If you’re asking, “What is the best film adaptation of Macbeth?”, Throne of Blood (1957) is the strongest all-around pick when cinematic reinvention matters most. Roman Polanski’s Macbeth (1971) is the visceral, text-centered choice, while Joel Coen’s The Tragedy of Macbeth (2021) suits viewers drawn to stark visual design. This ranking is a reasoned selection, not a universal verdict.
How these Macbeth films are ranked
The list weighs how much of Shakespeare’s language and plot each film retains, the director’s cinematic invention, lead performances, visual and sound design, and the intensity of its violence. The films do not aim for the same effect: some are spare and abstract, others theatrical and eerie or graphic and naturalistic.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Macbeth - BLURAY, Digital HD | $9.98 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
![Macbeth [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51cjJM4yNGL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Macbeth [Blu-ray] | $32.28 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
![Macbeth (Special Edition) [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/516nkyIDNyL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Macbeth (Special Edition) [Blu-ray] | $14.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
![Lady Macbeth [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51M9oukNVRL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Lady Macbeth [Blu-ray] | $27.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
![Macbeth [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51wFPNEl67L._SL160_.jpg)
|
Macbeth [Blu-ray] | $17.14 | Buy on Amazon |
The five best Macbeth movie adaptations
1. Throne of Blood (1957), directed by Akira Kurosawa
Kurosawa’s relocation of Macbeth to feudal Japan is the most complete transformation on this list—and the strongest choice if you want an adaptation that thinks cinematically rather than simply staging the play. Noh conventions shape its eerie atmosphere, while warring barons and the forest’s supernatural presence give the tragedy a distinct visual world. The British Film Institute notes that Washizu may be understood as following a violent precedent set by his lord, complicating the play’s familiar pattern of rebellion and regicide. A Guardian critic has called it possibly the best Shakespeare film; that is one critic’s judgment, not a settled ranking. British Film Institute; The Guardian.
Anthology Film Archives lists its screening print at 110 minutes on 35mm, in Japanese with English subtitles. Those are archive program details, not a guarantee of the runtime or format of every home release. Anthology Film Archives.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minute#1 Best Overall
- From the producers of THE KING'S SPEECH comes the feature film adaptation of Shakespeare's play MACBETH about Scottish General Macbeth (Michael Fassbender) whose ambitious wife (Marion Cotillard) urges him to use wicked means in order to gain power of the throne over the sitting king.
2. Macbeth (1971), directed by Roman Polanski
Choose Polanski’s version for a bloody, gritty adaptation that stays close to medieval Scotland and the play’s tragic machinery. Its violence and dramatic intensity are central to its effect, so it is not the gentlest entry point for viewers sensitive to graphic violence. Sony’s synopsis follows the witches’ prophecy through Duncan’s murder, Macbeth’s moral decline, and Lady Macbeth’s guilt. Criterion Collection; Sony Pictures.
Anthology Film Archives lists the film at 140 minutes on 35mm for its screening program; home-release runtimes and formats may differ. Sony identifies a DVD edition, but current availability and regional compatibility can vary. Anthology Film Archives; Sony Pictures.
Rank #2
3. The Tragedy of Macbeth (2021), directed by Joel Coen
Coen’s film is the pick for viewers who want formal abstraction and stark monochrome. Denzel Washington and Frances McDormand lead a world of heavy shadows, jutting angles, and bare modernist design. The Los Angeles Times describes the look as expressionist; the Guardian emphasizes the high-contrast black-and-white cinematography and stripped-down setting. Los Angeles Times; The Guardian.
4. Macbeth (2015), directed by Justin Kurzel
Kurzel’s version suits viewers who prefer an atmospheric, contemplative approach, though its mood can divide audiences. The Los Angeles Times describes it as ethereal, dust-filled, and meditative; a Guardian review stresses its blood-and-grime energy. Those contrasting readings capture the film’s tension between reflection and visceral violence. Reactions also differ on how its violence serves Shakespeare’s text. Los Angeles Times; The Guardian.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Rank #3
- This 2-disc Special Edition includes both the original 1948 119-minute cut and the 1950 pared-down 85-minute re-release
5. Macbeth (1948), directed by Orson Welles
Welles’s adaptation is a historically important option for viewers comfortable with an older production style. Its imagery is stark and abstract, and its visual approach includes deep-focus cinematography, deep-space blocking, long takes, and stylized sets. The Los Angeles Times characterizes the version as sparse. Anthology Film Archives lists its archive print at 119 minutes; the film was shot on a 23-day schedule, a production detail rather than a measure of quality. Los Angeles Times; Anthology Film Archives.
Why the adaptations differ so much
Shakespeare’s tragedy offers filmmakers more than one route to the screen. The play was probably written and first performed in late 1606 or early 1607, and the Folger Shakespeare Library identifies Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland as Shakespeare’s primary source. A film can preserve the Scottish setting and much of the dramatic structure, as Polanski does, or translate the story into a different culture and visual language, as Kurosawa does. Coen, meanwhile, makes stark design and monochrome central to the experience. Folger Shakespeare Library.
Rank #4
Which Macbeth adaptation should you watch?
- For the most inventive cinematic transformation: Throne of Blood.
- For a graphic, text-centered tragedy: Polanski’s Macbeth (1971).
- For austere monochrome and formal design: Coen’s The Tragedy of Macbeth.
- For atmosphere that balances meditation with grime: Kurzel’s Macbeth (2015).
- For a stark, historically significant older production: Welles’s Macbeth (1948).
This is a deliberately manageable selection of major feature adaptations, not a complete screen history. Other formats exist: the Folger’s reading guide also discusses a 1978 video version of Trevor Nunn’s stage production. Folger Shakespeare Library.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Factory sealed DVD
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
