Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11The Supreme Court’s July 9, 2025 response to a bid to stop Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder was not a final ruling on the film’s content. The Court declined to urgently list accused Mohammed Javed’s plea before the planned July 11 release; on July 25, it declined to extend a release stay and directed objectors to seek further relief from the Delhi High Court.
What the Supreme Court said on July 9
Mohammed Javed, an accused in the 2022 Kanhaiya Lal murder case, asked the Supreme Court to urgently consider his challenge to the film’s planned July 11 release. A contemporaneous India Today report quoted the bench: “Mention before court concerned on reopening. Let it be released.” The Court declined urgent listing and asked Javed to mention the matter after the court reopened.
![Today You Die [DVD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51t-2kWa1wL._SL160_.jpg)
That was a procedural response to an urgent-listing request, not a final merits judgment endorsing the film, deciding whether its contents were accurate or lawful, or resolving whether it could prejudice a trial.
Javed’s fair-trial objection
Javed argued that the film presented a one-sided account and could affect his pending criminal trial. The reproduced Supreme Court order records his contention that, while witnesses were still being examined before the Special NIA Court in Jaipur, release of the movie could affect proceedings and cause prejudice to the accused. That is Javed’s argument as recorded in the order; it is not a court finding that the film would have that effect.
#1 Best Overall
A separate challenge and government review
Javed’s fair-trial argument was distinct from a separate Delhi High Court challenge brought by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind. India Today reported that the organisation alleged the film was communally divisive, and that the Central Board of Film Certification told the High Court certain offending portions had been removed. These were separate objections and statements, not findings made by the Supreme Court on July 9.
The reproduced order says the Delhi High Court had stayed release while the Central Government considered a revision petition under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting formed a committee to examine that petition. The Supreme Court deferred further hearing while the review proceeded and allowed Javed to appear before the committee.
Rank #2
![Legal Eagles [DVD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51u90akoV9L._SL160_.jpg)
- Factory sealed DVD
What changed on July 25
On July 25, the Supreme Court declined to extend the stay on release and directed those opposing the film to approach the Delhi High Court for further relief. The Indian Express reported that the Ministry’s review committee had recommended allowing release subject to changes, including a new disclaimer.
The July 25 direction did not decide the film’s truthfulness or social impact. It sent objectors to the High Court for any further relief, following the review process. The available reporting here does not establish the film’s eventual theatrical or other distribution status after that date.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteQuick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
Rank #3
- 2 DVD Set, 4 Hours 20 Minutes
- Features the Great Modern Masters of Indian Music
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
