Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11On September 29, 2025, J.K. Rowling responded to Emma Watson’s comments about their relationship on Jay Shetty’s On Purpose podcast. Rowling wrote that Watson was “ignorant of how ignorant she is,” linking that judgment to her view of Watson’s experience outside wealth and fame and to their earlier disagreement over transgender rights. The exchange documents an ongoing public disagreement, not a reconciliation.
What did Rowling say about Watson?
In a lengthy post on X, Rowling wrote: “Like other people who’ve never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is.” The full sentence matters: “ignorant” was part of a broader criticism of Watson’s life experience, rather than a standalone description.
Rowling opened by saying, “I’m not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created.” She also said Watson and her former co-stars were entitled to their views and should not face threats, violence, or loss of work because of them. At the same time, Rowling criticized Watson’s public comments and characterized them as harmful to women’s rights. Those are Rowling’s claims and interpretations, not independently established findings. The J.K. Rowling Index preserves the post’s full text as an archive; it says it is not associated with Rowling or the Harry Potter rights holders. The archive’s Emma Watson entry identifies the original X post.
What prompted the response?
Shortly before Rowling’s post, Watson discussed their strained relationship on Jay Shetty’s podcast. The Guardian reported Watson saying she hoped people with differing views could continue to love one another, and that she still treasured Rowling and the person she had known. As the Guardian quoted her: “I really don’t believe that … holding the love and support and views that I have, mean[s] that I can’t and don’t treasure Jo and the person that I had personal experiences with.” This wording is reported through the newspaper, not verified here against a full podcast transcript.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors#1 Best Overall
Watson’s reported point was that disagreement over views did not erase her personal affection for Rowling. Rowling’s response rejected the idea that her former actor’s affection or past connection required her agreement, then moved into criticism of Watson’s experience and public advocacy. The Guardian’s September 29, 2025 report and TheWrap’s account of the exchange describe the timing and reported context.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Which earlier events did Rowling cite?
The wider disagreement over transgender rights
The exchange took place against the background of Rowling’s gender-critical views and Watson’s public support for transgender people. The Guardian reported that Watson, Daniel Radcliffe, and Rupert Grint had previously taken issue with Rowling’s beliefs. Rowling’s post criticized Watson’s public position and interpreted it as damaging to women’s rights; that characterization belongs to Rowling, rather than being a neutral description of the dispute.
Rank #2
Watson’s 2022 BAFTA remark and a handwritten note
Rowling recalled Watson saying “I’m here for all of the witches” at the 2022 BAFTA film awards, describing the remark as a turning point in how she felt about Watson. Rowling also referred to a handwritten note Watson sent after the speech and said it did not reassure her. These details explain Rowling’s own account of the relationship’s deterioration; they do not independently establish Watson’s intent or what the note meant to either person.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
- Condition: New
- The perfect gift for collectors and new readers alike, we now present a breathtaking special edition boxed set of J. K. Rowling's seven bestselling Harry Potter books!
- The box itself is beautifully designed with new artwork by Kazu Kibuishi, and the books create a gorgeous, magical vista when the spines are lined up together.
- The Harry Potter series has been hailed as "one for the ages" by Stephen King and "a spellbinding saga" by USA Today. Now is your chance to give this set to a reader who is ready to embark on the series that has changed so many young readers' lives.
Rank #3
- Complete hardcover boxed set of all seven Harry Potter books, presented in a collectible trunk-style boxA stunning gift for new readers and longtime fans of J.K. Rowling's magical seriesPerfect for building a home library and immersing young readers in the world of Hogwarts
What the exchange establishes—and what it does not
- Rowling posted her response on September 29, 2025, after Watson discussed their relationship on Jay Shetty’s podcast.
- Watson’s reported position was that she could disagree with Rowling and still treasure her as a person.
- Rowling connected her criticism to their public disagreement and to Watson’s BAFTA remark and subsequent note.
- The reporting establishes a public disagreement, but does not settle the parties’ motives or resolve their competing views.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
