Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallBrazil’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) reportedly annulled a Charlie Brown Jr. trademark registration associated with Chorão’s son, Alexandre Abrão, and widow, Graziela Gonçalves, on 25 November 2025. The decision followed a challenge by Peanuts Worldwide, which said it had not authorized the use. It concerns the trademark registration—not every dispute over the band’s name, performances, recordings, compositions, or legacy.
What INPI decided
News reports say INPI declared the challenged registration administratively null on 25 November 2025, restoring Peanuts Worldwide’s exclusive position in the mark. The full administrative decision was not located, and the available reporting does not establish whether an appeal or later review has changed the result. The decision should therefore be described as reported, rather than treated as a confirmed final resolution of every related dispute.
Reports say Alexandre Abrão obtained the registration in 2022 in an arrangement described as shared with Peanuts. Peanuts later challenged it and denied authorizing the Brazilian use. CNN Brasil reported that Alexandre’s defense said he had been deceived by someone claiming to represent Peanuts and acknowledged that the authorization document was not genuine. That is the defense’s account; it is not, by itself, proof that Alexandre knowingly committed fraud.
Why the registration was reportedly annulled
CNN Brasil attributed INPI’s reasoning to Article 124 XVII of Brazil’s Industrial Property Law, Law 9,279/1996. As reproduced in the report, the provision bars registration of a literary, artistic, or scientific work—or a copyright-protected title—when it could cause confusion or association, unless the author or rights holder consents. The primary decision was not available for direct review, so this is the rationale as reported by CNN, not an independently verified account of the full ruling.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
- Peppermint Colored
In practical terms, the issue reported was whether the band name could be registered as a trademark without the necessary consent, given the asserted rights associated with Peanuts. The decision addresses that registration question; it does not automatically answer who may perform the music or use every other element associated with Charlie Brown Jr.
How the trademark case differs from the estate settlement
A separate inheritance-related proceeding concerned rights between Chorão’s heirs. UOL reported that a 2024 court order connected to the estate settlement led to Graziela Gonçalves becoming a cotitular. Its account described a 55%/45% division between Alexandre and Graziela of image and band-product rights. That reported division should not be read as a final allocation of all trademark rights against Peanuts: an estate settlement between family members and INPI’s decision on a trademark registration are distinct matters.
What the decision does—and does not—settle
Other disputes involving former Charlie Brown Jr. members Marcão Britto and Thiago Castanho were reported as ongoing. The reporting describes contested questions involving performances, promotion, and band-related rights. Those claims belong to separate proceedings; the INPI action does not, on the available information, resolve them.
- Trademark registration: INPI reportedly annulled the challenged registration and restored Peanuts Worldwide’s exclusivity.
- Inheritance and family rights: the reported 55%/45% settlement concerned image and band-product rights between Alexandre and Graziela, not a blanket ruling on trademark ownership against Peanuts.
- Performances and promotion: separate claims involving former members were still contested in the cited reporting.
- Recordings, compositions, image, and legacy: the reported trademark decision alone does not establish who controls every such right.
What is known about the band’s history
Charlie Brown Jr. was fronted by Chorão. Reports describe the group as active from 1992 to 2013 and say Chorão died in 2013. The later trademark dispute concerns control of a commercial mark associated with the band, not a reversal of that history or a comprehensive judgment on its cultural legacy.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Rank #3
- Matching Songbook to the Annually Anticipated Holiday Classic:
- Features 10 Songs
- Includes a Stunning Color Section Featuring Peanuts Illustrations
- Arranged for Solo Piano
- 40 Pages
What remains uncertain
The full 25 November 2025 INPI decision and an official current docket showing any appeal or subsequent review were not located in the cited reports. The status of parallel civil litigation is also time-sensitive. Accordingly, the reported nullity should not be used on its own to infer that every legal route is exhausted or to determine whether a particular show, promotion, or product is permitted.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Features 18 Songs
- Arranged for Solo Piano
- Standard Notation
- 56 Pages
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
