October DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsWindows FixRecommendedWindows errors stealing your time? Find the fix fastScan stability, cleanup and performance issues.Fix NowOctober DealsAmazon USDeal season is back - check today's better picksAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.See Picks×
Skip to content
DocumentaryTube
Admit one · Blog

When Metallica Sued Napster: The 2000 Lawsuit and 2001 Settlement

Metallica sued Napster on April 13, 2000, naming three universities as well. The separate case settled in July 2001, with financial terms undisclosed.
Opened Runtime2 min Written byDocumentaryTube Team
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Metallica sued Napster on April 13, 2000, over the file-sharing service’s role in users finding and exchanging MP3s. The band also named three universities in its complaint. The separate case ended in a settlement in July 2001; its financial terms were not disclosed.

When did Metallica sue Napster?

The complaint was filed on April 13, 2000, according to contemporaneous reporting. That was more than 26 years before October 8, 2026—not “15 years ago today,” a phrase tied to an older publication date.

The complaint named Napster, the University of Southern California, Yale University and Indiana University. It alleged copyright infringement, unlawful use of a digital audio interface device, and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). These were allegations in the complaint, not findings that the defendants had committed those violations.

Why did Metallica sue Napster?

Napster let users search an index for MP3 files stored on other users’ computers. That setup put the service at the center of disputes over both users’ copying and whether Napster could be held legally responsible for facilitating infringement. The district-court opinion in the separate recording-company case describes the system and the claims against the service.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Metallica’s lawsuit was part of a wider conflict over online music sharing, but it was not the original record-industry case against Napster. The distinction matters: the plaintiffs, proceedings and outcomes were not the same.

How was Metallica’s case different from the record-company case?

Major record companies and musical-work owners brought a separate federal action against Napster in 2000. In that case, the district court issued a preliminary injunction on July 26, 2000. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the injunction in part in February 2001, concluding that the plaintiffs had shown a likelihood of success sufficient to support preliminary relief.

Those injunction decisions concerned the recording-company litigation. They were not a final judgment in Metallica’s separate lawsuit and should not be described as the outcome of the band’s case.

What happened to Metallica’s lawsuit?

Napster settled its copyright suits with Metallica and Dr. Dre in July 2001. Wired reported that the financial terms were not disclosed. Its account said the arrangement would allow some Metallica songs to be traded on Napster if the company launched a legal business model. That conditional arrangement was not a damages award to Metallica.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

After the settlement, Metallica drummer Lars Ulrich said, as quoted by Wired: “I think we’ve resolved this in a way that works for fans, recording artists and songwriters alike.”

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What did Napster say when Metallica filed?

In April 2000, Napster acting CEO Eileen Richardson criticized the band’s management for filing without first contacting the company. Wired reported her response: “We regret that the band’s management saw fit to issue a press release — and to file a lawsuit — without even attempting to contact Napster…. Many bands who have approached us, learned about Napster and how to leverage what we offer, understand the value of what we do.” This was Napster’s response at the time, not a finding by a court.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More from the Screening Room

  1. Does NEON Have a New Horror Movie It Won’t Show Us? What’s VerifiedAdmit one · BlogDoes NEON Have a New Horror Movie It Won't Show Us? What's VerifiedOpened09 OCT 2026Runtime1 min
  2. What the Official NCIS: Origins Trailer Reveals About Young GibbsAdmit one · BlogWhat the Official NCIS: Origins Trailer Reveals About Young GibbsOpened09 OCT 2026Runtime2 min
  3. What Makes a Translation Great? Ten Literary Translators Weigh InAdmit one · BlogWhat Makes a Translation Great? Ten Literary Translators Weigh InOpened09 OCT 2026Runtime3 min
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?Free driver scan
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They SpreadFree repair scan

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.