Recommended Free Tools
Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios sought at least $400 million from Blake Lively and others, accusing them of taking creative control of It Ends With Us and damaging Baldoni’s reputation. The court dismissed their amended complaint in June 2025; the $400 million was a demand, not an award. Taylor Swift was mentioned in the dispute but was not named as a defendant.
What did Baldoni and Wayfarer accuse Blake Lively of?
In the complaint filed on January 16, 2025, Baldoni and the other Wayfarer plaintiffs alleged that Lively and people around her seized creative control of It Ends With Us and carried out a campaign that harmed Baldoni’s reputation. Those claims were the plaintiffs’ account of the dispute, not established facts.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
It Ends with Us - Blu-ray + Digital | $17.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
![It Ends With Us [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41NBzoQHIzL._SL160_.jpg)
|
It Ends With Us [Blu-ray] | $18.80 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
It Ends With Us | Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni | $21.32 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Safe Haven (Blu-ray / DVD + Digital Copy) | $8.12 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
![THE FINEST HOURS (BLU-RAY) - V [2016] [Region A & B & C]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61TsfFEX7KL._SL160_.jpg)
|
THE FINEST HOURS (BLU-RAY) - V [2016] [Region A & B & C] | $87.99 | Buy on Amazon |
The complaint asserted civil extortion, defamation, false light, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, intentional interference with contractual relations, and intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage. The defendants named were Lively, Ryan Reynolds, publicist Leslie Sloane, and Vision PR.
Why was Taylor Swift mentioned, and was she sued?
Swift was not a defendant in the Wayfarer lawsuit. She entered public coverage because Baldoni’s side alleged that Lively invoked her friendship with Swift and Reynolds during a disagreement about script changes and creative control. That allegation does not establish that Swift pressured anyone or took part in the alleged conduct.
#1 Best Overall
- IT ENDS WITH US tells the empowering story of Lily Bloom. Grappling with a painful past, Lily embarks on a new life in Boston and opens her own flower shop. After falling in love with Ryle, Lily begins to see sides of him that remind her of her dangerous father. With the support of her friends and allies, Lily must find her own strength to break the pattern or the pattern will break her.
A January 2026 filing included text messages between Lively and Swift, as reported by ABC News. The messages drew renewed attention to their relationship and the surrounding dispute, but a private conversation by itself does not decide whether either side’s broader allegations are true or create legal liability for Swift.
How did the lawsuits and court proceedings unfold?
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| December 20, 2024 | Lively filed an administrative complaint with the California Civil Rights Department alleging sexual harassment and retaliation connected to the film and its marketing, according to the court’s later case history. |
| December 31, 2024 | Lively filed a federal action asserting sexual harassment, retaliation, contract, emotional-distress, and false-light claims. These were her allegations, as summarized in the court’s case history. |
| January 16, 2025 | Wayfarer and associated plaintiffs filed their action against Lively, Reynolds, Sloane, and Vision PR. |
| June 9, 2025 | Judge Lewis J. Liman granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended Wayfarer complaint. The court allowed a further amendment only for specified contract and interference claims, with a June 23 deadline. |
| By August 2026 | According to the court’s account, Wayfarer had not filed a further amended complaint. |
| May 2026 | The Associated Press reported that the parties settled the remaining claims in Lively’s action. The reviewed sources do not state the full settlement terms. |
| June 12, 2026 | The court granted Lively fees and costs under California Civil Code § 47.1 and denied treble and punitive damages. |
| August 26, 2026 | Judge Liman ordered $363,245.40 in attorneys’ fees and $44,206.35 in costs for Lively. |
What did the dismissal decide—and what did it not decide?
The dismissal concerned the legal sufficiency of the amended complaint. It was not a finding that every event described by either side had or had not happened. In the June 9, 2025 opinion, Judge Liman wrote: “At this stage of proceedings, the Court has not considered whether the allegations in the Amended Complaint are true.”
Rank #2
- dvd, blu ray, film, movie
The court gave the plaintiffs a narrow opportunity to amend specified contract and interference claims, but the later court account says no further complaint was filed. The ruling therefore should not be recast either as proof of the Wayfarer plaintiffs’ accusations or as a trial verdict resolving all disputed conduct.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How should the settlement and fee award be understood?
The Associated Press reported a settlement of the remaining claims in Lively’s action, but the available sources do not establish its terms. The fee and cost order is a separate court ruling in that case; it is not damages awarded to Lively on Wayfarer’s dismissed $400 million demand.
Quick Recap
Rank #3
- Blake Lively, Blu-ray Movies, Blu-ray TV Shows
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
