Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Game of Thrones leaves its audience with plenty to debate, but an unanswered question is not automatically a plot hole. A plot hole contradicts something the series has established or breaks the cause-and-effect logic of the story. An unexplained fate, an abrupt political choice, or an abandoned prophecy may be frustrating without meeting that standard.
The distinctions matter especially in the finale. The questions below preserve the familiar “10 plot holes and 15 things that make no sense” framing while separating claims of contradiction from loose ends, unclear rules, and debatable decisions. The post-finale questions were raised by Marie Claire and TIME; they are not proof that the show contradicts itself.
First, what counts as a plot hole?
A plot hole is more than an event the series does not explain. It is a contradiction with an established fact, or a causal gap so large that the story cannot plausibly bridge it. A dropped thread or a rushed transition can weaken a story, but it is more accurate to call it unresolved or underexplained than to call it a plot hole.
The examples below are therefore labeled according to what the episodes and cited finale coverage establish. Some are genuine continuity questions; many are open-ended questions viewers can reasonably ask without having a definitive answer. The “10” and “15” are editorial groupings, not a verified count of objective errors.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
10 alleged plot holes: does the story actually contradict itself?
These are often presented as plot holes because they involve unresolved rules, consequences, or character choices. In most cases, however, the available evidence supports a more careful label: an ambiguity or loose end rather than a confirmed contradiction.
1. Could Bran have stopped the destruction of King’s Landing?
The finale prompts viewers to ask what Bran can foresee and whether he could have intervened before Daenerys attacked King’s Landing. The series does not settle the limits of his knowledge or his ability to change events. Without a clearly established rule that Bran knew the attack would happen and could prevent it, this is an unanswered question about his powers, not a demonstrated plot hole. TIME’s finale analysis treats it as one of the story’s major open questions.
2. Was Daenerys pregnant?
Jon raises the possibility that Mirri Maz Duur may have been wrong about Daenerys’s ability to have children. The series never confirms a pregnancy. Marie Claire’s May 20, 2019 roundup asks the question, but the possibility is not an established fact that the finale contradicts.
3. Why is the Night’s Watch still needed?
After the White Walkers’ apparent defeat, the finale still sends Jon to the Night’s Watch. Tyrion offers the line, “The world will always need a place for bastards and broken men,” as a rationale for the institution. But the show does not explain what practical purpose the Watch will serve now, or how it will operate. That is an unresolved future, not proof that the Watch’s existence is impossible. TIME also flags the question.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minute4. Who repays the Iron Bank?
The series establishes the Iron Bank as a major lender, but the finale does not identify who will settle outstanding claims after the upheaval in Westeros. A missing account of future repayment is a political and financial loose end; it does not, by itself, contradict an earlier event. TIME’s questions about the ending include the debt’s fate.
5. Why does the North receive independence without a broader settlement?
The finale grants the North independence, while the other kingdoms remain under Bran’s rule. The series does not explain why the other regions accept that arrangement, or whether they will challenge it later. The outcome may feel politically underdeveloped, but the absence of a fuller negotiation is not a contradiction of a stated rule that every kingdom must be independent.
6. Why do Dorne and the Iron Islands not make the same demand?
Viewers can reasonably ask why Dorne and the Iron Islands do not renew earlier independence claims when the North secures its freedom. Yara Greyjoy had sought independence before, making her silence at the final council especially noticeable. The finale does not explain those choices; it leaves their political calculations open. Marie Claire raises Yara’s decision, and TIME questions the wider regional settlement.
Rank #2
- Used Book in Good Condition
- It is durable and long lasting
- It ensures you get the best usage for a longer period
7. What becomes of the Unsullied and Dothraki?
The finale shows the Unsullied preparing to leave Westeros and the Dothraki present after Daenerys’s death, but it does not provide a complete account of either group’s political future. Their loyalties, destinations, and role in the new order are not fully resolved. The omission leaves consequences unexplored; it does not establish a contradiction about what they must do.
Recommended Free Tools
8. What becomes of Meereen and Slaver’s Bay?
Daenerys leaves Daario Naharis in charge of Meereen, but the finale does not revisit the city or explain how its government fares after her death. Nor does it supply a full account of the wider region’s future. The series leaves an important political thread unfinished rather than showing a specific outcome that conflicts with an earlier fact. TIME identifies Essos’s unresolved future among the finale’s questions.
9. Did Jon fulfill Azor Ahai’s prophecy?
The series invokes prophecy and repeatedly invites interpretation, but the finale does not provide a definitive explanation of whether Jon fulfilled the Azor Ahai prophecy. The lack of a settled answer may make the prophecy feel abandoned; it is not a continuity error unless the story first establishes a specific, binding interpretation and then contradicts it. Marie Claire frames this as an open question.
10. Why does Brienne leave Sansa’s service?
Brienne’s place at the final council and her later decision to complete Jaime’s entry in the Kingsguard book prompt questions about her duties and loyalties. The finale does not spell out every step of her role after Sansa becomes Queen in the North. That missing connective explanation can make the transition feel abrupt, but the cited coverage does not establish a direct contradiction. Marie Claire raises the question of why Brienne leaves Sansa’s service.
15 things in the ending that remain unclear or hard to accept
These questions concern consequences, motivations, and story threads that the finale does not fully resolve. They can make the ending feel rushed or unsatisfying without necessarily making it incoherent.
1. What future does Daario build in Meereen?
Daenerys leaves Daario governing Meereen, but viewers never learn whether he retains power, how he handles the city’s factions, or what becomes of the reforms made under Daenerys. The ending moves back to Westeros without returning to that storyline. TIME notes the unaddressed future of Essos.
2. What happens to the Iron Bank’s claims?
The finale leaves the Iron Bank’s creditors and debts outside the new political settlement. It offers no named payer or repayment plan, so the answer remains unknown rather than contradicted. TIME specifically asks who will repay the bank.
Rank #3
3. What is the Night’s Watch’s actual mission now?
Tyrion’s explanation gives the Watch a social purpose, but the finale does not define its future responsibilities or explain whether the old threat beyond the Wall still warrants a permanent order. Jon’s departure is shown; the institution’s long-term purpose is not. TIME highlights the gap.
4. Why does the North’s independence settle the council’s decision?
The final council accepts that the North will be separate, but the show does not give a detailed account of why the other rulers agree or what leverage secures their consent. The scene establishes the outcome, not the full negotiation behind it.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →5. Why do the other kingdoms not demand independence?
The North’s status invites the question of whether other regions will seek the same arrangement. The finale ends before showing those debates. The fact that Dorne or the Iron Islands could ask is not the same as evidence that they did so and were refused. TIME raises this broader political uncertainty.
6. Why does Yara not renew her demand?
Yara previously pursued independence for the Iron Islands, yet the finale does not show her pressing the issue when the North separates. The story gives no explicit reason for the change in emphasis. Marie Claire points to the omission; viewers cannot treat an unstated motive as confirmed canon.
7. What becomes of Dorne’s political ambitions?
Dorne’s future under the new arrangement is left largely unexamined. The finale does not show whether its rulers prefer to remain in the realm, negotiate greater autonomy, or pursue independence. The question is about a missing political aftermath, not a contradiction shown onscreen.
8. Where do the Unsullied go after leaving Westeros?
The Unsullied set sail, but their final destination and longer-term plans are not explained in the finale. The show does not establish a subsequent fate for them in the cited coverage, so any more specific answer would be speculation.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →9. What do the Dothraki do after Daenerys’s death?
The Dothraki remain visible after Daenerys is killed, but the series does not explain who leads them or what becomes of them. Their presence raises a consequential question that the ending does not answer.
Rank #4
10. Could Daenerys have been pregnant?
Jon’s remark about Mirri Maz Duur’s reliability leaves open the possibility that Daenerys could conceive. No pregnancy is confirmed, and the finale does not return to the possibility. It remains an ambiguity, as Marie Claire’s question makes clear.
11. What did Bran know before the attack on King’s Landing?
The series never gives a comprehensive account of Bran’s foresight in the final conflict. Viewers are left to infer what he saw, when he saw it, and whether he could have affected events. TIME treats this as an unresolved question about Bran’s powers, not a settled rule the finale violates.
12. Was Jon meant to fulfill Azor Ahai’s prophecy?
The finale does not explain how Jon’s actions relate to the prophecy or whether the prophecy should be read literally. Because the show leaves that interpretation open, claims that Jon definitively did—or did not—fulfill it go beyond what the ending establishes. Marie Claire lists it among the finale’s unanswered questions.
13. Why does Bronn receive Highgarden and a council position?
The finale gives Bronn Highgarden and makes him Master of Coin, a result that can feel implausibly swift given the political upheaval. The show does not provide a detailed account of how the appointment is negotiated or what qualifies him for the office. Marie Claire raises both choices as questions about the ending; the series presents the appointments but does not elaborate their rationale.
14. Why does Brienne complete Jaime’s entry?
Brienne writing the rest of Jaime’s story in the Kingsguard book supplies an emotional closing image, but the finale does not explain what her act means for her own service or future. Its significance is open to interpretation rather than a factual inconsistency.
15. Which character fates are left outside the finale?
The ending does not revisit every character or region whose story mattered earlier in the series. A missing update can leave viewers unsatisfied, but absence from the closing episode is not itself proof that the character’s fate contradicts the show. The more useful criticism is that the finale prioritizes a small set of political outcomes over a comprehensive account of the world it leaves behind.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why do so many questions cluster around the finale?
The final episodes resolve the central struggle for the throne while moving quickly through the political arrangements that follow. That structure leaves less room for the practical consequences of Daenerys’s death, the new council, the North’s separation, and the fate of Essos. A story can make those transitions feel abrupt without violating its own facts; the distinction is between a compressed explanation and a broken continuity.
The showrunners also described an adaptation that combined and restructured the novels rather than assigning one book to each season. In an HBO-released Q&A dated March 23, 2012, David Benioff and Dan Weiss said: “We’re not looking at our series as a book-by-book adaptation so much as an adaptation of George’s entire saga.” They noted that A Storm of Swords was too long for one season and that A Feast for Crows and A Dance with Dragons overlap in time. That context explains the broad adaptation approach; it does not prove that a particular unresolved thread was intentional or answered. Read the reproduced Q&A at Westeros.org.
How to judge a disputed “plot hole”
- Find the established fact. Identify what the series explicitly showed or stated, rather than relying on a fan theory or assumed rule.
- Check for a real contradiction. Ask whether the later event cannot coexist with that earlier fact. An unexplained outcome alone is not enough.
- Separate missing motivation from impossible motivation. A character choice may feel unearned because the story omits its reasoning; that is different from the character being shown to choose mutually incompatible actions.
- Account for what the ending leaves open. Where the series supplies no answer—such as the Iron Bank’s repayment or Meereen’s future—label the matter unresolved instead of filling the gap with speculation.
A complete-series home-media collection was announced in 2019, with DVD and Blu-ray editions scheduled for release on December 3 of that year. That is historical release information, not confirmation of present-day stock. Westeros.org reported the announcement.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
