Linda Lee Cadwell, Brandon Lee’s mother, filed a civil negligence lawsuit after he was fatally shot during production of The Crow. The case settled out of court in October 1993 for an undisclosed amount. A separate criminal investigation ended without charges, so the record does not establish a criminal conviction or a public trial.
What Cadwell’s lawsuit alleged
On August 11, 1993, the Los Angeles Times reported that Cadwell had filed suit in North Carolina Superior Court in Wilmington against Edward R. Pressman Film Corp. and 13 other corporations and individuals. The complaint alleged negligence by filmmakers and crew in their handling of firearms on set. The newspaper’s account describes allegations in the complaint, not findings made by a court. Read the Los Angeles Times report on the filing.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Crow (Blu-ray + Digital) | $11.19 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
The Crow - DVD, BLURAY, Digital | $9.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
The Crow: Salvation [Blu-ray] | $16.19 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
The Crow [Blu-ray] | $16.96 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
The Crow - BLURAY, Digital, 4K ULTRA HD | $20.90 | Buy on Amazon |
Why the criminal investigation led to no charges
In April 1993, Wilmington District Attorney Jerry Spivey described a series of events involving negligence and oversight by several people, while saying investigators had no indication that anyone intended to hurt Lee. The Los Angeles Times quoted him: “What we’re looking at is a chain of events where you have negligence and oversight here by several people that culminates in what happened.” He also said, “But there is no indication anybody was trying to hurt Brandon.” Read the report on Spivey’s remarks.
In September, Spivey announced that he would not file criminal charges against Crowvision, the production company. He said he found no evidence of the “willful and wanton” negligence he said would be required to prosecute it. That was the prosecutor’s explanation for his charging decision, not a judicial ruling that no negligence occurred. Read the Los Angeles Times report on the decision.
#1 Best Overall
What happened to the civil case
Cadwell’s negligence lawsuit settled in October 1993. A settlement ends a civil claim without a trial; the contemporary report gave no settlement amount and did not report an admission of liability. It also said Crowvision compensated Lee’s fiancée, Eliza Hutton. The terms and amount were not disclosed in the report. Read the Los Angeles Times settlement report.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to distinguish the three outcomes
| Proceeding or consequence | Who was involved | Reported outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Civil negligence claim | Cadwell sued the filmmakers and related parties. | Settled in October 1993 for an undisclosed amount; the report does not state that liability was admitted. |
| Criminal investigation | Wilmington District Attorney Jerry Spivey considered whether to prosecute Crowvision. | No criminal charges; Spivey said the evidence did not meet the threshold he cited. |
| Workplace violations | Filmmakers, as described in a later retrospective. | The Washington Post reported $77,000 in fines for workplace violations. This was separate from Cadwell’s private settlement and the decision not to file criminal charges. Read the 1994 retrospective. |
The $77,000 figure is a reported workplace fine, not the amount paid to Cadwell. The available reporting does not give the settlement’s dollar value.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- A modern re-imagining of the beloved character, The Crow, based on the original graphic novel by James O'Barr.
Rank #4
Rank #3
Rank #2
- A modern re-imagining of the beloved character, The Crow, based on the original graphic novel by James O'Barr.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.




