Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ashley Repp in 2026, affirming dismissal of Nick Carter’s counterclaims against her under the state’s anti-SLAPP law. That decision was not a trial verdict establishing every accusation against Carter. A separate 2025 Nevada appeal involving Melissa and Jerome Schuman went the other way on a different procedural question: Carter’s counterclaims against them were allowed to proceed past his anti-SLAPP motion.
What the Nevada Supreme Court decided in Ashley Repp’s case
In Carter v. Repp, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of Carter’s counterclaims against Repp under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP law. Anti-SLAPP procedures allow courts to assess certain claims targeting protected speech at an early stage. The appeal concerned the legal viability of Carter’s claims against Repp and the court’s analysis of her statements—not a jury’s determination of all the underlying allegations. Read the Nevada Supreme Court opinion.
The opinion says Carter acknowledged in filings and a sworn declaration that he had sex with Repp in 2003. He maintained that the encounter was consensual and that he believed she was 18; the opinion says Repp was 15 at the time. The court treated Carter’s admission as a narrow judicial admission and concluded the district court did not err in analyzing Repp’s use of “rapist.”
The court separately examined Repp’s use of “serial rapist,” which implicated allegations by other women. It described applying an absolute-truth defense to that phrase as “a much closer call.” But Carter had not shown by clear and convincing evidence that Repp knew those other women’s allegations were false or seriously doubted them. The court therefore affirmed dismissal of his counterclaims against her. It also noted that although the district court had addressed aspects of the defamation claims, Carter did not contest the order’s broader application to his other counterclaims.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →#1 Best Overall
Why the Schuman appeal had a different outcome
The 2025 Nevada Supreme Court decision involving Melissa and Jerome Schuman concerned a separate appeal and a different procedural question. It affirmed the denial of Carter’s anti-SLAPP motion against them. The court said evidence viewed in Carter’s favor at that stage could support a jury finding of actual malice if believed, while emphasizing that the record presented genuine factual disputes the court could not weigh. Read the Nevada Supreme Court opinion involving the Schumans.
That ruling did not find that the Schumans’ statements were false, nor did it establish Carter’s allegations of conspiracy. It meant only that the case could continue past the anti-SLAPP motion on the record and legal question before the court. The Repp and Schuman cases retained separate identities even though consolidation had been considered; the Repp opinion specifically says consolidation did not merge them into one action.
| Case | What the Nevada Supreme Court reviewed | Result at the anti-SLAPP stage |
|---|---|---|
| Carter v. Repp (2026) | Carter’s counterclaims against Repp, including claims related to her statements | Affirmed dismissal of Carter’s counterclaims against Repp |
| Schuman appeal (2025) | Carter’s motion to end the Schumans’ claims against him under anti-SLAPP law | Affirmed denial of Carter’s motion; the disputed claims could proceed |
What these rulings do—and do not—establish
The two appellate outcomes are not contradictory findings about whether the underlying accusations are true. They concern different parties, records, claims, and procedural questions. Neither ruling should be summarized as a jury finding that Carter raped two women, or as proof that every allegation or counterclaim in the related disputes is true.
The Repp opinion explains why rulings in other cases do not automatically determine her case, invoking “the deep-rooted historic tradition that everyone should have his own day in court.” The court’s point was that each case must be considered on its own record and legal issues.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →The separate California case and its reported schedule
A January 2026 report said Melissa Schuman’s separate California civil suit was set for court-supervised mediation to be completed by January 10, 2027, with trial scheduled for May 10, 2027. These are future dates reported for that California proceeding, not dates or outcomes from the Nevada appeals, and they may change. The report describes Schuman’s allegations and Carter’s counterclaims as competing assertions. See the Associated Press account.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How the dispute reached these appeals
The Associated Press’s 2023 account describes earlier Nevada civil suits in which women alleged sexual assault and notes Carter denied the allegations. It also reports an earlier decision allowing Carter’s countersuit to proceed. That earlier ruling should be kept distinct from the 2026 Repp appeal and the separate 2025 Schuman appeal: each addresses a different stage or legal issue, rather than supplying a single final judgment on all claims.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Graduation Gifts for Lawyer - Celebrate the achievements of a new lawyer or honor a seasoned attorney with our exquisite lawyer keychain, perfect for law school graduation and special occasions. Bookmarks for book lovers teacher women men. It’s a nice gesture type gift. Just right for the bookworm moving on and who likes to read. Make reading more fun.
- Law School Graduation Gifts - The lawyer bookmark makes a funny thoughtful present for any lawyer in your life. Great fun gifts for judge, lawyer school student, paralegal, prosecutor, attorney friend, future lawyer, divorce lawyer, new lawyer, retired lawyer, soon to be lawyer, law school graduation student, Lawyers appreciation gift, law student graduation gift. etc.
- Inspirational Attorney Gifts - Perfect graduation and birthday gifts for lawyer, judge, attorney, law and judge students, great gift for Christmas Day, Anniversary Day, Thanksgiving Day, Valentines Day and Birthday to a important law practitioner in your life, a newly qualified lawyer or perhaps a gift for someone work about law, etc.
- Metal Bookmark - The inspirational bookmark is made of high quality stainless steel, not rust or tarnish and is very durable so it can be treasure for a lifetime! Bookmark pendant size: 5.12*0.39inch(13*1cm). Perfect for fits most books.
- Future Lawyer Gifts Bookmark - The encouragement soon to be lawyer bookmark will be wrapped beautifully, ready to be gifted. Let this beautiful bookmark bring a smile to trainee lawyers, those going to law school, legal assistants, paralegal assistants, judges, courtroom reporters, attorneys, those waiting to take their bar exams, lawyers in training, student barristers, anyone who is in training, studying labor law student.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
