The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →I.M. Lall was an Indian Civil Service judge whose purported dismissal from service was declared void and inoperative by the Privy Council in 1948. The ruling rested on a failure to provide the procedural opportunity required by the Government of India Act, 1935; it did not decide that every allegation against him was false. Chander M. Lall, his grandson, tells the story in At the Pleasure of His Majesty: IM Lall and the Case That Shook the Crown.
Who was I.M. Lall?
Inder Mohan Lall was an Indian Civil Service (ICS) officer and judge. He served as a sessions judge in several locations, including Lahore and Ambala, and became permanent in July 1934, according to an excerpt from the book published by Scroll on March 13, 2024. Read the Scroll excerpt.
The case that made him notable concerned his removal from the ICS. Its central legal question was not whether every accusation made during the disciplinary process was true, but whether the authorities had followed the procedure required before dismissing him.
What led to the dispute?
The book excerpt describes a conflict involving subordinate court appointments and staff discipline. Lall appointed his wife’s nephew, Sunder Das, to subordinate court service. Later disputes concerned Das’s appointment and confirmation, disciplinary action against other staff, and allegations of favoritism and victimization. An inquiry considered allegations against Lall, as recounted in a reproduced account of the judgment.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
Those allegations and disciplinary findings form the human and administrative background to the litigation. They should be kept distinct from the Privy Council’s eventual holding about the legality of the dismissal procedure.
What did the Privy Council decide?
After Lall’s removal was ordered in 1940, his case passed through the Lahore High Court and the Federal Court before reaching the Privy Council. In High Commissioner for India v. I.M. Lall (1948), the Privy Council stated that “the order of August 10, 1940, purporting to dismiss the respondent from the Indian Civil Service was void and inoperative”. The judgment passage is available here through a secondary reproduction, rather than an official court repository: the reproduced disposition.
The court’s conclusion was procedural and specific: the required opportunity under Section 240(3) of the Government of India Act, 1935 had not been provided. The disposition also said Lall remained a member of the ICS when he brought suit in July 1942. It established that the purported dismissal was legally ineffective under the applicable statutory procedure; it is more precise than describing the case as a general judicial defeat of the British Empire.
How does the case relate to Article 311?
Article 311 of the Constitution of India provides procedural protections for civil servants facing dismissal, removal or reduction in rank. Accounts of the book often connect Lall’s case with that later constitutional safeguard because of the historical continuity in protections for public servants.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Rank #3
- Used Book in Good Condition
The distinction in dates and law matters: the Privy Council decided Lall’s case in 1948 under Section 240(3) of the Government of India Act, 1935. It did not apply Article 311, which belongs to the Constitution of India. The case is part of the earlier legal history; it is not a ruling under the later constitutional provision. The reproduced judgment and Article 311’s text and context show the distinction.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What is the book about?
At the Pleasure of His Majesty: IM Lall and the Case That Shook the Crown is by Chander M. Lall, I.M. Lall’s grandson. Its account covers Lall’s ICS career and legal battle, as well as his family’s experience during Partition. Scroll published an excerpt on March 13, 2024: “How an Indian civil servant challenged his dismissal by the British — and won”.
A listing gives February 5, 2024 as the Kindle edition’s publication date. Edition details and availability can change, so check the listing for current information: Kindle edition listing.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
