ADOR announced on December 29, 2025, that it had terminated Danielle’s exclusive contract, saying it considered it difficult for her to continue as both a NewJeans member and an ADOR artist. The next day, Yonhap reported that the label had filed a damages suit against Danielle, former ADOR chief Min Hee-jin and one of Danielle’s family members, seeking about 43.1 billion won. That amount was a claim, not a court award. The court ruling on NewJeans’ group contracts, ADOR’s later decision about Danielle and the damages case are separate parts of the controversy.
What happened to Danielle’s ADOR contract?
On December 29, 2025, ADOR said it had notified Danielle that her exclusive contract was terminated. The company said it had decided it would be difficult for her to continue both as a member of NewJeans and as an artist at ADOR. That was the label’s stated reason for its decision; it was not a court order removing Danielle from the group.
The announcement came amid a wider dispute over NewJeans’ exclusive contracts. The developments that followed involved separate decisions and legal steps:
| Date | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| October 30, 2025 | The Korea Times reported that the Seoul Central District Court ruled that all five members had to honor their exclusive contracts with ADOR through 2029. | This concerned the group’s contracts. It was not the later decision by ADOR to terminate Danielle’s agreement. |
| November 12, 2025 | Contemporary reports said Haerin and Hyein would return to ADOR. Minji, Hanni and Danielle indicated through their legal representative that they wanted to return; ADOR said discussions were continuing. | The members’ reported positions and the label’s discussions preceded the termination announcement. |
| December 29, 2025 | ADOR said Hanni would stay, discussions with Minji continued, and Danielle’s contract had been terminated. ADOR also said it intended to pursue legal measures involving Min Hee-jin and one of Danielle’s family members. | These were ADOR’s announcements and intentions. |
| December 30, 2025 | Yonhap reported that ADOR filed a damages suit against Danielle, Min Hee-jin and one family member. | A lawsuit starts a legal claim; filing it does not establish that the defendants are liable. |
Why did ADOR say it terminated Danielle’s contract?
ADOR’s stated explanation was that it believed Danielle could not continue in both roles—NewJeans member and ADOR artist. The Korea JoongAng Daily reproduced the label’s statement: “We decided that it would be difficult for Danielle to continue both as a member of NewJeans and an artist at ADOR, and we have notified her that the contract has been terminated.”
#1 Best Overall
![NewJeans 2nd EP `Get Up'[Bunny Beach Bag ver.]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/419DT+-gqrL._SL160_.jpg)
- Known as the K-Pop girl group that's taken the world by a storm and broken world records, NewJeans is back with their 2nd EP titled `Get Up
ADOR also accused a family member and former CEO Min Hee-jin of bearing responsibility for the dispute and delaying the members’ return. Those are allegations attributed to the company, not findings established by the reporting available here.
What is the 43.1 billion won lawsuit?
Yonhap reported on December 30, 2025, that ADOR sought approximately 43.1 billion won—about US$29.7 million—from Danielle, Min Hee-jin and one of Danielle’s family members. The figure describes the compensation ADOR requested, as reported by Yonhap in 2025. It is not a fine imposed on Danielle or an amount a court had awarded.
Rank #2
- Will count towards the Korea Hanteo, Gaon Charts and K-Charts
- 100% Original & Brand New Item Sealed
- Made in Korea
The fact that Danielle was named in the suit does not by itself settle the label’s allegations or establish responsibility. The claim must be distinguished from a judicial finding, and the parties’ accounts should not be treated as if a court had accepted one.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What was reported about the later hearing?
A KBS News result dated July 2, 2026, summarized arguments reported from a hearing in the damages litigation. According to that summary, ADOR argued that Danielle alone had undertaken independent commercial activity during the contract conflict; Danielle’s side disputed that account. These are competing positions reported in connection with the hearing, not established findings about what happened.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Rank #3
- Starting with their debut EP, the 5-member girl group NewJeans have taken the world by a storm & for the first time NewJeans' 1st EP `New Jeans' CD is available worldwide
The material available through that KBS report does not establish a judgment, settlement, appeal or later disposition. The case’s status after July 2, 2026, is therefore unverified here.
Quick Recap
How to separate the three legal issues
- The group contract ruling: The Korea Times reported that the Seoul Central District Court required all five members to honor their exclusive contracts with ADOR through 2029.
- Danielle’s contract termination: ADOR announced its own decision on December 29, 2025, and gave its view of why continued work was difficult. Do not describe that as a court-ordered removal.
- The damages suit: Yonhap reported that ADOR filed the case the following day and sought compensation. A claim is not a judgment, and the later KBS account describes disputed arguments rather than a ruling on the merits.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
