Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said investigators believe “something occurred” on January 11, 2026, citing the FBI’s analysis of equipment and digital material. He did not say publicly what happened that day, and the statement does not establish that a crime occurred or that the date was connected to Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance.
What the sheriff said about January 11
In comments made March 23 and reported by KOLD the following day, Nanos said: “We do believe that something occurred on Jan. 11 and that’s with the FBI’s analysis of the equipment and digital stuff they’ve done.” The sheriff identified a date investigators considered significant and attributed their belief to FBI analysis; he did not describe the underlying event or the material analyzed. KOLD’s March 24 report
How January 11 fits the disappearance timeline
January 11 is three weeks before January 31, the date AP identifies as Guthrie’s last-seen date. AP reports she was reported missing on February 1. Calling January 11 “three weeks before her disappearance” refers to the interval before the reported last-seen date; it does not confirm that the disappearance itself happened on January 11 or establish an event on that date.
- January 11: The date Nanos said investigators believed something occurred.
- January 31: Guthrie was last seen, according to AP’s timeline. She took an Uber to a family dinner at 5:32 p.m. and was dropped off at her Tucson-area home at 9:48 p.m. by a family member.
- February 1: AP reports that the doorbell camera was disconnected at 1:47 a.m.; its software detected movement at 2:12 a.m.; and Guthrie’s pacemaker app disconnected from her phone at 2:28 a.m. Her family checked on her and called 911 late that morning after learning she had missed church. These timeline details do not explain the January 11 lead.
On March 22, Guthrie’s family urged the public to revisit January 11, January 31 and February 1, including any camera footage, notes, messages, observations or conversations that might seem significant in retrospect. AP’s April 6 timeline summarizes that appeal and the reported chronology.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
What the January 11 statement does—and does not—establish
The public reporting cited here does not identify the specific equipment or digital records behind the investigators’ focus on January 11, explain what those records showed, or clarify what Nanos meant by “something.” It also does not establish that the date was connected to Guthrie’s disappearance. The statement is an investigative belief reported by the sheriff, not a public account of a confirmed incident.
The FBI’s February 11 case notice names the FBI Phoenix Field Office and Pima County Sheriff’s Department as investigators and says Guthrie was last seen at her residence in Tucson’s Catalina Foothills on January 31.
Rank #2
How to share information and avoid scams
Anyone with information about the case can call the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324) or submit a tip at tips.fbi.gov, as directed in the FBI notice. AP reported on September 29 that investigators considered a recently surfaced possible ransom message not credible and urged people to report messages to law enforcement and watch for scammers. That is a dated update, not confirmation of the case’s status after September 29. AP’s September 29 report
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
