO Crash Retrieval Evidence & Cover Up [DVD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41aumEzj9IL._SL160_.jpg)
![Travis: The True Story Of Travis Walton [DVD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51jU4Rq-IYL._SL160_.jpg)
![The UFO Chronicles: A History of Mysterious Sightings [DVD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41y2vc0kbDL._SL160_.jpg)
That provenance matters: this is an archival record of a press report, not an authenticated CIA investigation into an alien attack. The document was approved for release in May 2000; the Kyiv Post’s April 14, 2025 account likewise describes it as a retelling, not confirmation or denial of the alleged incident.
What did the story claim happened?
In the clipping’s account, a low-flying saucer appeared over a military unit conducting training maneuvers in Siberia and was struck by a surface-to-air missile. Five short humanoid figures supposedly came out of the craft. According to two alleged survivors, the beings merged into a sphere, which emitted a brilliant flash.
#1 Best Overall
The story then claimed that 23 soldiers became “stone poles,” while two survived because they were standing in shade. It further said the craft and the supposed petrified soldiers were taken to a research institution near Moscow, where the soldiers’ molecular composition allegedly resembled limestone. These are details asserted by the reproduced story, not verified casualty figures, scientific findings, or evidence of recovered remains. The document text does not supply independent corroboration.
Where did the alleged evidence come from?
The story’s own source chain is indirect: the Ukrainian newspaper item cites Canadian Weekly World News, which reportedly said U.S. intelligence had obtained a 250-page KGB file. The CIA/FBIS page repeats that account but does not include the purported KGB file. The document archive entry identifies the one-page record; it does not establish the existence or contents of the separate file.
Rank #2
So the distinction is between a document that exists and the event described inside it. The page establishes that the press claim was reproduced in a released record. The materials cited here do not establish that the encounter occurred, that a 250-page KGB report exists, or that the CIA independently investigated it.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Did the CIA say the case was real?
The clipping attributes a conditional sentence to an unnamed “CIA representative”: “IF THE KGB FILE CORRESPONDS TO REALITY, THIS IS AN EXTREMELY MENACING CASE.” The representative is not named, and the statement appears within the press report reproduced by the document. It is not evidence that the agency authenticated the alleged file or endorsed the account.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsRank #3
- Factory sealed DVD
The story also attributes the phrase “A HORRIFIC PICTURE OF REVENGE ON THE PART OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL CREATURES, A PICTURE THAT MAKES ONE’S BLOOD FREEZE” to a CIA representative. That sensational wording is likewise nested in the report and must be read alongside its conditional framing, not as an official finding. Both quotations appear in the reproduced text.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Factory sealed DVD
What the one-page record does not establish
- No independently identified witnesses, military unit, exact incident date, physical remains, or scientific measurements are provided in the record.
- The figure of 23 is the number alleged by the clipping, not an independently verified death toll; the two survivors are also part of that unverified account.
- The purported KGB file is described secondhand and is not attached to the CIA/FBIS page.
- The existence of the released document does not authenticate the extraordinary story it reproduces.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
