Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsThe best-documented origin starts with a March 18, 2020 comment by Bill Gates about digital certificates for COVID-19 testing, recovery, or vaccination. The next day, a website recast that idea as a plan for microchip implants. The story then blended it with separate, pre-pandemic research into a dye-based way to record vaccinations. Fact-checkers found no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines contained tracking microchips.
The first leap: from digital certificates to implanted microchips
On March 18, 2020, Bill Gates wrote in a Reddit Ask Me Anything: “Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.” FactCheck.org’s account says Gates was discussing efforts to expand home-based, self-administered testing. The Gates Foundation told the outlet that the certificates were part of a digital platform.
On March 19, Biohackinfo.com published the headline “Bill Gates will use microchip implants to fight coronavirus,” describing the certificates as implantable quantum-dot tattoos. FactCheck.org characterized the claim as a mash-up of unrelated projects: Gates had mentioned digital records, not an implant.
How the claim spread in early April 2020
The claim moved from social-media groups into broader political audiences. FactCheck.org reported that Newsmax correspondent Emerald Robinson posted about vaccine tracking on April 6, and Fox News host Laura Ingraham asked Attorney General William Barr about tracking mechanisms on April 8.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →#1 Best Overall
The Biohackinfo story had more than 13,000 Facebook shares by the time FactCheck.org published its report on April 14, 2020. The outlet also reported more than 1.8 million YouTube views for a video based on the story. Both figures are historical CrowdTangle snapshots cited in that 2020 report, not current totals.
The separate MIT research that became part of the story
A second strand involved research into a dye-based vaccination marker. According to PolitiFact, the MIT project began in July 2016 and its study was published in 2019—before COVID-19 emerged. The proposed dye was intended to help identify vaccination status in places where paper records were difficult to maintain. It was not a COVID-19 vaccine chip and was not designed to monitor people’s movements.
Rank #2
Kevin McHugh, a Rice University bioengineering professor and researcher on the dye study, told FactCheck.org that the markings were developed to provide a vaccination record and had “no ability to track anyone’s movements.” He said they could provide only limited, non-personalized data locally, required direct line-of-sight imaging from less than a foot away, and could not enable remote or continuous tracking. FactCheck.org’s report quotes his explanation.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Two later misunderstandings: a BBC article and a vial tag
The BBC travel article
A speculative travel article about a possible subdermal dye record was misread as saying that COVID-19 vaccines would contain microchips. Full Fact explains that the dye discussed was not a microchip. Full Fact’s fact check addresses the misreading.
Recommended Free Tools
The RFID tag on vaccine packaging
A 2020 video also turned a proposed RFID tag attached to the end of a plastic vaccine vial into a claim about an implanted tracking chip. FactCheck.org reported that the tag was for identifying dose information, could not be injected into or track a patient, and that Pfizer and Moderna were not using the described syringes at the time of the report. The report concerns that 2020 proposal; it does not establish what packaging is used today. FactCheck.org explains the distinction.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
What the different technologies actually meant
| Claim or technology | What it referred to | What it did not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Digital certificates | A digital record related to testing, recovery, or vaccination status, as described in Gates’s March 18, 2020 comment and the Gates Foundation’s explanation to FactCheck.org. | An implanted chip; Gates’s remark described no such device. |
| MIT dye-based marker | Pre-pandemic research into a way to record vaccination status where paper records were hard to maintain. | A COVID-19 vaccine component or a means of tracking movement. |
| RFID vial tag | A proposed tag attached to vaccine packaging to identify dose information, as described in FactCheck.org’s December 2020 report. | A device injected into a patient or a patient-tracking implant. |
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
