Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsA Los Angeles Superior Court judge reportedly entered a default judgment for landlord Eric T. Goldie on March 9, 2026, in an eviction case involving actor Mickey Rourke. News reports say the ruling awarded the landlord possession of the rental property and terminated the rental agreement. The reports describe a possession judgment, not an award of unpaid rent.
What did the court decide?
The Los Angeles Times and The Independent reported that the court entered a default judgment in Goldie’s favor. The judgment was described as giving the landlord possession of the Los Angeles property and ending Rourke’s rental agreement. The reports were published March 10–11, 2026; the underlying court docket was not independently reviewed for this account.
In an unlawful detainer case, “default” means the case proceeded after the defendant did not respond or appear within the required period, according to the reporting. That procedural outcome should not be read as a finding on every dispute between a tenant and landlord.
What did the landlord allege?
The Los Angeles Times reported that Goldie’s complaint alleged $59,100 in unpaid rent. The property was described as renting for $7,000 a month. The Times also reported that Rourke received a three-day notice to pay rent or leave on December 18, 2025, and that the landlord filed the unlawful detainer complaint on December 29. These are reported allegations and case details, not independently reviewed filings.
#1 Best Overall
Why did Rourke say he withheld rent?
Rourke said he stopped paying because he believed serious problems in the home had not been fixed. He cited rodent and plumbing issues and told the Los Angeles Times: “Withholding rent was not a decision I made lightly.” He also said he could not keep paying for a house he considered to be in poor condition after attempts to get the problems corrected. That is Rourke’s explanation; the reports do not establish that the court ruled on the home’s condition or his habitability claims.
Did the judgment award the landlord $59,100?
The Los Angeles Times characterized the judgment as addressing possession rather than awarding monetary damages in that action. The $59,100 figure was the landlord’s reported claim for unpaid rent; it should not be described as money the judge awarded. The reporting does not establish whether rent or habitability disputes were resolved in a separate proceeding.
What is known about the case timeline?
- December 18, 2025: The Los Angeles Times reported Rourke was served a three-day notice to pay or vacate.
- December 29, 2025: The Times reported Goldie filed an unlawful detainer complaint alleging $59,100 in unpaid rent.
- March 9, 2026: The court reportedly entered the default judgment granting possession and terminating the rental agreement.
- March 10–11, 2026: The Los Angeles Times and The Independent published reports on the ruling.
What happened after the March ruling?
The cited March reports do not establish whether the judgment was later enforced, appealed, or followed by a change in occupancy. They therefore do not confirm the property’s current status.
Quick Recap
Sources
- Los Angeles Times, March 10, 2026 (updated March 12): report on the unpaid-rent allegation, notice, Rourke’s explanation, and possession judgment.
- The Independent, March 11, 2026: report on the rental agreement and court outcome.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →
