Joyce Carol Oates did not name Elon Musk in her November 8, 2025 post. She criticized the public persona of an unnamed, very wealthy man for seeming not to show interest in ordinary sources of beauty and meaning. News coverage understood the allusion as Musk; he replied by calling her post false and attacking her character and writing. Calling the exchange a Musk “owned” moment or saying he was “mad online” is interpretation, not a verifiable outcome or account of his state of mind.
What did Joyce Carol Oates say about Elon Musk?
In a post on November 8, 2025, Oates described a very wealthy man who, she suggested, rarely showed public appreciation for the things many people value: nature, pets, films, music, books, family achievements, condolences, sports and history. She wrote that he seemed “totally uneducated, uncultured,” and contrasted his apparent lack of visible interest with the possibility that people with less money might have greater access to beauty and meaning.
Vanity Fair quoted Oates’s post at length and reported the subsequent exchange: Vanity Fair’s November 14, 2025 account.
Did Joyce Carol Oates actually name Elon Musk?
No. Oates’s initial post did not name Musk. Contemporary coverage interpreted the unnamed man as Musk, and Oates later clarified that she had not stated a name and had been thinking of an emblematic figure made possible by great wealth. That distinction matters: the post was an implied criticism, not a direct named accusation. Oates’s later clarification, as reported in coverage.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →#1 Best Overall
What did Elon Musk say in response?
Vanity Fair reported that Musk called Oates’s post “demonstrably false.” He then wrote that she was “a liar” who delighted in being mean and was “not a good human.” He also attacked her writing, saying that eating sawdust would be more enjoyable than reading what he called her “laboriously pretentious drivel.” Those are Musk’s words, as quoted by the outlet, not established descriptions of Oates or her work.
The same report says Musk later recommended listening to Homer’s Iliad at 1.25 speed while linking to The Odyssey; that post was quickly deleted. Oates continued posting about him, writing: “That’s because when he gets there, he has brought his own self along,” and adding that any club he was invited to join would be “devalued by the invitation.” Vanity Fair reported these posts and quotations.
Rank #2
Why did Oates criticize him?
Her stated point was about what a person’s public posts appear to reveal—or fail to reveal—about their interests. She listed everyday cultural and personal experiences, from enjoying a pet or a book to mourning someone’s death, as signs of a connection to ordinary life. The criticism rested on her reading of a public persona; it was not proof that Musk privately lacks those interests.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Was Musk “owned,” or was he “mad online”?
Those phrases are colorful headline judgments. The record establishes a pointed post by Oates, Musk’s critical replies and a widely covered social-media exchange. It does not establish a winner, nor can the posts alone establish Musk’s internal emotional state. A factual description is that he responded with insults and criticism; “owned” and “mad online” are interpretations of the episode. Other contemporary coverage framed the exchange as viral, but engagement figures are not needed to explain what happened.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
