Rhaka Khan’s $3 billion lawsuit naming Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson was dismissed in 2023, according to published reports. The rulings addressed pleading and venue problems, followed by a reported dismissal for failure to state a claim; they did not establish that Johnson kidnapped anyone or resolve the truth of the allegations.
What was the Dwayne Johnson $3 billion kidnapping lawsuit?
Trenesha Biggers, a former professional wrestler known by the ring name Rhaka Khan, filed the federal case in October 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, according to PWInsider. The complaint sought $3 billion in damages and named approximately 1,000 individuals and entities, including actor Dwayne Johnson.
Biggers alleged a broad conspiracy involving kidnapping and other wrongdoing. Those were allegations in her complaint, not findings by the court. The published accounts of the dismissals do not report a determination that Johnson or any other named defendant committed kidnapping.
Why was Rhaka Khan’s lawsuit dismissed?
The June 2023 ruling: pleading and venue
On June 12, 2023, the court dismissed claims arising in New York because the complaint did not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, which requires a clear, concise statement of a claim. It dismissed claims arising outside the Southern District of New York for improper venue, without prejudice to filing them in the proper venues. The court gave Biggers 30 days to amend qualifying claims arising within the district, as reported by PWInsider.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →#1 Best Overall
That order addressed how the case was pleaded and where claims could be brought. It was not a ruling that the alleged events had or had not happened.
The reported October 2023 ruling: failure to state a claim
LegalClarity reports that the court dismissed Biggers’s second amended complaint on October 10, 2023, for failure to state a claim. The explainer says this followed another opportunity to amend and a direction that the amended filing be no more than 20 pages and comply with Rule 8. It also reports that the court denied a recusal motion.
The October result is reported by LegalClarity; the underlying dismissal order is not available in the sources cited here. The procedural account therefore should not be read as a finding about the truth of the kidnapping allegations or the liability of the named defendants.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the dismissal does—and does not—mean
The two reported stages are distinct. The June order cited Rule 8 defects for New York claims and improper venue for claims arising elsewhere, while allowing a limited opportunity to amend local claims. The later dismissal was reported as a failure-to-state-a-claim ruling on the second amended complaint. Neither description establishes that Johnson kidnapped anyone, nor does it amount to a finding that the alleged conspiracy was true.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteThe available reporting establishes these dismissal outcomes, but does not independently establish the case’s current docket status beyond them.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
