The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Alfred Hitchcock gave a direct answer: he shot Psycho (1960) in black and white because of the blood. In his account, the bathtub sequence would have been cut from the film had it been shot in color. The film’s low budget is real context, but it is not the reason Hitchcock himself gave.
What Hitchcock said
In an interview republished by the American Society of Cinematographers, Hitchcock states the reason plainly: “The reason I didn’t do Psycho in color was because of the blood.” He expands on it in the same interview: “With all the blood in that bathtub. I knew very well I’d have had the whole sequence cut out — if it had been filmed in color.”
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
![Psycho (1960) [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/517COyYUtmL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Psycho (1960) [Blu-ray] | $8.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
![Psycho (1960) - 4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray + Digital [4K UHD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51h5dQ+GC5L._SL160_.jpg)
|
Psycho (1960) - 4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray + Digital [4K UHD] | $13.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
![Psycho: Complete 4-Movie Collection [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41TS3UvMW+L._SL160_.jpg)
|
Psycho: Complete 4-Movie Collection [Blu-ray] | $29.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
![Psycho (1960) [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51LBng0H5NL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Psycho (1960) [Blu-ray] | $9.69 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
![Psycho (1960) [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51i9jP0DKpL._SL160_.jpg)
|
Psycho (1960) [Blu-ray] | $19.99 | Buy on Amazon |
Two points about this source matter for accuracy. The ASC republished the interview online, and the original date of the interview is not established in the material available for this article. Hitchcock is also known to have preferred color as a medium, so his choice here reads as a specific response to one scene rather than a general statement of taste.
Why the blood was the problem
The shower murder is the film’s most famous sequence, and its impact depends on the sight of blood running down the drain. In color, that imagery would have been far more graphic than a black-and-white image. Hitchcock’s concern was not that the scene would be unwatchable, but that it would be cut. A censor-trimmed sequence would weaken the film’s central shock, so he removed the variable that made the scene most vulnerable.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute#1 Best Overall
The British Film Institute reports a practical detail about the effect itself. Marli Renfro, who recalled the shooting, said the blood was made from watered-down Hershey’s syrup. This is her recollection as the BFI reports it. It describes how the stage blood was made for the shower scene, not why the whole film was shot in monochrome, and no other syrup brand is established for this production.
The budget context
Economy also shaped the production. Charles Taylor’s essay on Psycho, published in The A List: The National Society of Film Critics’ 100 Essential Films (2002) and hosted by the Library of Congress, reports that the film cost $800,000 and was made with the crew from Alfred Hitchcock Presents. Those facts explain how a film of this scale was made quickly and cheaply. They do not show that cost was the reason for black and white, and Hitchcock’s stated reason is the blood.
The distinction matters because the two explanations are easy to merge. A low-budget shoot and a director’s choice to avoid color can both be true at once. The sources support the first as context and the second as Hitchcock’s explicit explanation.
The shower sequence in numbers
The BFI article also reports production details for the shower scene, attributed to Alexandre O. Philippe’s documentary 78/52, which examines the sequence. These figures describe that one scene, not the whole film.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #3
| Detail | Figure as reported | Source and attribution |
|---|---|---|
| Camera setups | 78 | BFI, 2017, citing the documentary 78/52 |
| Cuts | 52 | BFI, 2017, citing the documentary 78/52 |
| Length of the sequence | About 45 seconds | BFI, 2017, citing the documentary 78/52 |
| Time to film | One week | BFI, 2017, citing the documentary 78/52 |
| Film budget | $800,000 | Charles Taylor (2002), Library of Congress-hosted excerpt |
| Blood mixture | Watered-down Hershey’s syrup | Marli Renfro’s recollection, as reported by the BFI, 2017 |
The contrast between 45 seconds of screen time and a week of shooting shows how much labor went into a short, intense sequence, and why Hitchcock would have been reluctant to lose any of it to censors.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What is and is not established
- Established: Hitchcock’s own stated reason for shooting in black and white was the blood, and he said the bathtub sequence would have been cut in color.
- Established as context: The film was made cheaply, at $800,000, using the crew from a television series.
- Not established: That cost was the reason for black and white. No direct, dated statement from Hitchcock on that point appears in the material used here.
- Not established: The exact date of the republished ASC interview.
For readers who want the director’s explanation in his own words, the ASC interview is the primary source to cite. For the production scale and the shower-scene details, the BFI and Library of Congress-hosted sources cover the rest.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Factory sealed DVD
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
