What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Yes—at the time, it was framed as a theatrical way to make a point about violence, the central subject of A History of Violence. At the film’s September 10, 2005, Toronto International Film Festival press conference, Ed Harris pounded the table and threw or smashed a glass after a question about violence in everyday life. A contemporaneous account said he later indicated the outburst was “all in good fun.” The available reporting does not establish that Harris later gave a separate first-person explanation of the incident.
What happened at the TIFF press conference?
Reuters reported that the press conference took place on September 10, 2005, as A History of Violence and Brokeback Mountain appeared at TIFF. When the moderator asked about the idea that violence lies close to the surface of everyday life, Harris pounded the table three times and smashed a glass against a wall. Reuters described the gesture as a way to draw attention to the film. Reuters’ contemporaneous report
![A History of Violence (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/511lmFIlbvL._SL160_.jpg)
![American History X/ A History of Violence [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61aikvW+cHL._SL160_.jpg)
![American History X / A History of Violence / True Romance (Triple Feature) [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51bbpmfZCIL._SL160_.jpg)
A contemporaneous JAM! Movies account describes Harris banging his fist on the table and throwing a glass behind him. It attributes these words to him: “What is that? What is violence? What is it? You know, that’s what the movie is about!” The account says the event soon turned cheerful and that Harris indicated the outburst was “all in good fun.” Those details are preserved in a fan-site reproduction of the original report, rather than independently verified against a recording. The reproduced JAM! Movies account
The accounts agree on the essentials—a forceful table gesture and a glass thrown or smashed in response to a question about violence—but differ on exactly what happened to the glass and where it went. The clearest description is therefore to attribute the specific version to the report that gives it.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minute#1 Best Overall
Was it a real meltdown?
The contemporaneous coverage supports reading the episode as a dramatic illustration of the film’s subject, followed by a lighthearted explanation at the event. It does not establish that Harris experienced a genuine breakdown. “Bizarre meltdown” is a sensational characterization, not a documented account of his state of mind.
A later Global News retrospective also recalls Harris slamming the table, shouting “What is this?” and throwing a glass over his shoulder, describing the act as an attempt to make a point about violence. That account corroborates the broad outline, but the contemporaneous reports are the stronger evidence for how the moment was framed at the time. Global News’ retrospective
Rank #2
![American History X / A History of Violence [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51qYs4w2WML._SL160_.jpg)
- Blu-ray
- Multiple Formats, Blu-ray, NTSC
- English (Published), English (Original Language)
- 2
- 215
Did Harris explain it later?
The reporting available here does not establish a later, verified first-person statement in which Harris revisited the incident. The explanation that can be supported is the one reported at the press conference: the gesture dramatized the question of what violence is, and Harris later indicated that it was in good fun. There is no basis here to say he later apologized, regretted it, or offered a different account.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why the gesture fit the film’s subject
TIFF’s Canadian Film Encyclopedia identifies A History of Violence as a 2005 David Cronenberg film starring Harris as Carl Fogarty, adapted from the 1997 graphic novel by John Wagner and Vince Locke. It describes the film as exploring psychological relationships to violence, persecution, family, sex, and domestic life. That context helps explain why a question about everyday violence was relevant to the panel, though it cannot by itself establish Harris’s intentions. TIFF Canadian Film Encyclopedia entry
Rank #3
In a separate contemporaneous account, Cronenberg resisted presenting the film as a lesson with a settled answer: “It’s not as though I have a message, having solved any problem and I’m now telling you about it.” That comment concerns the film’s meaning, not Harris’s outburst. The Museum of the Moving Image records Cronenberg speaking there on September 13, 2005, shortly after the film’s Toronto premiere; that record supports the timing and festival context, not a conclusion about Harris’s state of mind. Contemporaneous account quoting Cronenberg · Museum of the Moving Image event record
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
